Only one Senate Democrat supports Obama’s recess claim

That would be a meaningless waste of time. Obama may not have had the power to do what he did, but he did it. Until such times as the Courts rule he did not have the power to do it, His actions have the weight of law.

The Companies effected by the new Agencies, or the NLRB will have to be the ones to sue, and bring this situation before the courts.

Simply looking at the wording of the Constitution it seems clear Obama over stepped his Powers, However we all know it's not that simple anymore, Even our Supreme Court has been corrupted by Personal Ideologies. Anything can happen, and anything can be ruled Legal, Even the illegal.

When they define it let us know.



LOL! If the President did indeed make an appointment without recess, the Senate is the injured party, but if the Senate doesn't actually make a statement claiming to have been injured - to have had their authority usurped - then the supposed injured party is making no claim, and there is no case.

The "Companies affected" have no damages to claim.

Simply looking at the wording of the Constitution it seems clear Obama over stepped his Powers,
Really? Where does the Constitution define "recess" and state how long the Senate must be out of session for it to be considered in recess?



The Constitution does not and that is by intention. Only the Senate can define when the Senate is in recess. The Founders were a little fearful that a king might arise.

Their fears were apparently not unfounded.


When they define it let us know.
 
When they define it let us know.



LOL! If the President did indeed make an appointment without recess, the Senate is the injured party, but if the Senate doesn't actually make a statement claiming to have been injured - to have had their authority usurped - then the supposed injured party is making no claim, and there is no case.

The "Companies affected" have no damages to claim.

Really? Where does the Constitution define "recess" and state how long the Senate must be out of session for it to be considered in recess?



The Constitution does not and that is by intention. Only the Senate can define when the Senate is in recess. The Founders were a little fearful that a king might arise.

Their fears were apparently not unfounded.


When they define it let us know.



It has been defined. By that definition, the Senate is in session.

Why are you so anxious to centralize all power in the hands of one individual?
 

Forum List

Back
Top