Ooooh Iran is banning US citizens from entering their f**kd up country.

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Dec 30, 2014
44,739
60,477
3,645
The Southwestern Desert
What a joke. Iran props up Assad's inhuman regime, they refuse to take in any Syrian refugees themselves and then they whine about Trump temporarily banning Muslims until we can figure out Obama's jacked up system for resettlement. Cut off ALL AID to Iran, and if they fuck with any of our ships or crew, blow them out of the water. Hey Iranian goat humpers: Welcome to the post-Obama world.:2up:
 
What a joke. Iran props up Assad's inhuman regime, they refuse to take in any Syrian refugees themselves and then they whine about Trump temporarily banning Muslims until we can figure out Obama's jacked up system for resettlement. Cut off ALL AID to Iran, and if they fuck with any of our ships or crew, blow them out of the water. Hey Iranian goat humpers: Welcome to the post-Obama world.:2up:
Well, in all fairness, the Russians are on the side of Assad and the Iranians.

No one is blocking Muslims as such.

Trump is wisely following Jimmy Carter's approach: cut off all people from certain countries before being carefully vetted.

If the American people had done that to any NY candidate for President, we all would have been far better off.
 
Well, Trump hasn't banned Muslims from the US. Looks like Iranians fall for Democrat Fake News too. Trump has implemented the limiting of Immigration from known Terror-Haven nations like Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, and so on. Muslims will still be coming to the US.

But that being said, if i were Iran, i would ban US Citizens too. The US is the enemy. Why would Americans be going there? So i'm fine with it banning Americans. That's its right as a sovereign nation.
 
America's problems with the middle east are all self inflicted.

I couldn't agree more. We believe in life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Our laws are largely dictated on the freedom of the individual. We don't believe in making our women second class citizens, killing apostates, or rapeing children. Indeed that is a self inflicted wound that creates ripples throughout the Middle East. But that doesn't mean that we should reverse our values to become more likeable to the Middle East.
 
Tit for tat. Let the games begin.
All those years of careful diplomacy to keep the bombs in their silos, now undone.
 
What a joke. Iran props up Assad's inhuman regime, they refuse to take in any Syrian refugees themselves and then they whine about Trump temporarily banning Muslims until we can figure out Obama's jacked up system for resettlement. Cut off ALL AID to Iran, and if they fuck with any of our ships or crew, blow them out of the water. Hey Iranian goat humpers: Welcome to the post-Obama world.:2up:

Oh thank God! No more coming to the rescue of wacky Americans who travel to Iran.
 
Shit. Now I'll have to change my travel plans. What's Syria like this time of year? :terror:

"Shit. Now I'll have to change my travel plans. What's Syria like this time of year? :terror:"

Well Syria is so so, but Beirut serves a better Conifer cocktail darling :smoke:

convert


I completely recommend the Conifer Cocktail, people here already know that I'm a Cocktail Aficionado.

¾oz Pear Brandy, ¾oz Green Chartreuse, ¾oz Maraschino Liqueur, ¾oz Dry Vermouth, 6 Droplets of Spruce Essence and a Maraschino cherry.

Shaken but not stirred, WTF is wrong with people who commit the ultimate sin of stirring a Cocktail :omg:
 
America's problems with the middle east are all self inflicted.


Yep, its' all on us. ME was a virtual paradise from time of Mohammed. Are we to blame for them wiping out Lebanon too?

Actually, he's somewhat correct. Our foreign policy has played a role in the catastrophes that have gone on over there for the last 70 years. We are, in fact, directly responsible for today's radicalized Iran.
 
America's problems with the middle east are all self inflicted.


Yep, its' all on us. ME was a virtual paradise from time of Mohammed. Are we to blame for them wiping out Lebanon too?

Actually, he's somewhat correct. Our foreign policy has played a role in the catastrophes that have gone on over there for the last 70 years. We are, in fact, directly responsible for today's radicalized Iran.

Yes and the disaster begin with the 1953 coup d'état where the CIA was directly involved in the overthrow of Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh.

The British with the Americans did this (British Codename Operation Boot, American Codename Operation Ajax)

Mohammad Mosaddegh wanted to audit the books of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) and also to reduce APOC's control of Iran's oil, APOC refused to allow this, as they would, so the Iranian Parliament voted to nationalise the Iranian oil industry and they also expelled all foreign representatives of APOC from Iran.

So of course Prime Minister Mosaddegh had to go and so Britain (MI6) and America (CIA) jointly organised the overthrowing of his Government and installed the Western Puppet Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who had been the Shah of Iran since 1941 to not run Iran, but to just sit there and allow British and then also American oil companies to rape Iran of her oil and give the Iranian people peanuts from the profits.

A nation has a right to OWN it's OWN resources, why shouldn't Iran have nationalised it's OWN oil industry.
 
America's problems with the middle east are all self inflicted.


Yep, its' all on us. ME was a virtual paradise from time of Mohammed. Are we to blame for them wiping out Lebanon too?

Actually, he's somewhat correct. Our foreign policy has played a role in the catastrophes that have gone on over there for the last 70 years. We are, in fact, directly responsible for today's radicalized Iran.

Yes and the disaster begin with the 1953 coup d'état where the CIA was directly involved in the overthrow of Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh.

The British with the Americans did this (British Codename Operation Boot, American Codename Operation Ajax)

Mohammad Mosaddegh wanted to audit the books of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) and also to reduce APOC's control of Iran's oil, APOC refused to allow this, as they would, so the Iranian Parliament voted to nationalise the Iranian oil industry and they also expelled all foreign representatives of APOC from Iran.

So of course Prime Minister Mosaddegh had to go and so Britain (MI6) and America (CIA) jointly organised the overthrowing of his Government and installed the Western Puppet Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who had been the Shah of Iran since 1941 to not run Iran, but to just sit there and allow British and then also American oil companies to rape Iran of her oil and give the Iranian people peanuts from the profits.

A nation has a right to OWN it's OWN resources, why shouldn't Iran have nationalised it's OWN oil industry.


Indeed. As this was essentially the same scenario Castro pulled; tossed out US corporations.
 
Iran's alt-right is no doubt foaming at the mouth in celebration of this. Just like their counterparts in the U.S. over the Muslim ban.

I've never understood the use of the word "alt right." Generally by definition this means those who do not fit in with the traditional views of your normal Republicans. Perhaps we should label socialists and communists, the alt left? But that wouldn't make sense as their views are mainstream among today's democrats. Well I guess I've answered my question then. Alt right it is.
 

Forum List

Back
Top