Ok so please explain to me this?

[RetiredGySgt]

A better question is why does the left always claim they do the economy better when it's easy to point to FDR, Carter, LBJ and BO as examples that they don't?

I just PROVED to you with those stats that FDR, LBJ, and Carter were all better than every Republican. And you don't have any idea how Obama is gonna effect the economy so stop acting like your the nostrafuckingdamus of economic policy


See, its crap like that right there that just proves my point about some of you fascists

All you proved is as the years pass each successive President spent more. And more importantly since PRESIDENTS do not actually decide how much will be spent normally , that is a function of Congress, all you REALLY proved is that the Dem controlled Congress from 1952 to 1996 dramatically increased spending. And guess what? They are back in power and have KICK STARTED the new cycle of spending well beyond our means.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I just PROVED to you with those stats that FDR, LBJ, and Carter were all better than every Republican. And you don't have any idea how Obama is gonna effect the economy so stop acting like your the nostrafuckingdamus of economic policy


See, its crap like that right there that just proves my point about some of you fascists

I'm new to this site....but I'll just jump right in. You just proved what exactly? No idea of "how Obama is gonna effect the economy"? Well, maybe not. But this gives us a pretty good vision....

But Obama's presidency, not yet four months old, has put the government on track for a $1.8 trillion shortfall.

That's almost 13 percent of the nation's gross domestic product - a level not seen since 1945. By contrast, the 2008 deficit - for the budget year that ended last September - was a then-record $454.8 billion.

I have less than 15 posts on this site, therefore, I'm not permitted to post a link to other sites just yet. But you can find the above referenced at MiamiHerald.com. Yesterday's article titled: "Analysis: Obama moving to center on some issues.

Lay off the Kool Aid.

The Miami Herald is a leftwing rag. I worked there. I left journalism because of it. Try getting an objective source and I will post it for you.

Obama has us on course to put us further in debt than all the Presidents that preceeded him combined.

BUT that is GOOD, according to the Liberals and Obamabots. Spending under Bush bad... tripling spending under Obama, GOOD. At least according to Jillian and her fellow leftside dumb asses.

 

[DamnYankee]

I just PROVED to you with those stats that FDR, LBJ, and Carter were all better than every Republican.

No, you did not. You posted some stats that were debunked.

 

[DamnYankee]

Fucked up stats

Really....

An economic record of presidential ... - Google Book Search

A page from a book-sale site?
Are you serious?

I (seriously) presume that you're capable of checking the Bibliography (source references).

 

[DamnYankee]

Libertarians hate me because I'm a socialist; so-called "socialists" hate me because I'm a libertarian. What neither group realizes is that I simply support the purest manifestation of both of those ideals to have ever existed. As noted by the Political Compass analysis:

If it makes you feel any better, EVERYONE tells me I'm full of shit when I tell them I'm a centrist -- based on that test....

 

[bigdaddygtr]

I'm new to this site....but I'll just jump right in. You just proved what exactly? No idea of "how Obama is gonna effect the economy"? Well, maybe not. But this gives us a pretty good vision....

But Obama's presidency, not yet four months old, has put the government on track for a $1.8 trillion shortfall.

That's almost 13 percent of the nation's gross domestic product - a level not seen since 1945. By contrast, the 2008 deficit - for the budget year that ended last September - was a then-record $454.8 billion.

I have less than 15 posts on this site, therefore, I'm not permitted to post a link to other sites just yet. But you can find the above referenced at MiamiHerald.com. Yesterday's article titled: "Analysis: Obama moving to center on some issues.

Lay off the Kool Aid.

The Miami Herald is a leftwing rag. I worked there. I left journalism because of it. Try getting an objective source and I will post it for you.

Obama has us on course to put us further in debt than all the Presidents that preceeded him combined.

BUT that is GOOD, according to the Liberals and Obamabots. Spending under Bush bad... tripling spending under Obama, GOOD. At least according to Jillian and her fellow leftside dumb asses.

No, all I said is I dont know if this Obama spending is good or bad, but most of you that hate him already have decided its bad when you have NO IDEA

 

[Cigar Man]

I just PROVED to you with those stats that FDR, LBJ, and Carter were all better than every Republican. And you don't have any idea how Obama is gonna effect the economy so stop acting like your the nostrafuckingdamus of economic policy


See, its crap like that right there that just proves my point about some of you fascists

I'm new to this site....but I'll just jump right in. You just proved what exactly? No idea of "how Obama is gonna effect the economy"? Well, maybe not. But this gives us a pretty good vision....

But Obama's presidency, not yet four months old, has put the government on track for a $1.8 trillion shortfall.

That's almost 13 percent of the nation's gross domestic product - a level not seen since 1945. By contrast, the 2008 deficit - for the budget year that ended last September - was a then-record $454.8 billion.

I have less than 15 posts on this site, therefore, I'm not permitted to post a link to other sites just yet. But you can find the above referenced at MiamiHerald.com. Yesterday's article titled: "Analysis: Obama moving to center on some issues.

Lay off the Kool Aid.

The Miami Herald is a leftwing rag. I worked there. I left journalism because of it. Try getting an objective source and I will post it for you.

Obama has us on course to put us further in debt than all the Presidents that preceeded him combined.

I realize The Herald is a leftwing rag. It's a terrible excuse for a newspaper. But that's my point exactly. It came from a very liberal source. Furthermore, what they posted was not THEIR view on Obama. It is a fact that he is on pace to put government at that level of a shortfall. A level not seen since 1945.

 

[Agnapostate]

If it makes you feel any better, EVERYONE tells me I'm full of shit when I tell them I'm a centrist -- based on that test....

No, I like my score.

 

[Avatar4321]

No, all I said is I dont know if this Obama spending is good or bad, but most of you that hate him already have decided its bad when you have NO IDEA

If you don't know, then you obviously arent paying attention so why the heck should we listen to anything you say?

I don't hate Obama. I simply think it's insane to complain about overspending, which is a major problem, then turn around and propose triple the amount. More government never solves anything. It also really starts pissing people off.

 

[Harry Dresden]

I need to look at some IPs. I'm starting to think every leftwingnut on this board is one person with a lot of sockpuppets.

or the good citizens of BOBOSVILLE are paying a visit....

He has a whole town?

yup....i think Chris lives there,he may be the Mayor....just speculatin.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

You aren't a true anything. You're a wannabe.

Really? I used to be modest, but that got me nowhere. So I openly defy any rightist here to beat me in a debate about anarchism or socialism.

whos going to be the judge?....you?♠

 

[Barb]

Libertarians hate me because I'm a socialist; so-called "socialists" hate me because I'm a libertarian. What neither group realizes is that I simply support the purest manifestation of both of those ideals to have ever existed. As noted by the Political Compass analysis:

If it makes you feel any better, EVERYONE tells me I'm full of shit when I tell them I'm a centrist -- based on that test....

http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=-9.50&soc=-7.08

 

[Agnapostate]

http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=-9.50&soc=-7.08

Damn...nice. I've gotten a 9.5, but it ruins my perfect social libertarian score.

 

[WiseOldMan]

Most Republicans are:

Men.

Men with gay tendencies.

Men with gay tendencies who don't admit it.

Men who were tattletales in elementary school.

Men who are really fat and out of shape.


It's hard to be a conservative. Afterall, all the hot, young coeds in college are liberals, so all the conservative guys had to get with were.............other guys.


In my dorm, the flamboyant gay guy was..............drum roll....................REPUBLICAN.

 

[KittenKoder]

Most Republicans are:

Men.

Men with gay tendencies.

Men with gay tendencies who don't admit it.

Men who were tattletales in elementary school.

Men who are really fat and out of shape.


It's hard to be a conservative. Afterall, all the hot, young coeds in college are liberals, so all the conservative guys had to get with were.............other guys.


In my dorm, the flamboyant gay guy was..............drum roll....................REPUBLICAN.

Most Independents:

Are people who don't give a fuck ...

People who love to stir every wasps nest ...

People who were bullies or flunkies in school ...

People who are so sick of these stupid fucking lists!

 

[Harry Dresden]

Most Republicans are:

Men.

Men with gay tendencies.

Men with gay tendencies who don't admit it.

Men who were tattletales in elementary school.

Men who are really fat and out of shape.


It's hard to be a conservative. Afterall, all the hot, young coeds in college are liberals, so all the conservative guys had to get with were.............other guys.


In my dorm, the flamboyant gay guy was..............drum roll....................REPUBLICAN.

Most Independents:

Are people who don't give a fuck ...

People who love to stir every wasps nest ...

People who were bullies or flunkies in school ...

People who are so sick of these stupid fucking lists!

you gotta remember Kitty....you are conversing with a "WISE OLD MAN"

 

[garyd]

The problem sir is that given the fact that presidents who do not have like minded congresses can't have any major impact on the economy. And the Fact is that since 1932 the Democrats have controlled both houses of congress all but ten years out of the last 77. In terms of domestic economics the Congress holds all the cards. All of Reagan's budgets were DOA except a few items in the first. Neither Eisenhower, Nixon nor Ford were Fiscal conservatives in fact Nixon bragged about increasing social spending. Nor was either Bush. There is a reason that Newt Gingrich refered to the Bob Dole wing of the Republican party as the tax collectors for the Great Society.