Obamerican
Senior Member
- Aug 21, 2010
- 1,732
- 136
- 48
Of course, "fact driven", being ANYTHING where the end result is what YOU believe?Well said. If anybody wants to know what all the fuss is about, I suggest doing an internet search, it has most of the information to prepare one for coming on here. I would also fix my browser problem if You tube wont open.
So which site should they believe?
The site that says no planes were involved or the site that confirms planes were involved?
The site that says there were no hijackers and the planes involved were rogue aircraft or the one that confirms hijackers were involved?
The site that says bombs were in the towers or the site that says no bombs were in the towers or the site that says there was themite, the site that says there was thermate, or the site that now says nano-thermite?
The site that says phone calls were morphed (faked) or the site that confirms that the calls were real?
The site that says a missile hit the Pentagon, the site that says an A-3 Skywarrior was used, or the site that says it was a plane but not AA77. Should they belive the sites that say a plane was used to flyover the building to shield a missile attack--that theory was always my favorite.
What about the video a friend of yours brings up everyday that says that pods were under the planes used to hit the towers? Should they belive that site?
Should they believe the site that says remains were faked or should they belive the site that says the remains were never there to start with?
How about the sites that say Flight 93 was shot down although it has been proven mathematically that it could not have happened? What about the sites that say Bush was behind it? Should they believe them or the ones that say Wolfowitz was behind it? Or the ones that say it was the Rothchilds?
I think they could save a lot of trouble and ignore you and all of those sites and just read the 9/11 Commission Report which has all of the answers on the major events of the attack.
I would suggest you go to those sites seeking a fact driven re-investigation of 9/11