Oh Dear...The facts get in the way again.

He did not even have enough evidence to charge much less try to convict Libby of it. Explain again how, if Libby did not disclose her knowingly as a covert agent, he was then ordered to do so By Cheney? And why Rove was not charged either, he admitted he told someone she worked for the CIA after all.


Libby and Rove BOTH intentionally leaked her name to the press. Rove with Cooper and Novak, libby as the confirmation leaker and Libby with Judith Miller.

Both, before the Novak story.

Libby and Rove BOTH knew her position was classified, because in the classified document that named her, she also had SECRET stamped next to her name.

Please, STOP with the bullshit that they did not know it was CLASSIFIED information that they were leaking.

This evedence was submitted in the trial.

READ THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS PLEASE!!!! Then you wouldn't appear to be such a fool, pretty please retsgt, read it!!!
 
Still waiting for one shred of evidence that Libby, Rove or Cheney KNEW she was a covert agent AND disclosed that status. In fact the results of the trial indicate LIBBY did NOT disclose her as a covert agent, nor meet the requirements to be charged with doing so. Or are you claiming the prosecutor was a Bush stoolie that didn't make the charge to protect someone?

As for the above drival.... Explain again how one is a COVERT asset being actively protected, traveling at times undercover with her real name when all one need do is call the switchboard and they would gladly tell you she was IN FACT an employee of the CIA? So much for undercover. So much for being hidden as an asset of the CIA.

The above is nothing more than the opinion of the DCI, and it must be a weak opinion since the prosecutor wouldn't even risk having it tested in court against Libby.

You people keep making spurious claims against people that have NEVER been charged at all. Remind me again about how our legal system works? What was the standard again? Innocent until proven guilty? Well I guess that only applies if your a Democrat caught on tape arranging bribes, receiving money and the money is found hidden in your house.

Did you EVER provide a link for your switchboard comment to PROVE you are not passing a LIE?
 
Libby and Rove BOTH intentionally leaked her name to the press. Rove with Cooper and Novak, libby as the confirmation leaker and Libby with Judith Miller.

Both, before the Novak story.

Libby and Rove BOTH knew her position was classified, because in the classified document that named her, she also had SECRET stamped next to her name.

Please, STOP with the bullshit that they did not know it was CLASSIFIED information that they were leaking.

This evedence was submitted in the trial.

READ THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS PLEASE!!!! Then you wouldn't appear to be such a fool, pretty please retsgt, read it!!!

You haven't a clue do you? Where a classification appears on a document has NOTHING to do with specific portions or names in the document. A classified Document does NOT have seperate classification stamps next to what on the document is classified. Again using your logic her husband and anyone else named in the document were Covert. I must have been covert also because my name has appeared in classified documents.

More importantly, SINCE Libby does not have to admit he told anyone she was covert in order to be charged with the crime, WHY wasn't he charged? Rove ADMITTED he told people she worked for the CIA, WHY wasn't he charged? Armitage admitted he told people she worked for the CIA, WHY wasn't he charged?

YOU stated previously that Libby SPECIFICALLY told reporters she was Covert. You did not say anything about this delusion of yours that where a stamp of classification appears on a document meant she was covet, YOU said LIBBY TOLD REPORTERS SHE WAS COVERT. Why wasn't he charged? You listed at least 3 witnesses that could cooberate your claim he told them she was COVERT. Ever since you have been unable to prove it or explain why if true he wasn't charged.

Why is that?
 

Forum List

Back
Top