Oooops!! 300 scientists say NOAA rigging temperature data!!

[IanC]

how, exactly, is a letter released in January 2016, to support an investigation started in November 2015, over a paper published in June 2015, considered old news? has the statute of limitations for climate science fraud dropped to six months now?

 

[elektra]

He said she said, dogs chasing thier tails

 

[IanC]

He said she said, dogs chasing thier tails

perhaps.

but there is a lot of information to be gleaned from raw communications before a sanitized version fit for the public is released.

FOI on hansen's Y2K bug, or the retracted Gergis Australian hockeystick paper prove it.

 

[elektra]

It really is a mess with no solution, a bunch of brainiac scientists arguing computer algorithms

 

[jc456]

and yet it's settled, ask any of the warmers in here. Consensus and all that. yet fiddling with the historical figures on temperatures. Like a bunch of bratty kids who can't play with anyone. Ask Robert Kennedy what should happen to anyone who doubts the warmer drama! Now he backs off:
Activist Robert Kennedy Jr. Denies He Wants to 'Jail Climate Change Deniers'—Actually Wants to 'Execute' Climate Villain Corporations and Think Tanks

Activist Robert Kennedy Jr. Denies He Wants to 'Jail Climate Change Deniers'—Actually Wants to 'Execute' Climate Villain Corporations and Think Tanks
"In his article "Jailing Climate Deniers" over at EcoWatch, prominent environmental activist Robert Kennedy, Jr., magnanimously allows that individual Americans—even misguided souls who question the scientific consensus on man-made global warming—have a First Amendment right to speak their piece. Corporations and think tanks, however, are another matter. Kennedy argues that such organizations do not enjoy free speech protections and therefore can and should be targeted for death by activist state attorneys general. As Kennedy explains: "

And yet the temps are still a changing back 100 years ago. And the skeptic is the goof. ok frances.

 

[jc456]

This is how messed up the warmers really are, Jr talks in this video about what to do with skeptics and then posts that denial.

It is definitely a warmers world.

 

[bripat9643]

and yet it's settled, ask any of the warmers in here. Consensus and all that. yet fiddling with the historical figures on temperatures. Like a bunch of bratty kids who can't play with anyone. Ask Robert Kennedy what should happen to anyone who doubts the warmer drama! Now he backs off:
Activist Robert Kennedy Jr. Denies He Wants to 'Jail Climate Change Deniers'—Actually Wants to 'Execute' Climate Villain Corporations and Think Tanks

Activist Robert Kennedy Jr. Denies He Wants to 'Jail Climate Change Deniers'—Actually Wants to 'Execute' Climate Villain Corporations and Think Tanks
"In his article "Jailing Climate Deniers" over at EcoWatch, prominent environmental activist Robert Kennedy, Jr., magnanimously allows that individual Americans—even misguided souls who question the scientific consensus on man-made global warming—have a First Amendment right to speak their piece. Corporations and think tanks, however, are another matter. Kennedy argues that such organizations do not enjoy free speech protections and therefore can and should be targeted for death by activist state attorneys general. As Kennedy explains: "

And yet the temps are still a changing back 100 years ago. And the skeptic is the goof. ok frances.

Robert Kennedy is a frikken Nazi. All these warmer scumbags are Nazis. They can't get their socialist schemes past the electorate honestly, so they're trying to scare us into it. The problem is, no one is fooled.

 

[elektra]

They have already won.

 

[bripat9643]

They have already won.

Nah. They are getting weaker by the month. Obama is their last gasp. If a Republican wins the election, you'll never hear about AGW again.

 

[elektra]

They have already won.

Nah. They are getting weaker by the month. Obama is their last gasp. If a Republican wins the election, you'll never hear about AGW again.

How do you explain that the solution is in full force, solar, wind, and ethanol?

 

[bripat9643]

They have already won.

Nah. They are getting weaker by the month. Obama is their last gasp. If a Republican wins the election, you'll never hear about AGW again.

How do you explain that the solution is in full force, solar, wind, and ethanol?

It's not anywhere near "full force" yet. When we are all freezing in the dark, then you'll know it's in "full force."