Official Thread for Denial of GreenHouse Effect and Radiative Physics.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Still no evidence they emit, funny, you keep striking out

Yep...they will show you book after book after book and model after model and tell you what "everyone" believes...what they won't show you is actual evidence...that used to be what physics was all about...before the post modern age that is...now it is about protecting the dogma, and inventing particles and mechanics to explain away everything that contradicts the dogma..

Yep...they will show you book after book after book and model after model and tell you what "everyone" believes...

And then there is you, telling us what no one believes.

what they won't show you is actual evidence...

Did you ever find that evidence for "objects at equilibrium cease emissions"? No? Weird.

I'm letting everyone know that you have no observed evidence to support your dogma. Just so we're clear.

Right. Stefan-Boltzmann was derived with no observed evidence...…..durr

post it!!! the evidence.

Here's the important part......

The law was almost immediately experimentally verified.

Good luck with your research. And post Dr. Raeder's response.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

JC is dumber than SSDD so finds it more difficult to defend the epicycles.

you think cold objects heat up warmer objects, I'd say you have the lead on stupid.

you think cold objects heat up warmer objects,

I do? Nah. You're lying.

nope, I am a very honest person. I admit my mistakes when I make one. So far I've been waiting for you to post the observation that proves me wrong. Until then it is what it is., you should learn how that's done.

nope, I am a very honest person.

Excellent. Then you can link to the post where I said, "cold objects heat up warmer objects".

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects? if so, there you go!!!

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects?

Only if they're above absolute zero. Because....Stefan-Boltzmann.

 

[jc456]

Yep...they will show you book after book after book and model after model and tell you what "everyone" believes...what they won't show you is actual evidence...that used to be what physics was all about...before the post modern age that is...now it is about protecting the dogma, and inventing particles and mechanics to explain away everything that contradicts the dogma..

Yep...they will show you book after book after book and model after model and tell you what "everyone" believes...

And then there is you, telling us what no one believes.

what they won't show you is actual evidence...

Did you ever find that evidence for "objects at equilibrium cease emissions"? No? Weird.

I'm letting everyone know that you have no observed evidence to support your dogma. Just so we're clear.

Right. Stefan-Boltzmann was derived with no observed evidence...…..durr

post it!!! the evidence.

View attachment 272929

Here's the important part......

The law was almost immediately experimentally verified.

Good luck with your research. And post Dr. Raeders response.

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD, where is it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Sun shining through the corona, the Earth radiating through the thermosphere, the atmosphere radiating toward the surface. All examples of cooler matter radiating at warmer matter.

no scientist on this planet knows what is happening on the sun, are you saying you know more than any other scientist? wow!!! so you should write that text book

no scientist on this planet knows what is happening on the sun,

Link?

Why is the sun's corona the hottest layer when it is farther from the sun's core than other layers are?

The corona is hotter than the surface?
That's weird, according to SSDD, that would prevent the surface from emitting.
Was he correct? Or does the surface emit?

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening and I will respond afterward.

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening

The Sun radiates through the hotter corona. Obviously.

Because......wait for it......Stefan-Boltzmann.

 

[jc456]

you think cold objects heat up warmer objects, I'd say you have the lead on stupid.

you think cold objects heat up warmer objects,

I do? Nah. You're lying.

nope, I am a very honest person. I admit my mistakes when I make one. So far I've been waiting for you to post the observation that proves me wrong. Until then it is what it is., you should learn how that's done.

nope, I am a very honest person.

Excellent. Then you can link to the post where I said, "cold objects heat up warmer objects".

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects? if so, there you go!!!

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects?

Only if they're above absolute zero. Because....Stefan-Boltzmann.

Yep I completely agree with that, except when surrounded by warmer objects. so the question was does the cold object still radiate around warmer objects? you ricocheted away from my question.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yep...they will show you book after book after book and model after model and tell you what "everyone" believes...

And then there is you, telling us what no one believes.

what they won't show you is actual evidence...

Did you ever find that evidence for "objects at equilibrium cease emissions"? No? Weird.

I'm letting everyone know that you have no observed evidence to support your dogma. Just so we're clear.

Right. Stefan-Boltzmann was derived with no observed evidence...…..durr

post it!!! the evidence.

View attachment 272929

Here's the important part......

The law was almost immediately experimentally verified.

Good luck with your research. And post Dr. Raeders response.

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD, where is it?

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD

He posted his own moronic email.
I posted Dr. Raeder explaining why SSDD was wrong.

 

[jc456]

you think cold objects heat up warmer objects, I'd say you have the lead on stupid.

you think cold objects heat up warmer objects,

I do? Nah. You're lying.

nope, I am a very honest person. I admit my mistakes when I make one. So far I've been waiting for you to post the observation that proves me wrong. Until then it is what it is., you should learn how that's done.

nope, I am a very honest person.

Excellent. Then you can link to the post where I said, "cold objects heat up warmer objects".

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects? if so, there you go!!!

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects?

Only if they're above absolute zero. Because....Stefan-Boltzmann.

there you go, see you say cold objects radiate toward warmer objects, that says that heat should warm the warmer object.

 

[jc456]

no scientist on this planet knows what is happening on the sun, are you saying you know more than any other scientist? wow!!! so you should write that text book

no scientist on this planet knows what is happening on the sun,

Link?

Why is the sun's corona the hottest layer when it is farther from the sun's core than other layers are?

The corona is hotter than the surface?
That's weird, according to SSDD, that would prevent the surface from emitting.
Was he correct? Or does the surface emit?

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening and I will respond afterward.

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening

The Sun radiates through the hotter corona. Obviously.

Because......wait for it......Stefan-Boltzmann.

post that link that says that about the suns surface.

 

[jc456]

I'm letting everyone know that you have no observed evidence to support your dogma. Just so we're clear.

Right. Stefan-Boltzmann was derived with no observed evidence...…..durr

post it!!! the evidence.

View attachment 272929

Here's the important part......

The law was almost immediately experimentally verified.

Good luck with your research. And post Dr. Raeders response.

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD, where is it?

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD

He posted his own moronic email.
I posted Dr. Raeder explaing why SSDD was wrong.

nope, that wasn't what you said. so let's see his email that was directed to SSDD. otherwise you're a liar.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you think cold objects heat up warmer objects,

I do? Nah. You're lying.

nope, I am a very honest person. I admit my mistakes when I make one. So far I've been waiting for you to post the observation that proves me wrong. Until then it is what it is., you should learn how that's done.

nope, I am a very honest person.

Excellent. Then you can link to the post where I said, "cold objects heat up warmer objects".

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects? if so, there you go!!!

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects?

Only if they're above absolute zero. Because....Stefan-Boltzmann.

Yep I completely agree with that, except when surrounded by warmer objects. so the question was does the cold object still radiate around warmer objects? you ricocheted away from my question.

Yep I completely agree with that, except when surrounded by warmer objects.

I've said, you should definitely publish your proof that SB is wrong.

so the question was does the cold object still radiate around warmer objects?

Only if they're above absolute zero.

Do I need to explain what absolute zero means? Besides your IQ?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you think cold objects heat up warmer objects,

I do? Nah. You're lying.

nope, I am a very honest person. I admit my mistakes when I make one. So far I've been waiting for you to post the observation that proves me wrong. Until then it is what it is., you should learn how that's done.

nope, I am a very honest person.

Excellent. Then you can link to the post where I said, "cold objects heat up warmer objects".

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects? if so, there you go!!!

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects?

Only if they're above absolute zero. Because....Stefan-Boltzmann.

there you go, see you say cold objects radiate toward warmer objects, that says that heat should warm the warmer object.

that says that heat should warm the warmer object.

Why would fewer photons from the colder object outnumber the larger number of photons from the warmer object?

Is it because you failed math?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Right. Stefan-Boltzmann was derived with no observed evidence...…..durr

post it!!! the evidence.

View attachment 272929

Here's the important part......

The law was almost immediately experimentally verified.

Good luck with your research. And post Dr. Raeders response.

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD, where is it?

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD

He posted his own moronic email.
I posted Dr. Raeder explaing why SSDD was wrong.

nope, that wasn't what you said. so let's see his email that was directed to SSDD. otherwise you're a liar.

nope, that wasn't what you said.

Post what I said.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

no scientist on this planet knows what is happening on the sun,

Link?

Why is the sun's corona the hottest layer when it is farther from the sun's core than other layers are?

The corona is hotter than the surface?
That's weird, according to SSDD, that would prevent the surface from emitting.
Was he correct? Or does the surface emit?

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening and I will respond afterward.

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening

The Sun radiates through the hotter corona. Obviously.

Because......wait for it......Stefan-Boltzmann.

post that link that says that about the suns surface.

If you can see a photon from the Sun's surface, that's my proof.

 

[jc456]

nope, I am a very honest person. I admit my mistakes when I make one. So far I've been waiting for you to post the observation that proves me wrong. Until then it is what it is., you should learn how that's done.

nope, I am a very honest person.

Excellent. Then you can link to the post where I said, "cold objects heat up warmer objects".

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects? if so, there you go!!!

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects?

Only if they're above absolute zero. Because....Stefan-Boltzmann.

Yep I completely agree with that, except when surrounded by warmer objects. so the question was does the cold object still radiate around warmer objects? you ricocheted away from my question.

Yep I completely agree with that, except when surrounded by warmer objects.

I've said, you should definitely publish your proof that SB is wrong.

so the question was does the cold object still radiate around warmer objects?

Only if they're above absolute zero.

Do I need to explain what absolute zero means? Besides your IQ?

I've said, you should definitely publish your proof that SB is wrong.
Sure, once you show me the observation that created the report. I've been waiting a long time for you to post that evidence. hmmmmm seems strange, you sure like to use the name.

 

[jc456]

Why is the sun's corona the hottest layer when it is farther from the sun's core than other layers are?

The corona is hotter than the surface?
That's weird, according to SSDD, that would prevent the surface from emitting.
Was he correct? Or does the surface emit?

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening and I will respond afterward.

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening

The Sun radiates through the hotter corona. Obviously.

Because......wait for it......Stefan-Boltzmann.

post that link that says that about the suns surface.

If you can see a photon from the Sun's surface, that's my proof.

except you have no idea how it was created. so once you got that, comeback and we'll discuss further. until science knows, you've got nothing.

 

[jc456]

post it!!! the evidence.

View attachment 272929

Here's the important part......

The law was almost immediately experimentally verified.

Good luck with your research. And post Dr. Raeders response.

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD, where is it?

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD

He posted his own moronic email.
I posted Dr. Raeder explaing why SSDD was wrong.

nope, that wasn't what you said. so let's see his email that was directed to SSDD. otherwise you're a liar.

nope, that wasn't what you said.

Post what I said.

you post it, you're the one refuting my statement.
#478

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

nope, I am a very honest person.

Excellent. Then you can link to the post where I said, "cold objects heat up warmer objects".

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects? if so, there you go!!!

do you say that cold objects radiate when next to warmer objects?

Only if they're above absolute zero. Because....Stefan-Boltzmann.

Yep I completely agree with that, except when surrounded by warmer objects. so the question was does the cold object still radiate around warmer objects? you ricocheted away from my question.

Yep I completely agree with that, except when surrounded by warmer objects.

I've said, you should definitely publish your proof that SB is wrong.

so the question was does the cold object still radiate around warmer objects?

Only if they're above absolute zero.

Do I need to explain what absolute zero means? Besides your IQ?

I've said, you should definitely publish your proof that SB is wrong.
Sure, once you show me the observation that created the report. I've been waiting a long time for you to post that evidence. hmmmmm seems strange, you sure like to use the name.

Sure, once you show me the observation that created the report.

You don't know how SB was derived? Why am I not surprised?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The corona is hotter than the surface?
That's weird, according to SSDD, that would prevent the surface from emitting.
Was he correct? Or does the surface emit?

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening and I will respond afterward.

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening

The Sun radiates through the hotter corona. Obviously.

Because......wait for it......Stefan-Boltzmann.

post that link that says that about the suns surface.

If you can see a photon from the Sun's surface, that's my proof.

except you have no idea how it was created. so once you got that, comeback and we'll discuss further. until science knows, you've got nothing.

I know how photons from the Sun are created. Do you?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

View attachment 272929

Here's the important part......

The law was almost immediately experimentally verified.

Good luck with your research. And post Dr. Raeders response.

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD, where is it?

still waiting for that email you had from SSDD

He posted his own moronic email.
I posted Dr. Raeder explaing why SSDD was wrong.

nope, that wasn't what you said. so let's see his email that was directed to SSDD. otherwise you're a liar.

nope, that wasn't what you said.

Post what I said.

you post it, you're the one refuting my statement.
#478

It's true, he laughed at SSDD.
Because it was funny.
He posted Dr. Raeder as an expert backing up his claims.

Dr. Raeder disagreed with SSDD's silly claims.

 

[jc456]

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening and I will respond afterward.

let me know when the scientist understand what is happening

The Sun radiates through the hotter corona. Obviously.

Because......wait for it......Stefan-Boltzmann.

post that link that says that about the suns surface.

If you can see a photon from the Sun's surface, that's my proof.

except you have no idea how it was created. so once you got that, comeback and we'll discuss further. until science knows, you've got nothing.

I know how photons from the Sun are created. Do you?

How?