Openly gay 3 yeard old goes viral on social media

[koshergrl]

Child pornography

"The production of child pornography creates a permanent record of a child’s sexual abuse. When these images are placed on the Internet and disseminated online, the victimization of the children continues in perpetuity. Experts and victims agree that victims depicted in child pornography often suffer a lifetime of re-victimization by knowing the images of their sexual abuse are on the Internet forever. The children exploited in these images must live with the permanency, longevity, and circulation of such a record of their sexual victimization. This often creates lasting psychological damage to the child, including disruptions in sexual development, self-image, and developing trusting relationships with others in the future.

Child Pornography | CRIMINAL-CEOS | Department of Justice

Using your own link:

Federal law defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (persons less than 18 years old). Images of child pornography are also referred to as child sexual abuse images.

Having a 3 year old say they are gay is not a "visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct."

It's people like you that help to gray the area of real child porn. You're doing your cause no justice.

It's people like you, who claim that little kids proclaiming their sexual preferences for the world to look at over, and over, and over... is not sex abuse.. that *gray* the area of *real* child porn.

People like you who maintain that there is such a thing as "pedosexual" and it isn't really a pervert, it's just someone who has a hardwired compulsion to enjoy the *thought* of sex abuse of children...but would never act on it....
People like you who assert that children are *born* sexual and it's healthy and awesome.
People like you who declare that *computer generated* child porn should be okay because it *prevents* sex predators from acting on their desires...

who want to *gray* the area of *real* child porn.

The fact that you think there's *real* child porn, and then just the feel good fluff, tells me all I need to know about you, pervert.

People like me? Look here bitch, I never once said that kids are "born sexual beings." I never asserted that computer generated porn should be ok. So stop fucking saying that I said shit that I NEVER FUCKING SAID YOU STUPID CUNNT.

No, what did I say? That a 3yo saying they are gay is not child pornography. That's all I said you stupid bitch.

Learn to read.

Filming a 3 y.o. reveling in his so called sexual persuasion and then distributing it on the internet is child porn.

True story. I guarantee all your buddies have whacked off to it.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Filming a 3 y.o. reveling in his so called sexual persuasion and then distributing it on the internet is child porn.

True story. I guarantee all your buddies have whacked off to it.

You're making shit up. You have no fucking idea what child porn is. You're using it because you like drama. The words "child porn" make people cringe. So you call anything you don't like having to do with kids child porn.

Can a 3yo know they are gay? No. But is it child porn? Of course not. Only a fucking idiot would say it is.

You find me ONE FUCKING PROSECUTOR who would call that shit Child Porn and I'll concede.

But you won't, because it's not. How do you know? This website doesn't allow links to child porn and they allowed the link to stay.

gratuitous insult removed

 

[koshergrl]

"Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. ...Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal. Federal law prohibits the production, distribution, reception, and possession of an image of child pornography using or affecting any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce (See 18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). "

Citizen's Guide To U.S. Federal Law On Child Pornography | CRIMINAL-CEOS | Department of Justice

 

[Silhouette]

You're making shit up. You have no fucking idea what child porn is. You're using it because you like drama. The words "child porn" make people cringe. So you call anything you don't like having to do with kids child porn.

Can a 3yo know they are gay? No. But is it child porn? Of course not. Only a fucking idiot would say it is.

She's right though. Filming a child engaged in any type of sexual depiction, even the revelation of his sexual deviance and then distributing that for public consumption does legally qualify as child pornography. It sounds like you're arguing for blurring clean lines. And you know what that means...

BTW, you look a little heated defending that what's being done to this boy isn't 1. Sexualizing him and 2. Doing so with film for public distribution.

Care to talk about it?

 

[airplanemechanic]

No shes not right at all. Child porn requires elicit sexual abuse to occur. Having a child say they are gay is not abuse. That's no more child porn than this is:

Dad of 12-year-old transgender child: 'He’s trying to be his best self'

 

[koshergrl]

When perverts produce and spread video of children, too young to legally engage in sexual activities, proudly proclaiming their intent to engage in sexual activities (*cough* *as soon as they're old enough* *cough*) guess what..that's child porn.

"Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct."

And remember..."the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity."

So yeah, a 3 year old being filmed *embracing* their sexuality, then spread about the internet...

I just know I wouldn't want it on my computer. I certainly wouldn't want any record of me forwarding it around.

Citizen's Guide To U.S. Federal Law On Child Pornography | CRIMINAL-CEOS | Department of Justice

 

[Silhouette]

No shes not right at all. Child porn requires elicit sexual abuse to occur. Having a child say they are gay is not abuse. That's no more child porn than this is:

Dad of 12-year-old transgender child: 'He’s trying to be his best self'

That is also exploiting a child's sexualized confusion for attention. Both qualify as child porn if filmed for public consumption. Good for you. You're understanding law now.

Here's how the law reads at its base: ANY SEXUALIZED DISCUSSIONS OR DEPICTIONS OF ANY CHILD OF ANY AGE MEANT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION OR OTHER DISTRIBUTION.

The originators of this "gone viral" exploited child must be rounded up and arrested as the unambiguous law requires.

 

[koshergrl]

No shes not right at all. Child porn requires elicit sexual abuse to occur. Having a child say they are gay is not abuse. That's no more child porn than this is:

Dad of 12-year-old transgender child: 'He’s trying to be his best self'

No, it doesn't.

"Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity."

Intent is everything. When the perverted owners of this poor child filmed it, and then circulated the film, for the purpose of titillating the pedophile community, and when the pedophile community then rejoices while whacking off to the sight of that precious child announcing his sexual preferences..

Sorry, it's child pornography.

Citizen's Guide To U.S. Federal Law On Child Pornography | CRIMINAL-CEOS | Department of Justice

 

[koshergrl]

You're making shit up. You have no fucking idea what child porn is. You're using it because you like drama. The words "child porn" make people cringe. So you call anything you don't like having to do with kids child porn.

Can a 3yo know they are gay? No. But is it child porn? Of course not. Only a fucking idiot would say it is.

She's right though. Filming a child engaged in any type of sexual depiction, even the revelation of his sexual deviance and then distributing that for public consumption does legally qualify as child pornography. It sounds like you're arguing for blurring clean lines. And you know what that means...

BTW, you look a little heated defending that what's being done to this boy isn't 1. Sexualizing him and 2. Doing so with film for public distribution.

Care to talk about it?

Remember..there's REAL child porn that it's illegal to create/have/view/distribute..

then there's the FAKE child porn....the stuff that doesn't actually show the 3 y.o. engaged in sex acts but which gives purveyors a less intense, more generalized *warm fuzzy feeling*.

Durst not to cornfuse the two. Cuz if you watch one of them..you're a pervert. If you watch the other..well, you're still a pervert, but the distinction is important amongst the pervs. At least that's what the pervs maintain.

Remember..there's pedophiles...and their warmer and less criminal counterparts, the pedosexuals...who would NEVER actually ACT on their desire.

Those are the ones who think there are two types of kiddie porn. It's distinguished by the fact that they would LIKE to watch the real thing..but instead settle for the *non porn* version of kids dressing up and professing their sexual attraction towards adults of the same sex.

 

[airplanemechanic]

It's not child porn. If it is, why are you on here? Why are you on a forum that allows the proliferation of child porn? You sicko.

And yes it requires abuse. Abuse can be taking a nude photo of a child. The kid isn't naked. The kid is saying they are gay. The kid could say they are a kitty cat. It doesn't matter.

Answer this, if it's child porn, why is it still on this forum? Why isn't the link taken down? Why isn't the parent of the child, or parents, being prosecuted?

I would argue that video taping a child beauty pageant is closer to child porn than a 3yo saying they're gay.

 

[Gracie]

April 19, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Pro-homosexual websites and social media users are promoting the story of a three-year-old child who is supposedly “openly gay.”
‘Openly gay’ 3-year-old goes viral on social media



Hate to tell you this and break reality to you , but you have a MENTAL ILLNESS if you think this is even possible.
3 yr olds can not decipher what they are or aren't.....

Half the lunatic adults don't even know wtf they are let alone a three year old.

We are sinking and sinking fast if America's Trump haters don't wake the hell up you will become just like Europe and you will be watching your kids getting raped all under the name and rights of those third world nations who believe in child marriages you stupid ass pos morons.

How the hell does a 3 year old even know what gay means????

 

[SassyIrishLass]

April 19, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Pro-homosexual websites and social media users are promoting the story of a three-year-old child who is supposedly “openly gay.”
‘Openly gay’ 3-year-old goes viral on social media



Hate to tell you this and break reality to you , but you have a MENTAL ILLNESS if you think this is even possible.
3 yr olds can not decipher what they are or aren't.....

Half the lunatic adults don't even know wtf they are let alone a three year old.

We are sinking and sinking fast if America's Trump haters don't wake the hell up you will become just like Europe and you will be watching your kids getting raped all under the name and rights of those third world nations who believe in child marriages you stupid ass pos morons.

How the hell does a 3 year old even know what gay means????

It doesn't

 

[airplanemechanic]

No 3yo has a clue what gay is. That's the absurdity of it all.

 

[Gracie]

3 year olds parrot what they hear or are told.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

3 year olds parrot what they hear or are told.

Sounds like progressives

 

[koshergrl]

It's not child porn. If it is, why are you on here? Why are you on a forum that allows the proliferation of child porn? You sicko.

And yes it requires abuse. Abuse can be taking a nude photo of a child. The kid isn't naked. The kid is saying they are gay. The kid could say they are a kitty cat. It doesn't matter.

Answer this, if it's child porn, why is it still on this forum? Why isn't the link taken down? Why isn't the parent of the child, or parents, being prosecuted?

I would argue that video taping a child beauty pageant is closer to child porn than a 3yo saying they're gay.

Of course you would.

 

[airplanemechanic]

It's not child porn. If it is, why are you on here? Why are you on a forum that allows the proliferation of child porn? You sicko.

And yes it requires abuse. Abuse can be taking a nude photo of a child. The kid isn't naked. The kid is saying they are gay. The kid could say they are a kitty cat. It doesn't matter.

Answer this, if it's child porn, why is it still on this forum? Why isn't the link taken down? Why isn't the parent of the child, or parents, being prosecuted?

I would argue that video taping a child beauty pageant is closer to child porn than a 3yo saying they're gay.

Of course you would.

And so would 99% of people reading this thread.

 

[koshergrl]

It's not child porn. If it is, why are you on here? Why are you on a forum that allows the proliferation of child porn? You sicko.

And yes it requires abuse. Abuse can be taking a nude photo of a child. The kid isn't naked. The kid is saying they are gay. The kid could say they are a kitty cat. It doesn't matter.

Answer this, if it's child porn, why is it still on this forum? Why isn't the link taken down? Why isn't the parent of the child, or parents, being prosecuted?

I would argue that video taping a child beauty pageant is closer to child porn than a 3yo saying they're gay.

Of course you would.

And so would 99% of people reading this thread.

Oh I don't think so.

 

[Faun]

Oh look ... yet another conservative’s I hate gays, thread.

Who the fuck cares that there are gay people in the world?

People that care about little boys being molested. See my signature for details.

LOL

Then where’s your outrage for all the straight people who molest little kids?

 

[Faun]

When perverts produce and spread video of children, too young to legally engage in sexual activities, proudly proclaiming their intent to engage in sexual activities (*cough* *as soon as they're old enough* *cough*) guess what..that's child porn.

"Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct."

And remember..."the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity."

So yeah, a 3 year old being filmed *embracing* their sexuality, then spread about the internet...

I just know I wouldn't want it on my computer. I certainly wouldn't want any record of me forwarding it around.

Citizen's Guide To U.S. Federal Law On Child Pornography | CRIMINAL-CEOS | Department of Justice

You know you’re fucking retarded, right? According to you, if a 3 year old says they want to have a family of their own some day, that’s child porn.