Oh-Oh, For Obamacare

It's pretty simple. The countries American corporate traitors outsource jobs to are human and environmental hell holes. Something you right wingers want to turn America into.

10483-India-Pollution-.jpg
india-air-pollution.jpg


2006_12_31_lahore_rubbish_pollution_520x390.JPG
monsoon-pollution-india.jpg


"We didn't inherit this land from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children."
Lakota Sioux Proverb

It's pretty simple. The countries American corporate traitors outsource jobs to are human and environmental hell holes. Something you right wingers want to turn America into.

:lol:sooo, prior to say 1970, our detritus, exhaust etc. all just magically flew off in the saddlebags of Unicorns?

oh and here we go with the weepy homilies, usually means someone is out of logic......

Educate yourself ...

Historical Photos and Images | About EPA | US EPA

Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement | Great Lakes | US EPA

Caring about the well being of other human beings and every living creature is not ' weepy homilies', it is the foundation of Christianity and the core beliefs this nation was founded on. It is We, the People, not I the person.

Your condemnation says more about you, and what you lack as a human being. Sad for you...

What you deny is the fact that we have layers of government that overlap what the EPA does. But carry on, nothing like a good fear mongering story from you.
 
:lol:sooo, prior to say 1970, our detritus, exhaust etc. all just magically flew off in the saddlebags of Unicorns?

oh and here we go with the weepy homilies, usually means someone is out of logic......

Educate yourself ...

Historical Photos and Images | About EPA | US EPA

Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement | Great Lakes | US EPA

Caring about the well being of other human beings and every living creature is not ' weepy homilies', it is the foundation of Christianity and the core beliefs this nation was founded on. It is We, the People, not I the person.

Your condemnation says more about you, and what you lack as a human being. Sad for you...

What you deny is the fact that we have layers of government that overlap what the EPA does. But carry on, nothing like a good fear mongering story from you.

No we don't have layers of government that overlap what the EPA does.

If you really want to eliminate layers of government that overlap what other agencies do, then Fatherland Security should be eliminated tomorrow.
 
Educate yourself ...

Historical Photos and Images | About EPA | US EPA

Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement | Great Lakes | US EPA

Caring about the well being of other human beings and every living creature is not ' weepy homilies', it is the foundation of Christianity and the core beliefs this nation was founded on. It is We, the People, not I the person.

Your condemnation says more about you, and what you lack as a human being. Sad for you...

What you deny is the fact that we have layers of government that overlap what the EPA does. But carry on, nothing like a good fear mongering story from you.

No we don't have layers of government that overlap what the EPA does.

If you really want to eliminate layers of government that overlap what other agencies do, then Fatherland Security should be eliminated tomorrow.

Keep denying it, BFGRN. Better to fear monger with your silly ass pictures, huh? :cuckoo:
 
What you deny is the fact that we have layers of government that overlap what the EPA does. But carry on, nothing like a good fear mongering story from you.

No we don't have layers of government that overlap what the EPA does.

If you really want to eliminate layers of government that overlap what other agencies do, then Fatherland Security should be eliminated tomorrow.

Keep denying it, BFGRN. Better to fear monger with your silly ass pictures, huh? :cuckoo:

No, it's better to be ignorant like you...ignorance is bliss.

The EPA is undermanned and underfunded. The Bush administration eviscerated the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and every environmental law on the books. He set it up so major polluters will NEVER be required to clean up their toxins, and any polluter can now dump waste in any stream in this country by simply filing for a permit from the Corp of Engineers through the mail.

If the American people knew and understood the human toll his policies will cause, he and Cheney would meet the same fate as Mussolini.
 
No we don't have layers of government that overlap what the EPA does.

If you really want to eliminate layers of government that overlap what other agencies do, then Fatherland Security should be eliminated tomorrow.

Keep denying it, BFGRN. Better to fear monger with your silly ass pictures, huh? :cuckoo:

No, it's better to be ignorant like you...ignorance is bliss.

The EPA is undermanned and underfunded. The Bush administration eviscerated the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and every environmental law on the books. He set it up so major polluters will NEVER be required to clean up their toxins, and any polluter can now dump waste in any stream in this country by simply filing for a permit from the Corp of Engineers through the mail.

If the American people knew and understood the human toll his policies will cause, he and Cheney would meet the same fate as Mussolini.
Hyperbolic idiot is hyperbolic.
 
Keep denying it, BFGRN. Better to fear monger with your silly ass pictures, huh? :cuckoo:

No, it's better to be ignorant like you...ignorance is bliss.

The EPA is undermanned and underfunded. The Bush administration eviscerated the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and every environmental law on the books. He set it up so major polluters will NEVER be required to clean up their toxins, and any polluter can now dump waste in any stream in this country by simply filing for a permit from the Corp of Engineers through the mail.

If the American people knew and understood the human toll his policies will cause, he and Cheney would meet the same fate as Mussolini.
Hyperbolic idiot is hyperbolic.

logo.gif


Bush's sorry environmental record
by Former EPA Administrator Russell Train and former New Hampshire State Senator Rick Russman, both REP members
published September 23, 2004 in the Concord (NH) Monitor

Except in a few instances, the environmental policies of the Bush administration are a disgrace.

As lifelong Republicans who have worked for decades to protect and restore clean air and clean water, we find the turning back of the environmental clock by this administration profoundly disturbing. And New Hampshire suffers from these backward policies.

Republican President Richard Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency. In his 1970 State of the Union message, he called the environmental cause "as fundamental as life itself." With bipartisan leadership in Congress, Nixon initiated many of the environmental protections we enjoy today.

Republican President George H.W. Bush signed the Clean Air Act of 1990, one of the most protective environmental statutes.

Unfortunately, President George W. Bush's administration is reversing course from 30 years of bipartisan leadership to protect our health and environment.

The administration's policies to promote energy, mining and timber interests with little regard for the interests of common citizens represent a throwback to an era of exploitation. The administration's assault on the environment has increased pollution and health threats in New Hampshire, according to a report by Environment2004.

The administration weakened the Clean Air Act to allow aging power plants to continue spewing sulfur, mercury and other contaminants into the skies. These end up in New Hampshire's air and waters. This pollution from Midwestern power plants and other sources forms smog that threatens the 65,000 New Hampshire residents who suffer from asthma. It falls as acid rain that damages New Hampshire's forests and waters.

Mercury pollution has forced New Hampshire to establish a fish consumption advisory that covers all its lakes and rivers. Infants, children, pregnant women and women of child-bearing age are particularly vulnerable to mercury. Mercury affects a child's ability to learn, most notably impairing memory, attention and fine motor function.

New Hampshire's drinking water is threatened by the Bush administration. Fifteen percent of New Hampshire's public water supplies and thousands of its private wells are contaminated by the fuel additive MtBE. Recent studies show that MtBE may cause cancer, and it makes drinking water smell and taste foul even at low levels, yet the administration has not banned its use.

To pay for the cleanup of this contamination, New Hampshire sued 22 oil companies responsible for MtBE contamination. Nonetheless, the Bush administration's energy bill would block these suits and force New Hampshire taxpayers to foot the bill for cleaning up the state's contaminated drinking water. The industry contributed $338,000 to the Bush presidential campaign and Republican congressional candidates in 1999 and 2000.

Republican Sens. Judd Gregg and John Sununu fervently oppose this policy.

The administration has adopted these and other policies based on the advice of its industry allies instead of the EPA's scientists and experts. Its proposed mercury policy would delay significant mercury reduction until 2018. This was lifted from the utility industry's recommendations while the administration ignored the EPA's children's health protection experts.

This is but one example of the administration disregarding scientific guidance - a radical change from previous Republican and Democratic administrations.

There was no mandate in the 2000 election to weaken and undo our environmental and public health protections. In this year's election, environmental policy needs a full public debate.

61.html
 
Now that we passed it we are finding out what's in it. :lol:

AP: Glitch in Obamacare would place couples earning up to $64,000 in Medicaid

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's health care law would let several million middle-class people get nearly free insurance meant for the poor, a twist government number crunchers say they discovered only after the complex bill was signed.
The change would affect early retirees: A married couple could have an annual income of about $64,000 and still get Medicaid, said officials who make long-range cost estimates for the Health and Human Services department.

"The fact that this is being discovered now tells you, what else is baked into this law?" said Leavitt, who served as Health and Human Services secretary under President George H.W. Bush. "It clearly begins to reveal that the nature of the law was to put more and more people under eligibility for government insurance."
That $64,000 would put them at about four times the federal poverty level, which for a two-person household is $14,710 this year. The Medicaid expansion in the health care law was supposed to benefit childless adults with incomes up to 133 percent of the poverty level. A fudge factor built into the law bumps that up to 138 percent.


Read more: APNewsBreak: A twist in Obama's health care law | AP Business News - The News Tribune

So? Do you believe such corrections are only needed for this bill? You post will create a huge echo, I'm sure (I've only read your post #1 meister) but suspect the hue and cry will be loud and punctuated with the melodramatic.
 
Now that we passed it we are finding out what's in it. :lol:

AP: Glitch in Obamacare would place couples earning up to $64,000 in Medicaid

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's health care law would let several million middle-class people get nearly free insurance meant for the poor, a twist government number crunchers say they discovered only after the complex bill was signed.
The change would affect early retirees: A married couple could have an annual income of about $64,000 and still get Medicaid, said officials who make long-range cost estimates for the Health and Human Services department.

"The fact that this is being discovered now tells you, what else is baked into this law?" said Leavitt, who served as Health and Human Services secretary under President George H.W. Bush. "It clearly begins to reveal that the nature of the law was to put more and more people under eligibility for government insurance."
That $64,000 would put them at about four times the federal poverty level, which for a two-person household is $14,710 this year. The Medicaid expansion in the health care law was supposed to benefit childless adults with incomes up to 133 percent of the poverty level. A fudge factor built into the law bumps that up to 138 percent.


Read more: APNewsBreak: A twist in Obama's health care law | AP Business News - The News Tribune

So? Do you believe such corrections are only needed for this bill? You post will create a huge echo, I'm sure (I've only read your post #1 meister) but suspect the hue and cry will be loud and punctuated with the melodramatic.

Tissue? :eusa_eh:
 
Yeah, yeah, Bush wanted to kill us all for profit and oil and just because. :cuckoo:

There is nothing that can penetrate your dogma, ignorance and Bush worship, even Republicans calling Bush out is dismissed...

Hey Monica, write Bush a letter, maybe he'll let you suck his dick...
 
Now that we passed it we are finding out what's in it. :lol:

AP: Glitch in Obamacare would place couples earning up to $64,000 in Medicaid

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's health care law would let several million middle-class people get nearly free insurance meant for the poor, a twist government number crunchers say they discovered only after the complex bill was signed.
The change would affect early retirees: A married couple could have an annual income of about $64,000 and still get Medicaid, said officials who make long-range cost estimates for the Health and Human Services department.

"The fact that this is being discovered now tells you, what else is baked into this law?" said Leavitt, who served as Health and Human Services secretary under President George H.W. Bush. "It clearly begins to reveal that the nature of the law was to put more and more people under eligibility for government insurance."
That $64,000 would put them at about four times the federal poverty level, which for a two-person household is $14,710 this year. The Medicaid expansion in the health care law was supposed to benefit childless adults with incomes up to 133 percent of the poverty level. A fudge factor built into the law bumps that up to 138 percent.


Read more: APNewsBreak: A twist in Obama's health care law | AP Business News - The News Tribune

So? Do you believe such corrections are only needed for this bill? You post will create a huge echo, I'm sure (I've only read your post #1 meister) but suspect the hue and cry will be loud and punctuated with the melodramatic.

This coming from the left wing partisan hack. :cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top