On the 45th anniversary of Earth Day, still not a single bit of proof man has any effect on climate

We sure have an effect on pollution. Go visit China. And why do you think fish have so much Mercury?
Can I call 'em, or what?

Here we see the hysterical liberals are working on their **46th** year of changing the subject, bringing up irrelevancies, and general running away from the topic as maximum speed with their tails clamped firmly between their hind legs.

First I'm not a liberal. Pollution is obviously very real. There are places in China where they can't see the sky. And we are all limited on the amount of fish we can eat because of mercury pollution. This is very real.
 
Here we see the hysterical liberals are working on their **46th** year of changing the subject, bringing up irrelevancies, and general running away from the topic as maximum speed with their tails clamped firmly between their hind legs.
Pollution is obviously very real. There are places in China where they can't see the sky. And we are all limited on the amount of fish we can eat because of mercury pollution.
46 years and two days of desperately changing the subject. Clearly it's all they can do.
 
Here we see the hysterical liberals are working on their **46th** year of changing the subject, bringing up irrelevancies, and general running away from the topic as maximum speed with their tails clamped firmly between their hind legs.
Pollution is obviously very real. There are places in China where they can't see the sky. And we are all limited on the amount of fish we can eat because of mercury pollution.
46 years and two days of desperately changing the subject. Clearly it's all they can do.

Seems like all you can do is deny reality. You started a thread and that's all you have? Pathetic.
 
The first official "Earth Day" was April 22, 1970. And the big concern then, was "Global Cooling".

People have been "researching" this supposed manmade climate change for forty-five years. And after all that researching, all that screaming, all that denigration of those who don't see any evidence for it...

...not a single report proving that man has had any impact on climate change, or can ever have any in the foreseeable future, has ever been published.

Not one. In forty-five years.

Lots of stuff has been published saying that man has had an effect on climate change. and lots of it claims to "prove" it, or at least support it, by "logic" such as:

1.) Increased levels of (CO2, methane, hydrogen, pick your favorite "greenhouse gas") can change the climate.

2.) Man can create more greenhouse gases by paving too much land, or burning fossil fuels, or exhaling really heavily (insert the activity you want to demonize here).

3.) Man is doing that activity, so man is changing the climate.

No attempt to establish what increase in gases is necessary to actually change the climate in whatever way you are fearing this week. No attempt to find if man is actually creating that much. No attempt to find if such increases do or don't trigger other events that might absorb or use up more of those gases (more plants growing or oceans absorbing or whatever). Etc. etc.

And a great deal of publishing has been done, of documents that purport to "prove" that man is affecting the climate, by referring to long bibliographies of learned documents and other "studies". But if you actually look into those bibliographies and open up the documents they cite, you find... you guessed it, more bibliographies, pointing to yet more documents. No actual studies or experiments that demonstrate what the publishers say is true. Just references to even more studies... which in turn refer to even more studies... none of which ever actually prove the original assertion.

FORTY-FIVE YEARS. And not a single actual proof.

There's a reason for this. And it's similar to the reason why no chemical has ever been found that can turn lead into gold... something that has been "researched" for thousands of years.

And the reason is, because there just plain isn't any.

Go peddle your papers, manmade-global-whatever hysterics. You HAVE succeeded in convincing the rest of us of one thing: that you're selling snake oil, no matter how high a price you're charging for it. Nothing else could account for your complete failure to produce even ONE piece of proof, after all the resources you have expended (usually from other peoples' pockets) and forty-plus years of trying.

Why not join the Flat Earth Society? You'll find some people there, who have the mindset needed to believe you.

This is what you sound like:

8578649.jpg


Climate Change deniers are fucking retards.

Nuff said.
 
You are a lying piece of shit.

But..... You're a dimocrap. So that goes without saying.

Everything at that fucking link has been debunked

Global Warming Lies facts and myths and truths


You mean at that link?

:spinner:

Hey now, I'm reading that site now and it says that increased CO2 is good for tomatoes and plants. Didnt mention humans tho but humans are just like plants, right?

Never heard of Human Beans?
 
This is what you sound like:
TRANSLATION: I can't refute what you said, but I hate it anyway. So I'll call you names, lie about what you said, and then make up something you didn't say, lie about that too, and pretend you said it anyway. And hope that somebody somewhere believes me.
 
Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. The people that the OP has for support are obese junkies on the AM radio, un-degreed ex-TV weathermen, and fake British Lords.

Now what the wingnuts are trying to convince us of is that there is an international conspiracy among scientists of every nation and culture on earth to mislead and lie concerning global warming. Real tin hat material.
 
Of course we have an effect on our climate. It's idiotic not to think we don't.

The question is (the one dimocraps keep avoiding):

How much?

How much are Man's activities affecting the climate?

Are we responsible for 90% of the change? 99%...... 10%..... 1%......... Or, more likely, .001%

dimocraps are dumber than the idol worshiping pagans of 3,000 years ago.

Because that's all this is......

We know how much. We are responsible for the 80+ billion tons of ghgs we emit into the atmosphere each year, not to mention all the frigging other air pollutants, the destruction of 80% of the rainforests, the pollution going into our lakes, streams, underground - in our soils and aquifers, in our food, and in the ocean. But hey, that's progress (sarcasm).

wowzer! 80 beeeeeeeelion!

What the mass of Earth's atmosphere? These manmade emissions (assuming your numbers are accurate and we both know they're not) are a pimple on a gnats ass in comparison
 

Forum List

Back
Top