Oh...it's not a 'baby' or a 'person' - it's just a FETUS...a clump of tissue!

Status
Not open for further replies.

dmp

Senior Member
May 12, 2004
13,088
750
48
Enterprise, Alabama
:rolleyes:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40024

Aborted baby's head left inside woman
Couple horrified to find face of child after returning home

DavinaChambers.jpg


A British hospital is now investigating the case of a woman who had an abortion, but then was shocked to find out the head of her unborn baby had been left inside her.

Davina Chambers, 29, became pregnant this year with her fourth child, but she had just been diagnosed with autoimmune hepatitis, a disease eating away at her liver.

In January, I was a patient at King's College Hospital because I was jaundiced," Chambers told the Voice, which bills itself as Britain's best black newspaper. "The doctors wanted me to stay in the hospital, but after a week I told them that they had to let me out because I had to go home to take care of my three children. My children have always been my priorities. They're my angels."

Chambers became an outpatient at the facility, going in for checkups every two weeks as she needed continual monitoring.

It was during routine medical tests she discovered she was 12 weeks pregnant.

"At the time I was taking eight tablets a day and had all this radiation from the scans, so I couldn't believe that I could be pregnant," she told the paper.

Chambers made the difficult decision to have an abortion.

"I started thinking about it. Here I am very ill, already with three children, and I was very depressed because of the medication I was on."

She was booked into the hospital for the procedure, and even chose to have a coil contraceptive inserted to prevent any future pregnancies.

"When I woke up on the ward, they said that I had had three scans and everything was fine," she told the Voice.

But once she returned home, an unseemly problem began to make itself known.

"At midnight, my ex-partner knocked on the door to check if I was all right. ... I went to the bathroom and as I was sitting there, I just felt something slip out of me as if I had just given birth. I looked in the toilet and saw this lump that seemed to have a bone in it. So I showed it to my former partner."

The couple realized they were looking at the face of their unborn child, seeing the eyes, nose, mouth and ears. The tiny head measured no more than 4 centimeters.

"We just broke down and cried at what we were seeing. We couldn't believe it," Chambers sobbed to the paper.

"I phoned an ambulance and they took me to the hospital to make sure that no other parts were left inside of me. They said I could have died if it had stayed inside me."

She was able to discuss the situation with the doctor who had performed her abortion.

"He leaned over my bedside and said, 'I am so sorry. In all the procedures I've done, I've never come across this,'" she said. "He even tried to take the head away, but I said I wanted to keep it because we wanted to have a proper burial."

A distraught Chambers is now seeking legal advice on what to do next.

"I feel as if I'm going insane now; I can't just let this happen to me," she said.

A spokeswoman for King's College Hospital told the Voice: "We are aware of this patient and we did receive a complaint. We are now investigating but we cannot release any information until our investigation is complete."
 
:wtf: They really did't have to include a pic of the fetus did they?
 
My God,that is horrible!! I can't even imagine. I wonder if this would make anyone think twice......
 
krisy said:
My God,that is horrible!! I can't even imagine. I wonder if this would make anyone think twice......

I think the picture of that BABY'S face really tells it all!
That makes me heartsick!!!!
 
fembot said:
:wtf: They really did't have to include a pic of the fetus did they?

Why not? To cover up the awful truth about abortions? Actually more pictures like this should be shown to the public so they learn the real truth about abortions.

Why do you think they call it "pro-choice" instead of "baby killing" which is the real truth of the matter? It takes the sting out of the issue, distances one from reality, makes one feel proud to have a "choice", and many young ignorant mothers are fooled and don't truely realize what they are really doing.

Just a "mass" of "fetal material"? Hardly.

How many millions of little bodies have been cut and torn from the bodies of women who have fallen under the political belief that they have the "right" to kill their own child? It is really too ghastly to contemplate.
 
ScreamingEagle said:
Why not? To cover up the awful truth about abortions? Actually more pictures like this should be shown to the public so they learn the real truth about abortions.

Why do you think they call it "pro-choice" instead of "baby killing" which is the real truth of the matter? It takes the sting out of the issue, distances one from reality, makes one feel proud to have a "choice", and many young ignorant mothers are fooled and don't truely realize what they are really doing.

Just a "mass" of "fetal material"? Hardly.

How many millions of little bodies have been cut and torn from the bodies of women who have fallen under the political belief that they have the "right" to kill their own child? It is really too ghastly to contemplate.

Put exactly right!!!!!! That's how the left operates, change the wording and hide the real truth, takes the sting out of the horror of it all.........
 
Bonnie said:
Put exactly right!!!!!! That's how the left operates, change the wording and hide the real truth, takes the sting out of the horror of it all.........

Oh PLEASE!!!!! Like the GOP doesn't change words to take the sting out of a horrible act?
 
DKSuddeth said:
Oh PLEASE!!!!! Like the GOP doesn't change words to take the sting out of a horrible act?

Why is it now about democrats and republicans? I know left-leaning Republicans.

(shrug).
 
DKSuddeth said:
because 'left' and 'right' imply that one side is wrong and i'm not down with that.

Okay then how would you classify for purposes of this discussion?? The terms Left and Right are certainly not ones that I just came up with.
 
Bonnie said:
Okay then how would you classify for purposes of this discussion?? The terms Left and Right are certainly not ones that I just came up with.

classify with the same terms we've been using for two decades now. Pro-life and Pro-choice. There are actually some republicans out there that are pro-choice just as there are democrats that are pro-life.
 
DKSuddeth said:
classify with the same terms we've been using for two decades now. Pro-life and Pro-choice. There are actually some republicans out there that are pro-choice just as there are democrats that are pro-life.
Exactly why "that's what Liberals do - they change words, like 'homosexual' into 'gay', and Pro-Killing-Babies into 'Pro-Choice'.

Conservatives - Democrats or Republicans - are not advocating killing kids, or committing other attrocities and re-labeling them so they 'sound nicer' -
 
DKSuddeth said:
classify with the same terms we've been using for two decades now. Pro-life and Pro-choice. There are actually some republicans out there that are pro-choice just as there are democrats that are pro-life.

Okay, but I prefer Pro-Life and Pro-Abortion, so Ill stick with those terms.
And yes I have known some pro-abortion Republicans as well as pro-life Democrats, but I don't remember stating that I thought this issue came down to Rep vs Dems but more a liberal vs conservative battle.
And on that notion I have known very few Liberals who are against abortion and many more Conservatives who are.

If you know of liberals who are pro-life then I say to them welcome aboard, the more the merrier!!
 
-=d=- said:
Exactly why "that's what Liberals do - they change words, like 'homosexual' into 'gay', and Pro-Killing-Babies into 'Pro-Choice'.

Conservatives - Democrats or Republicans - are not advocating killing kids, or committing other attrocities and re-labeling them so they 'sound nicer' -

and they also use terms like 'collateral damage' and 'necessary evil' when the deaths of innocent civilians occur during errant bomb lobbing into crowded cities. They also like to use 'context' and 'perspective' when trying to downplay or minimize normally horrific actions perpetrated by their own.
 
Bonnie said:
Okay, but I prefer Pro-Life and Pro-Abortion, so Ill stick with those terms.
And yes I have known some pro-abortion Republicans as well as pro-life Democrats, but I don't remember stating that I thought this issue came down to Rep vs Dems but more a liberal vs conservative battle.
And on that notion I have known very few Liberals who are against abortion and many more Conservatives who are.

If you know of liberals who are pro-life then I say to them welcome aboard, the more the merrier!!

then what would you say to 'pro-choice', or pro-abortion, republicans? Get the hell out?
 
DKSuddeth said:
then what would you say to 'pro-choice', or pro-abortion, republicans? Get the hell out?


Get out of what???? Im not following where you are going with this, other than to say I would not tell anyone to get out of particular party for any reason. I would try and use reason to talk them into seeing things I take very seriously my way. For me it's not about getting even, it's trying to win the argument, if possible.
 
DKSuddeth said:
then what would you say to 'pro-choice', or pro-abortion, republicans? Get the hell out?


Get the hell out of where?

Liberals are 'pro-abortion'.

Conservatives are 'not'.

Whether they be democrat or republican; the position to support Abortion due to inconvenience of the mother is morally wrong.
 
Bonnie said:
Get out of what???? Im not following where you are going with this, other than to say I would not tell anyone to get out of particular party for any reason. I would try and use reason to talk them into seeing things I take very seriously my way. For me it's not about getting even, it's trying to win the argument, if possible.

out of the party IS where I was headed with this. Using 'reason' to talk them into seeing things your way is all well and good but if they choose to retain their pro-choice stance would they still be considered a conservative in your view?
 
-=d=- said:
Get the hell out of where?

Liberals are 'pro-abortion'.

Conservatives are 'not'.

Whether they be democrat or republican; the position to support Abortion due to inconvenience of the mother is morally wrong.

so you boil the 'conservative' position as ONLY prolife, all others are just minor flavors and not TRUE conservatives? The person who's for tax cuts, free markets, pro-democracy and individual freedom but maintains a pro-choice view is just a wanna-be conservative, right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top