Only Under Obama. UN workers to monitor OUR election

Please come back when you can provide a credible source. Because a blog that has a ticker at the top of the page saying "CALL TO ACTION: WE MUST RETAKE THE SENATE TO REPEAL OBAMACARE – CLICK HERE FOR LIST OF CLOSEST SENATE RACES AND LINKS TO GET INVOLVED" has about as much validity as reading the splatter of monkey shit flung on a wall to pick winning ponies.
 
The OP did get one part of her idiotic thread title right...the "only under Obama" part. What she got wrong was what was "only under Obama" and that, of course, would be the RW outrage over observers.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: del
2002

2006

2008

But when does the RW freak out about it? When the black guy is President...even though he had nothing to do with the organization that is observing.

right, because you know RW didn't freak out over this under the WHITE GUY..

you people are pathetic
 
Please come back when you can provide a credible source. Because a blog that has a ticker at the top of the page saying "CALL TO ACTION: WE MUST RETAKE THE SENATE TO REPEAL OBAMACARE – CLICK HERE FOR LIST OF CLOSEST SENATE RACES AND LINKS TO GET INVOLVED" has about as much validity as reading the splatter of monkey shit flung on a wall to pick winning ponies.

Has obama said hell no you are not going to do that? Saying nothing is like agreeing with it.
 
2002

2006

2008

But when does the RW freak out about it? When the black guy is President...even though he had nothing to do with the organization that is observing.

right, because you know RW didn't freak out over this under the WHITE GUY..

you people are pathetic

Then find me some examples of the previous outrage.
 
right, because you know RW didn't freak out over this under the WHITE GUY..

you people are pathetic

Obviously they didn't, at least according to your own words. Please, you tell us, why are you only complaining now? Huh? Why do you complain ONLY UNDER OBAMA? Why do you make such a blatantly false statement as "only under Obama" when has nothing to do with the man and has been happening since before Obama was elected?
 
Last edited:
OK, libturds, make up your minds.
We don't have election fraud, so we don't need IDs. But we have election fraud, so we need UN "observers" to ensure it doesn't happen.
Really? Or is it more like, we have voter fraud, it is perpetrated by leftists, and needs to be protected at all costs in order for our boy to keep his narrow ass wedged in that chair in the oval office...or more recently, hangin' out with his homies as they jet all over the place, courtesy the American tax payer.
 
It's time to kick the UN out of the United States of America they can go the fuck to hell for all I care.

Of course - why would you care about an organisation that has provided cleaning drinking water for tens of millions of people, organised schools and medical treatment for people caught on war zones or helped eradicate diseases like small pox?

They are socialists and they must be stopped, because in a free marker world people who can not afford food should die of hunger. Just preferably not on TV and especially not when Family Guy is on the other channel.

Just about all, or at least far too many of United Nations activities are opposed to American values.

Let them go the way of the League Of Nations, or at least move to Mali, Zimbabwe or Cuba. America has had enough of immunity afforded to the diplomat law-breakers. Enough of occupying prime New York real estate and first and foremost, enough back-stabbing by third world yahoos.
 
OK, libturds, make up your minds.
We don't have election fraud, so we don't need IDs. But we have election fraud, so we need UN "observers" to ensure it doesn't happen.
Really? Or is it more like, we have voter fraud, it is perpetrated by leftists, and needs to be protected at all costs in order for our boy to keep his narrow ass wedged in that chair in the oval office...or more recently, hangin' out with his homies as they jet all over the place, courtesy the American tax payer.

I agree this is why we need voter ID to stop democratic and Republican voter fraud.
 
Texas is getting it right.

I was motivated to look up a couple of NY State's very verbose Election Law provisions.

§ 8–300. Voting; manner of
1. The inspectors shall admit within the voting area only
two voters at a time for each ballot scanner, ballot marking
device, or privacy booth and shall ascertain whether each such
voter is entitled to vote. If he or she is found to be entitled to
vote, he or she shall be permitted to proceed to the ballot
scanner, ballot marking device, or privacy booth to vote.
2. The operating of the ballot scanner by the voter while
voting or the use of a privacy booth or ballot marking device
for marking a ballot shall be secret and obscured from all
other persons
except as provided by this chapter in cases of voting by assisted voters or in cases of children under the age of sixteen accompanying their voting parents or guardians.
3. No voter shall remain within a privacy booth or at a
ballot scanner longer than a reasonable amount of time and if
he or she shall refuse to leave after the lapse of such time, he
or she shall be removed by the inspectors.
(L.1976, c. 233, § 1. Amended L.1996, c. 158, § 2; L.2005, c. 181, § 13, eff.
July 12, 2005; L.2010, c. 164, § 4, eff. July 7, 2010.)


§ 8–500. Watchers; provision for
1. At any general, special, town or village election, any
party committee or independent body whose candidates are
upon the ballot, and at any primary election, any two or more
candidates and any political committee may have for each
election district three watchers at any one time, not more than
one of whom may be within the guard rail at any one time.
Watchers shall be appointed by the chairman of any such
party, committee or independent body or by the candidates.
2. Watchers may be present at the polling place at least
fifteen minutes before the unlocking and examination of any
voting machine or ballot box at the opening of the polls, until
after the signing of the inspectors’ returns and proclamation of
the result.
3. The appointment of watchers for any election shall be by
a certificate in writing issued by the chairman or secretary of
the political party or independent body, or the candidates.
Such certificate shall be delivered to an inspector at the
election district.
4. Each watcher must be a qualified voter of the city or
county in which he is to serve.

(L.1976, c. 233, § 1. Amended L.1978, c. 9, § 71; L.1978, c. 373, § 79.)
-- http://www.elections.ny.gov/NYSBOE/download/law/2012NYElectionLaw.pdf

In my voting place, the "secrecy" provided was pretty much NON-existent the last time. I made no stink. If they don't change it this time, I will make a stink. A very public stink, including the press.

But as to Poll Watchers, if I see anybody "monitoring" anybody's voting I will challenge them. Properly. I will call over the voting officials/volunteers. I will have THEM ascertain whether the "watchers" are authorized under the law. If he local election officials refuse to do anything about it, I WILL call the police. I will make a public complaint. And I will get the press involved. The liberal main stream media may not care. But I bet I can bet FOX to cover such election law violations. :cool:

If the UN wants monitors at the American polling places, the would be monitors had BEST be local registered voters.
 

Forum List

Back
Top