Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
in this economy??What "authority" works in this case? Bloomberg or Patterson or Public Opinion?
The LAW trumps your silly fucking guilt trip, fool.
enjoy knowing that as the building is built.
Guilt Trip? Yeah right, tell the Union Contractors when they don't move a muscle on this project that, you'll find out what a free mud hole stomping is, hell I'll pay to see that, let me know when you grow the balls for this.......
I don't know if she's right or wrong. But this appeal to "authority" argument doesn't work.
What "authority" works in this case? Bloomberg or Patterson or Public Opinion?
Public opinion isn't going to stop the building from being built. The fuckhead who is building it has rights the public can't take away from him.
in this economy??The LAW trumps your silly fucking guilt trip, fool.
enjoy knowing that as the building is built.
Guilt Trip? Yeah right, tell the Union Contractors when they don't move a muscle on this project that, you'll find out what a free mud hole stomping is, hell I'll pay to see that, let me know when you grow the balls for this.......
i think you'll find quite a few that would welcome the work
What "authority" works in this case? Bloomberg or Patterson or Public Opinion?
Public opinion isn't going to stop the building from being built. The fuckhead who is building it has rights the public can't take away from him.
He will need a lot of luck getting the unions to cooperate on this......
We do agree he is a fuck head.....
what will be more of a problem is, they only own HALF the property they are currently planing to build onin this economy??Guilt Trip? Yeah right, tell the Union Contractors when they don't move a muscle on this project that, you'll find out what a free mud hole stomping is, hell I'll pay to see that, let me know when you grow the balls for this.......
i think you'll find quite a few that would welcome the work
We will see......
Public opinion isn't going to stop the building from being built. The fuckhead who is building it has rights the public can't take away from him.
He will need a lot of luck getting the unions to cooperate on this......
We do agree he is a fuck head.....
I agree with Divey...there'll be no problem getting companies and unions to build this...they need the work...and most if not all of them are not crazy anti-religious xenophobes.
what will be more of a problem is, they only own HALF the property they are currently planing to build onin this economy??
i think you'll find quite a few that would welcome the work
We will see......
they will either have to change there plans for a smaller building, or they will have to work out a deal to BUY the part they dont own
ConEdwhat will be more of a problem is, they only own HALF the property they are currently planing to build onWe will see......
they will either have to change there plans for a smaller building, or they will have to work out a deal to BUY the part they dont own
I didn't know that, interesting, do you have a link?? Who owns the other half??
ConEdwhat will be more of a problem is, they only own HALF the property they are currently planing to build on
they will either have to change there plans for a smaller building, or they will have to work out a deal to BUY the part they dont own
I didn't know that, interesting, do you have a link?? Who owns the other half??
and its in at least one of the threads on this
exactlyConEdI didn't know that, interesting, do you have a link?? Who owns the other half??
and its in at least one of the threads on this
Very interesting, they have to go through a five member state committee to purchase headed by Gov. Patterson.....
El-Gamal believes he can build on this site because he owns a lease in the purchase of the half they do own, this sounds like it could be tied up in court for years......
It isn't bad manners, insensitivity or ulterior motives. It does show anti-muslim sentiment in this thread is extremely negative.being called either racist anti-gay or liberal progressivesWhere are all the proponents of religious freedom?
I haven't seen a soul denounce any religion here or suggest that any religion should be denied a place to exist.
Everybody here opposed to the Cordoba House does so on the grounds that it shows bad manners, insensitivity, and possible ulterior motives. Even the name of the place is suspect.
In the 8th Century, Islam invaded Spain and established a caliphate with Cordoba as is seat in what is now modern Spain. It was considered one of the inevitable steps in the goals of Islam to control the world. The great mosque at Cordoba was built on the foundation of a destroyed Christian cathedral. When the Muslims were eventually beaten back 500 years later, that mosque was destroyed. But it remains in Islamic history.
Is it pure coincidence that this mosque/community center will be dubbed Cordoba House?
provide proof they had nothing to do with it.
This is apparently untrue. There are taller buildings between 45 Park Place and Ground Zero...it will not be visible. Also, there has been a mosque in the area for forty years.Ok, so it's not ON the site.
You may be right about decency and respect. But in America, it's not the law that we have decency and respect. And what do you suggest they do to stop the building of the mosque, if not through legal means?
No it isn't right on the site, but it is on the site of a building that was damaged in 9/11 and had to be torn down which is why the lot is available. And it will be tall enough to be entirely visible from Ground Zero, and the broadcast calls to prayer will be heard at the designated intervals through the day for up to a mile in all directons.
