October Surprise!!

Will the MSM find out the truth about the Admiral and General relieved of duty?

  • Yes, the MSM will be all over it?

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, the MSM would rather talk about abortion.

    Votes: 10 100.0%

  • Total voters
    10
Condi Rice NEVER stated there was not real time video or info available. All she states about it is ""It is not very easy in circumstances like this to know precisely what's going on as it's unfolding," So stop with the spinning! No one claims it was not a difficult situation!


In the same link we also have this statement from one expert Scott Stewart who told US News & World Report that protecting diplomats and allowing them to do their work are not mutually exclusive.

"I don't think it's antithetical to diplomacy to have security," says Scott Stewart, a retired Diplomatic Security Special Agent involved in hundreds of terrorism investigations.

THE POINT is that you are dead wrong about there being "in real time" info coming out of Benghazi- there was!

There was no actionable info particularly since any help would have arrived long after the incident was over.

What the F are you talking about...They flipping KNEW the compound was under attack! They flipping had drones in the area! They flipping had teams on the ready to send in!

Are you actually reading the testimony and the information coming out? Or just to the spin being espoused in an attempt to obfuscate? (rhetorical question)

They knew something was going on, but all they could see was that buildings were burning and those teams were nowhere near enough to get there in time. Try again.
 
There was no actionable info particularly since any help would have arrived long after the incident was over.

What the F are you talking about...They flipping KNEW the compound was under attack! They flipping had drones in the area! They flipping had teams on the ready to send in!

Are you actually reading the testimony and the information coming out? Or just to the spin being espoused in an attempt to obfuscate? (rhetorical question)

They knew something was going on, but all they could see was that buildings were burning and those teams were nowhere near enough to get there in time. Try again.


You are making shit up! Those in power (the WH who communicated with the Pentagon) refused to do anything! A General was allegedly dismissed for his willingness to act after being told to stand down. They knew the embassy was under attack. They knew which terror group was taking credit within the first hour of the attack., They had drones overhead. There were other security personnel already in the area... READ THE FUCKING INTEL that is being provided in testimony...GAWD but you are acting pathetic!
 
There was no actionable info particularly since any help would have arrived long after the incident was over.

What the F are you talking about...They flipping KNEW the compound was under attack! They flipping had drones in the area! They flipping had teams on the ready to send in!

Are you actually reading the testimony and the information coming out? Or just to the spin being espoused in an attempt to obfuscate? (rhetorical question)

They knew something was going on, but all they could see was that buildings were burning and those teams were nowhere near enough to get there in time. Try again.

Who told you that? Is that the talking point argument you have been given?
How about this why was Ambassador Stevens inadequately protected even after he made request for more security?
 
What the F are you talking about...They flipping KNEW the compound was under attack! They flipping had drones in the area! They flipping had teams on the ready to send in!

Are you actually reading the testimony and the information coming out? Or just to the spin being espoused in an attempt to obfuscate? (rhetorical question)

He's a mind numbed drone who dutifully regurgitates what is fed to him by the Obama propaganda ministers.

Apparently so!
 

Forum List

Back
Top