Op-Ed: So is There a Palestinian State?

It seems to me to be one of the biggest jokes of the history of mankind---
the dogs of arabia are INSISTING on creating a country named-----the
name that was used by some roman schmucks as an altenative
to ISRAEL/JUDEA and beyond that joke----islamo nazi pigs are insisting
on referring to THEMSELVES using a word that was used ONLY to
describe jews living in ISRAEL/JUDEA for almost 2000 years
 
There is a " Palestinian State" with Israel not returning to the Borders the Arabs have never accepted and their refusal to accept " Right of Return" SOUNDS GOOD TO ME!!!
 
on referring to THEMSELVES using a word that was used ONLY to
describe jews living in ISRAEL/JUDEA for almost 2000 years

So, was Jesus a Palestinian then?
No. There was no Palestine during Jesus' time.

Nor were their Muslims but their were (and are) Hebrews.
SHAYKH PROF. PALAZZI COMMENTS:
God wanted to give Avraham a double blessing, through Ishmael and through Isaac, and ordered that Ishmael's descendents should live in the desert of Arabia and Isaac's in Canaan.
The Qur'an recognizes the Land of Israel as the heritage of the Jews and it explains that, before the Last Judgment, Jews will return to dwell there. This prophecy has already been fulfilled. :D
 
Last edited:


I read the article and the credentials of the author-- I can see where you
do not agree with some of his statements ---neither would Achmadinejad
and many other notables-----but where are the actual LIES? I did not
notice a single outright "LIE"
 


I read the article and the credentials of the author-- I can see where you
do not agree with some of his statements ---neither would Achmadinejad
and many other notables-----but where are the actual LIES? I did not
notice a single outright "LIE"

Of course you wouldn't.

He states:

According to international law, an entity must meet four criteria in order to claim statehood: 1. It must exercise effective and independent governmental control; 2. It must possess a defined territory over which it exercises such control; 3. It must have the capacity to freely engage in foreign relations; 4. It must have effective and independent control over a permanent population.

The law reads:

ARTICLE 1

The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a ) a permanent population; b ) a defined territory; c ) government; and d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.

The Avalon Project : Convention on Rights and Duties of States (inter-American); December 26, 1933

There is quite a difference. It looks like he is setting up a false premise to foster an agenda. This is not the only problem with his article.
 

What it accomplished is a theoretical Legitimacy for A Palestinian State which means nothing to Israel who ignores the UN world body...

And nothing realistic will happen until the Arabs sort out their own problems. The Israeli state has nukes that threat alone will protect her until one of the
Islamic States acquires them too like N. Korea today as Iran is doing. With the amount of pure unadulterated hate in that area, they just might use them.

This Pax Americana will not last forever. America is becoming the largest producer of oil in the world and will soon become a net exporter. Israel’s puppet state strategic need will soon vanish.
 
irosie91, et al,

Well, actually, our friend "PF Tinmore" is correct here. The Treaty of Sèvres is void. It was with the Ottoman Empire which disolved. It was not implemented at the time of the collapse. Mustafa Kemal (Ataturk) took power and disowned the treaty. It might as well had never been written.

try to be a bit more specific----that is the SPECIFIC LIE?

Israel’s legal rights stem from the Treaty of Sèvres (1920) and from the League of Nations Mandate (1922).

No it didn't.

oh ok thanks ----not impressed
(COMMENT)

EXCERPTs A/PV.207 11 May 1949 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE THIRD SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY said:
  • It was logical that the United Nations, which had created the State of Israel, should also admit it to membership.
  • At the invitation of the President, the delegation of Israel took its place in the General Assembly.
SOURCE: A/PV.207 of 11 May 1949

Most Respectfully,
R
 
irosie91, et al,

Well, actually, our friend "PF Tinmore" is correct here. The Treaty of Sèvres is void. It was with the Ottoman Empire which disolved. It was not implemented at the time of the collapse. Mustafa Kemal (Ataturk) took power and disowned the treaty. It might as well had never been written.

No it didn't.

oh ok thanks ----not impressed
(COMMENT)

EXCERPTs A/PV.207 11 May 1949 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE THIRD SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY said:
  • It was logical that the United Nations, which had created the State of Israel, should also admit it to membership.
  • At the invitation of the President, the delegation of Israel took its place in the General Assembly.
SOURCE: A/PV.207 of 11 May 1949

Most Respectfully,
R

Whatever the decision of the General Assembly regarding the admission of Israel, it would not change the verdict of history. The record would always reveal the true facts. The League of Nations and later the United Nations had sanctioned the invasion of Palestine by immigrants who had set up gangs to terrorize the legitimate inhabitants. They had sanctioned aggression against an innocent people, disappointed their natural aspirations and violated their inherent rights. The United Nations, by admitting Israel, would be offering shelter to a group which had not only imposed its rule by force on the people Palestine, but which had also driven from their homes almost a million of those people. A recent report in the New York Times had revealed that many of those who had attempted to return had been fired at. Finally, the Zionists had not respected the resolutions of the General Assembly and had given no definite assurances that they would do so in the future. They felt that they were absolved of such assurances because under the shield of power politics they would always find excuses and apologies. They had planned to realize their aggressive designs by invoking three pretexts: the establishment of a national home, the solution of the problem of the European displaced persons and the final fait accompli. In view of the historical precedents, tile United Nations must realize that the recognition of accomplished facts meant the sanctioning of aggression and injustice.

Thanks for the link.
 

Forum List

Back
Top