On July 1, one bullet makes a law abiding gun owner into a criminal, and it's insane....

[ClosedCaption]

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

Hows it feel to be unfairly characterized?

Wouldn't know.

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

Hows it feel to be unfairly characterized?

Wouldn't know.

Gotcha, so you used the word insane because you don't know...OK pal

 

[2aguy]

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

Hows it feel to be unfairly characterized?

Wouldn't know.

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

Hows it feel to be unfairly characterized?

Wouldn't know.

Gotcha, so you used the word insane because you don't know...OK pal

You seem to think I care about you in some way.......you left wingers are really, really stupid....

 

[ClosedCaption]

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

Hows it feel to be unfairly characterized?

Wouldn't know.

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

Hows it feel to be unfairly characterized?

Wouldn't know.

Gotcha, so you used the word insane because you don't know...OK pal

You seem to think I care about you in some way.......you left wingers are really, really stupid....

The topic has never been if you care about me sweetheart.

You just said that this was insane that some gun owners will be unfairly characterized as criminals. Then once you were called out on it you pretend you used the word insane for unknowable reasons...like Tourette's.

How is anyone going to discuss the insanity when you don't even know why you called it insane? lol...pretending to be stupid is your only play boo-hoo

 

[Skull Pilot]

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

What is so hard?

It's called complying with the law.....millions of people do it every day

Other than the fact it's a completely moronic law?

Well, it does make it more inconvenient if you want to shoot up a school or movie theater

Yeah that happens sooooo often

 

[Skull Pilot]

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

What is so hard?

It's called complying with the law.....millions of people do it every day

Other than the fact it's a completely moronic law?

Well, it does make it more inconvenient if you want to shoot up a school or movie theater

How so? most of those places are gun free zones. How many of these guys have been stopped when changing mags?

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

I'm not afraid of black guns so it really wouldn't bother me

 

[Skull Pilot]

What is so hard?

It's called complying with the law.....millions of people do it every day

Other than the fact it's a completely moronic law?

Well, it does make it more inconvenient if you want to shoot up a school or movie theater

How so? most of those places are gun free zones. How many of these guys have been stopped when changing mags?

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

That's what I usually carry even in those gun free zones

That's the nice thing about concealed carry; if you do it right no one even knows you're armed

 

[Skull Pilot]

How so? most of those places are gun free zones. How many of these guys have been stopped when changing mags?

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

See I would have my Glock so I don't have to be afraid of a wacko with a gun.

It's you idiots who choose to be defenseless that have to worry

 

[Skull Pilot]

So Californians

If you want to shoot up a school or movie theater, you will have to do it with magazines less than ten rounds.

I realize how inconvenient it is for you and having to constantly load magazines interferes with the joy of shooting six year olds but you will have to live with it

And of course they already do.....the Sorority shooter in California, used the legal 10 round magazines......

limiting magazines does nothing to stop mass shooters and assholes like you know it. You will be back to get all magazines in the next go around........

I feel so sorry about inconveniencing mass shooters
They have their rights too

What fun is shooting six year olds if you have to keep reloading?

Is it difficult to be so stupid?

I mean you must really try to be that dumb

or maybe I'm just giving you too much credit

 

[peach174]

How so? most of those places are gun free zones. How many of these guys have been stopped when changing mags?

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

That was the point I was making, he was not inside setting down in the theatre.
He broke in through one of the exits.

 

[MikeK]

What is so hard?

It's called complying with the law.....millions of people do it every day

There is no good reason to progressively limit our right to possess the kind of weaponry that would be necessary for personal defense under the kind of extreme circumstances we've seen developing in Europe. There is absolutely no reason to confidently believe the same circumstances will not arise here in which we will be confronted by terrorists armed with exactly the kind of weapons our government is doing its best to deprive the citizens of.

Considering the size of our population and the number and type of guns in the hands of our citizens throughout the past generations there have been remarkably few incidents of misuse of the kind of weapons government is seeking to deprive us of. So what is the real reason for these incremental restrictions on the type of weaponry we may possess?

Fortunately the U.S. has not (yet) been subjected to the kind of violent incursions by militantly aggressive young Middle Eastern and African men. The main reason for this is these emerging terrorists know the American population is armed and will not tolerate their uncivilized behavior. So this is not the time for our government to be reducing our ability to effectively defend ourselves -- unless there is some insidious political motive the general public has not yet been able to decipher.

 

[rightwinger]

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

What is so hard?

It's called complying with the law.....millions of people do it every day

Other than the fact it's a completely moronic law?

Well, it does make it more inconvenient if you want to shoot up a school or movie theater

Yeah that happens sooooo often

More than anywhere else in the world

 

[rightwinger]

Do you want to walk into a movie theater or sporting event with your kids and sit next to someone carrying a AR-15 with a 30 round magazine?

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

That was the point I was making, he was not inside setting down in the theatre.
He broke in through one of the exits.

The point I was making is that without movie theaters being designated safe zones, he can come in through the front door and bring his arsenal with him

 

[2aguy]

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

Hows it feel to be unfairly characterized?

Wouldn't know.

On July 1, in California, if you own a gun magazine that holds one more bullet than 10.......you go to jail...even though you haven't used your gun, or the magazine, to commit a crime. Simple possession of the magazine makes you a criminal and will put you in jail.

Notice...the gun grabbers in California didn't say..."use these magazines in a crime and you go to jail." No. they say just own one and you go to jail. See, the thing is...they don't care about criminals.....they hate guns, and they know the only way to get rid of those magazines is to make law abiding gun owners into criminals...otherwise, they can't touch those magazines...

Why California gun owners may be breaking the law on July 1

Sweeping new gun laws passed last year by California voters and legislators require those with magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition to get rid of them by July 1.

The question is: How many of California’s 6 million-plus gun owners are actually going to comply, even though violators face potential jail time if they’re caught?

Talk to gun owners, retailers and pro-gun sheriffs across California and you’ll get something akin to an eye roll when they’re asked if gun owners are going to voluntarily part with their property because Democratic politicians and voters who favor gun control outnumber them and changed the law.

In conservative, pro-gun Redding this week, Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko joked that gun owners were lining the block to hand their magazines in to the sheriff’s office (In reality, no one has turned one in). He said his deputies won’t be aggressively hunting for large-capacity magazines starting next month.

“We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door looking for them,” Bosenko said. “We’re essentially making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”

Hows it feel to be unfairly characterized?

Wouldn't know.

Gotcha, so you used the word insane because you don't know...OK pal

You seem to think I care about you in some way.......you left wingers are really, really stupid....

The topic has never been if you care about me sweetheart.

You just said that this was insane that some gun owners will be unfairly characterized as criminals. Then once you were called out on it you pretend you used the word insane for unknowable reasons...like Tourette's.

How is anyone going to discuss the insanity when you don't even know why you called it insane? lol...pretending to be stupid is your only play boo-hoo

I never said they would be characterized as criminals dipshit.....I posted that if they have magazine that holds more than 10 rounds they will be arrested...please keep up.

 

[2aguy]

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

That was the point I was making, he was not inside setting down in the theatre.
He broke in through one of the exits.

The point I was making is that without movie theaters being designated safe zones, he can come in through the front door and bring his arsenal with him

And it was designated a gun free zone and he did it anyway....moron......and he was the only one in there with guns while everyone else obeyed the law and were murdered because they had to leave their pistols at home......

 

[PredFan]

Why anyone would choose to live there is beyond me.

As opposed to living in backward ass Jesus-Land?

Where is that?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Take this to the SCOTUS. It's on our side,

 

[rightwinger]

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

That was the point I was making, he was not inside setting down in the theatre.
He broke in through one of the exits.

The point I was making is that without movie theaters being designated safe zones, he can come in through the front door and bring his arsenal with him

And it was designated a gun free zone and he did it anyway....moron......and he was the only one in there with guns while everyone else obeyed the law and were murdered because they had to leave their pistols at home......

So by your system ...he, and his little friend , will be invited in with open arms

Come on in Me Holmes
Can I help you with your Bushmaster?
I do believe we have some extra rounds in the snack bar

 

[peach174]

Why can't they just carry their concealed 9mm?

Why should anyone have to conceal?
Why not bring your favorite assault rifle with a sniper scope and a compass in the stock to your next sporting event?

Do you and your kids want to sit next to him?

I've sat next to CCW holders, worked next to CCW holders. Never had an issue.

It's amazing how scared you people are of your fellow citizens.

Are you and your kids going to sit next to this guy at the movie theater?

That was the point I was making, he was not inside setting down in the theatre.
He broke in through one of the exits.

The point I was making is that without movie theaters being designated safe zones, he can come in through the front door and bring his arsenal with him

No ,killers don't operate that way, they always need dramatics. People who murder are sick in the head.
You think they would be stealthy ,that's only in movies, not reality.

 

[JoeB131]

We don't have a popular vote, so that leaves- work to get the constitution changed or get over it.
Yes they did and we need to deal with it, as they did it to all democracies across the globe.
All government agencies have stated it did not change one single vote, because the individual votes was not done online.
If you think all of them are lying that's your problem.

the problem is, we know they are lying, because they are trying to throw that NSA Girl with the silly name in prison for exposing it. We don't know how much they've managed to hack into our elections. We do know that we can't do an actual recount in PA because they don't have paper ballots, but take our word for it, the Russians didn't change a single vote... no really.