Poli_Sigh
Active Member
Oil Prices: Another Glaring Example of Liberal Hypocrisy
Oil prices top $104 a barrel, highest since 2008
NEW YORK — Oil prices rose past $104 a barrel to end the week at a 29-month high, as fighting in Libya intensified and the world's largest petroleum consumer, the U.S., reported that employers added nearly 200,000 new jobs in February.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/indust...l-friday_N.htm
when this happened under bush....you couldn't turn the channel or surf the net without hearing how this was all bush's fault. be it his ties to the oil companies or the undeclared wars in iraq and afghanistan (probably more iraq)....now....a dem president
i don't see or hear any blame thrown obama's way. the left was in an uproar the last time this happened. why the silence now? why does obama get a pass?
That's because it was Bush's fault. He invaded 2 separate countries and iniated some of the longest military actions in this nation's history.
And nothing President Obama has done caused oil prices to spike.
You're right. Bush did nothing to cause most of the crap they threw at him. The question is not iwhether or not Bush deserved the blame. The question is why did Bush get the Blame while Obama does not.
Compare the Katrina and the Deep water drilling disaster. Not the actual events, but the way they were reported and the slant taken by the reporting. Try the statements of the opposition party's elite.
Finally, with the current crisis in oil pricing, please explain which party has done the most to restrict drilling and homeland oil production.
In the 1970s Middle Eastern oil was selling for $3 a barrel and gas price per gallon was $0.27. The fact that we at that time almost entirely abandoned exploring or drilling for oil locally was not in response to any environmental concerns - it was in response to the vast chasm that existed between the cost of producing Arab oil vs. home grown oil. And the long-held knowledge that the Arab nations were sitting on just about all the oil that could be gotten to in the world, wasn't exactly a turn-off either.
No doubt one of the many reasons some offer the absurd notion that Bush and Cheney were among the 9/11 co-conspirators no doubt arises from their financial link to Middle Eastern oil.
It's obvious the Bush Administration downplayed the importance of investigating the exact nature of Saudi Arabian involvement in 9/11. Nurturing and maintaining friendship with the Saudi Arabians has long been an essential piece to ensuring our oil dependency needs would not be interrupted. So we ignored the elephant in the middle of the room (no pun intended) opting instead to pursue an unattainable myth (bin Laden) through an unobtainable territory (Afghanistan).
As is the nature of the history of the nation's of the world, America's ultimate fate may not be decided for decades to come or it may be decided within a few short years. We are no longer King of the Hill - and many of us don't find that a bad thing. I know I personally had become tired of being part of a modern Atlas holding up the world. But we must once again rise to the challenge of being masters of our own fates by demanding that the counter-productive political nonsense which has become doing business as usual in Washington D.C. cease and desist post haste. Otherwise should we continue along the polarized lines which have developed between the only two political views representing our interests, we will indeed be a house divided upon itself. And as perhaps our greatest President prophesied "... A house divided upon itself cannot stand - and upon that foundation do our enemies build their hopes of subduing us."
Last edited: