- Jan 8, 2007
- 30,528
- 2,263
- 1,045
This isn't the same America that it was 20 years ago that was serious about being a superpower if Obama is reelected. We have become France.
so, are you going to go shoot some muslim ******* when Obama wins?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This isn't the same America that it was 20 years ago that was serious about being a superpower if Obama is reelected. We have become France.
I read the transcripts of the Rose Garden speech, and The President did call it a terrorist attack. The only one lying, was Romney and the moderator called him out. Instantly.
I'm voting for Romney, that's pretty much a given. I called this debate a draw though and it all comes down to the next debate to sway those who are undecided or leaning on way or the other.
Plus, the millions of commercials that will air the week leading up to the election, lol. I can't wait until November 7th when all these damn commercials STOP!!!
The liberal pundits (and their stacked polling?) seem to have reached a consensus: they imagine that the President "won" the debate.
I call it a draw. But I do note that after his hideous FIRST DEBATE performance, a draw looks like a huge win for The ONE.
Some shitheads (like an "analysis" I just looked at in The Washington Compost) seem to believe that the President won a surprising point over Benghazi with an assist from the moderator.
WE know the President lied. Now we just have to keep making note of it. It's HIS transcript. He's stuck with it.
The liberal pundits (and their stacked polling?) seem to have reached a consensus: they imagine that the President "won" the debate.
I call it a draw. But I do note that after his hideous FIRST DEBATE performance, a draw looks like a huge win for The ONE.
Some shitheads (like an "analysis" I just looked at in The Washington Compost) seem to believe that the President won a surprising point over Benghazi with an assist from the moderator.
WE know the President lied. Now we just have to keep making note of it. It's HIS transcript. He's stuck with it.
Can you fathom a reality in which you actually admit Obama won this debate? Could that man shit gold without your kind insisting that he shat lead?
The Dear Leader was underwhelming. Bottom line is, if you want more of this misery, Obama's your man. If you want something different, Romney's your man. And i think Romney did well expressing that sentiment.
The liberal pundits (and their stacked polling?) seem to have reached a consensus: they imagine that the President "won" the debate.
I call it a draw. But I do note that after his hideous FIRST DEBATE performance, a draw looks like a huge win for The ONE.
Some shitheads (like an "analysis" I just looked at in The Washington Compost) seem to believe that the President won a surprising point over Benghazi with an assist from the moderator.
WE know the President lied. Now we just have to keep making note of it. It's HIS transcript. He's stuck with it.
Can you fathom a reality in which you actually admit Obama won this debate? Could that man shit gold without your kind insisting that he shat lead?
Sure. If he HAD won.
He didn't.
It's like the eternal mystery of an asshole like you ever admitting that he didn't win.
Considering 3/4 of the board is RW, pretty obvious who won!
On 9/12, Obama said "No acts of terror" would stop us. Of course it was a terrorist act, whether spontaneous, semi-spontaneous, or long planned. The video DID cause demonstrations in 20+ other countries, so hardly surprising there was confusion out of the anarchy of Bengazi. DESPITE all the Pubcrappe from the Pub propaganda machine.
I'm voting for Romney, that's pretty much a given. I called this debate a draw though and it all comes down to the next debate to sway those who are undecided or leaning on way or the other.
Plus, the millions of commercials that will air the week leading up to the election, lol. I can't wait until November 7th when all these damn commercials STOP!!!
it all comes down to the next debate to sway those who are undecided or leaning on way or the other.
most people should already know where these two guys stand on things and who they are going to vote for......if a dumbass debate decides who you are going to vote for,then those individuals are just as flip floppy as Romney is.......
Can you fathom a reality in which you actually admit Obama won this debate? Could that man shit gold without your kind insisting that he shat lead?
Sure. If he HAD won.
He didn't.
It's like the eternal mystery of an asshole like you ever admitting that he didn't win.
This is the difference between your kind and my kind: We readily admitted that Obama sucked during the first debate and Romney won it while your kind won't admit defeat to the point of glibness. Obama stomped a mudhole in the ass of Romney tonight and it's telling that, after the fact, all your kind can do is blame the moderator and the media that won't force reality into your obstinate and jaded outlook on this election.
Romney won simply because of the outrageous lies Obama said about Energy, and Libya.
It's quite evident that Obama was lying through his teeth. See the info on Land permits. Offshore permits cut by 2/3rd for offshore and 1/3rd for land under Oblamer. Then there was the Libya business. Why did Obama send Rice to 5 TV stations to lie for him?
Obama lied because your right wing Gods told you he did? That 'facts' that the right wing puts out there as the 'truth'. Guess what. It's not.
Sure. If he HAD won.
He didn't.
It's like the eternal mystery of an asshole like you ever admitting that he didn't win.
This is the difference between your kind and my kind: We readily admitted that Obama sucked during the first debate and Romney won it while your kind won't admit defeat to the point of glibness. Obama stomped a mudhole in the ass of Romney tonight and it's telling that, after the fact, all your kind can do is blame the moderator and the media that won't force reality into your obstinate and jaded outlook on this election.
YOu had no choice but to admit that Obama sucked dog dick in that first debate.
But you DO have the option of admitting THIS time that he failed to "win" it.
He didn't.
But you won't admit it.
That's the difference. You are dishonest.
This is the difference between your kind and my kind: We readily admitted that Obama sucked during the first debate and Romney won it while your kind won't admit defeat to the point of glibness. Obama stomped a mudhole in the ass of Romney tonight and it's telling that, after the fact, all your kind can do is blame the moderator and the media that won't force reality into your obstinate and jaded outlook on this election.
YOu had no choice but to admit that Obama sucked dog dick in that first debate.
But you DO have the option of admitting THIS time that he failed to "win" it.
He didn't.
But you won't admit it.
That's the difference. You are dishonest.
We're just more honest than you are, dude. bottom line. Obama could literally cure cancer and you'd be pissed off that he put chemo technicians out of work. Fact.
please, tell me more about how much 4 more minutes of talk time caused Mittens to keep from knocking Obama out!
This is the difference between your kind and my kind: We readily admitted that Obama sucked during the first debate and Romney won it while your kind won't admit defeat to the point of glibness. Obama stomped a mudhole in the ass of Romney tonight and it's telling that, after the fact, all your kind can do is blame the moderator and the media that won't force reality into your obstinate and jaded outlook on this election.
YOu had no choice but to admit that Obama sucked dog dick in that first debate.
But you DO have the option of admitting THIS time that he failed to "win" it.
He didn't.
But you won't admit it.
That's the difference. You are dishonest.
We're just more honest than you are, dude. bottom line. Obama could literally cure cancer and you'd be pissed off that he put chemo technicians out of work. Fact.
please, tell me more about how much 4 more minutes of talk time caused Mittens to keep from knocking Obama out!
YOu had no choice but to admit that Obama sucked dog dick in that first debate.
But you DO have the option of admitting THIS time that he failed to "win" it.
He didn't.
But you won't admit it.
That's the difference. You are dishonest.
We're just more honest than you are, dude. bottom line. Obama could literally cure cancer and you'd be pissed off that he put chemo technicians out of work. Fact.
please, tell me more about how much 4 more minutes of talk time caused Mittens to keep from knocking Obama out!
Clearly not. You are lying even as you make your false claim of being "honest."
President Totus McFlatulence did NOT win tonight's debate EXCEPT in the very limited sense of managing NOT to be the asshole flop he was in debate #1. You guys were so hungry for a "win," you embrace his outright lies and label a a draw a "win."
We're just more honest than you are, dude. bottom line. Obama could literally cure cancer and you'd be pissed off that he put chemo technicians out of work. Fact.
please, tell me more about how much 4 more minutes of talk time caused Mittens to keep from knocking Obama out!
Clearly not. You are lying even as you make your false claim of being "honest."
President Totus McFlatulence did NOT win tonight's debate EXCEPT in the very limited sense of managing NOT to be the asshole flop he was in debate #1. You guys were so hungry for a "win," you embrace his outright lies and label a a draw a "win."
our accusations of lying hit about as hard as crying foul about moderators and the media.
you wound me, sir!
trust me, dude, in the next few days you'll find yourself screaming to high hell about the media calling it for Obama. You and Charles Krauthammer can console each other over a nice scotch on the rocks and a stogey.
Clearly not. You are lying even as you make your false claim of being "honest."
President Totus McFlatulence did NOT win tonight's debate EXCEPT in the very limited sense of managing NOT to be the asshole flop he was in debate #1. You guys were so hungry for a "win," you embrace his outright lies and label a a draw a "win."
our accusations of lying hit about as hard as crying foul about moderators and the media.
you wound me, sir!
trust me, dude, in the next few days you'll find yourself screaming to high hell about the media calling it for Obama. You and Charles Krauthammer can console each other over a nice scotch on the rocks and a stogey.
You are a crashing bore and quite totally and obviously dishonest, but the "debate" was what it was. A fucked-up format, a lousy and biased moderator a dishonest piece of shit incumbent and a couple of decent moments marred by the lies of the incumbent and that shitty moderator.
I realize how desperately a loser tool like you NEEDS to believe that The ONE got some kind of telling and decisive win.
But your belief is strictly delusional.
It was still just a draw and the President did lie. The White House transcript of what he DID say on 9/12/2012 PROVES it.