Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The economy grew, 20+ million jobs were created, and the budget was balanced; all under the Clinton tax rates.
So it isn't the expiration of the Bush Tax Cuts® that would hold/are holding the economy back. That argument is for rubes with amnesia.
As long as libertarians and ultra right dooshes are allowed to sit at the policy-making conferences, America is in serious, serious trouble. I know at least 22 GoP Congressman that would vote for Plan B if Boehner brought it for an up or down vote.
Yes Fakey, Dick Tater. Only your weak knee'd, unprincipled type can sit at the table. And you offer up a "plan B" kick the can plan as relevant.
The economy grew, 20+ million jobs were created, and the budget was balanced; all under the Clinton tax rates.
So it isn't the expiration of the Bush Tax Cuts® that would hold/are holding the economy back. That argument is for rubes with amnesia.
If we use your logic then why not just tax everyone 90%
Think how much better the economy would be then...
Hey here's a thought....
Clinton had the benefit of the housing bubble.
Clinton had the benefit of the Dot Com bubble.
Clinton had Newt Gindrich in the House.
One option on the list is,
Keep subsidies for milk but not for oil
Why should we subsidize anything?
On CNBC today they said that without the milk subsidy milk would cost $6/gallon. I'm fine making sure that our kids get enough milk. I understand your point though, especially when you look at all subsidies. I don't get subsidizing illegal's education for example like Perry wanted to do.
The poll choices are inadequate.
I'd prefer to see federal spending rolled back to 2008 levels. We have a spending problem, exacerbated by the supposed temporary stimulus turning into structural spending (aided and abetted by the Dems refusal to pass a budget).
Roll it back.
It is simply freaky to think that the Federal gubmint almost doubled in size this century.
The poll choices are inadequate.
I'd prefer to see federal spending rolled back to 2008 levels. We have a spending problem, exacerbated by the supposed temporary stimulus turning into structural spending (aided and abetted by the Dems refusal to pass a budget).
Roll it back.
It is simply freaky to think that the Federal gubmint almost doubled in size this century.
Population...............more than tripled in the last one. Is that freaky?
The only time you will hear a Democrat declare that we cannot afford something is when it's 1) a military expenditure or 2) a tax cut.
CUT SPENDING!!!!
It is simply freaky to think that the Federal gubmint almost doubled in size this century.
Population...............more than tripled in the last one. Is that freaky?
Population doubled in 10 years, eh, moron?
LOL
Population...............more than tripled in the last one. Is that freaky?
Population doubled in 10 years, eh, moron?
LOL
In the last one........MORON
The only time you will hear a Democrat declare that we cannot afford something is when it's 1) a military expenditure or 2) a tax cut.
CUT SPENDING!!!!
Obama proposed we jack up military spending in his budget request!
Population doubled in 10 years, eh, moron?
LOL
In the last one........MORON
I said this century, you clueless fuck.
Get with the times. Join us.
LOL
Well, we can completely rule economic growth out of the equation for at least the next 4 years.
Nobody in their right mind would expand business in America unless they are chasing new gubmint dollars, and the sequester will go a long way toward shutting down that bubble.
Well, we can completely rule economic growth out of the equation for at least the next 4 years.
Nobody in their right mind would expand business in America unless they are chasing new gubmint dollars, and the sequester will go a long way toward shutting down that bubble.
The poll choices are inadequate.
I'd prefer to see federal spending rolled back to 2008 levels. We have a spending problem, exacerbated by the supposed temporary stimulus turning into structural spending (aided and abetted by the Dems refusal to pass a budget).
Roll it back.
It is simply freaky to think that the Federal gubmint almost doubled in size this century.
Population...............more than tripled in the last one. Is that freaky?
Democrats: Tax and Spend
Republicans: Borrow and Spend
Really? Then why has Obama pushed to raise the Debt Ceiling?
Well, we can completely rule economic growth out of the equation for at least the next 4 years.
Nobody in their right mind would expand business in America unless they are chasing new gubmint dollars, and the sequester will go a long way toward shutting down that bubble.
Ah yes, that terrible period from 1992 until 2001, when there was no economic growth because of the raise in taxes by the Clinton Administration. No jobs created, everybody's economic condition worsened.
Is that the way you see those years?
Democrats: Tax and Spend
Republicans: Borrow and Spend
Really? Then why has Obama pushed to raise the Debt Ceiling?
every president has raised the debt ceiling... and he has a larger issue in dealing with teatards who don't believe in revenue.
