Ocasio-Cortez gets new 2020 challenger: a Republican immigrant from Jamaica

It funny to hear pseudocons saying black people should vote for a black person just because she's black.

My, my, my! They just keep sounding more and more like the 60s hippies every day.
Democrats think all black people should vote Democrat. The biggest threat to a democrat is a conservative black American. I've seen Democrats actually go bonkers over it.
Yes and the biggest racists on the planet are black democrats. Then again, right behind them are white leftists. Both hate minority conservatives more than they even hate Trump.

Could you imagine, for example if Trump talked to any stupid ass minority democrat the way that stupid fake Cherokee (btw Cherokees fought for the confederacy and owned slaves) talked to BRAIN SURGEON Dr Ben Carson?

 
...the biggest racists on the planet are black democrats. Then again, right behind them are white leftists. Both hate minority conservatives more than they even hate Trump.
Hey, wait a minute! Are you NOW saying that being a racist is a BAD thing?

How weird!

But you're the same guy who said THIS:
When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

What the hell!

What the hell!

How weird!
.
 
...the biggest racists on the planet are black democrats. Then again, right behind them are white leftists. Both hate minority conservatives more than they even hate Trump.
Hey, wait a minute! Are you NOW saying that being a racist is a BAD thing?

How weird!

But you're the same guy who said THIS:
When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

What the hell!

What the hell!

How weird!
.
Yeah, you don't get what I am saying cause you are a moron.

If I am a racist for calling out pathetic blacks or other minorities for constantly using the fucking race card to either advance their position in life or to get FREE HANDOUTS or whatever, then fuck you. I am fucking racist.

Now, GO TAKE YOUR PATHETIC IDENTITY POLITICS AND YOUR SOCIALIST FANTASIES AND GO FUCK YOURSELF.

I have you so pegged you dumb ignorant hypocrite.
 
...the biggest racists on the planet are black democrats. Then again, right behind them are white leftists. Both hate minority conservatives more than they even hate Trump.
Hey, wait a minute! Are you NOW saying that being a racist is a BAD thing?

How weird!

But you're the same guy who said THIS:
When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

What the hell!

What the hell!

How weird!
.
Yeah, you don't get what I am saying cause you are a moron.

If I am a racist for calling out pathetic blacks or other minorities for constantly using the fucking race card to either advance their position in life or to get FREE HANDOUTS or whatever, then fuck you. I am fucking racist.

Now, GO TAKE YOUR PATHETIC IDENTITY POLITICS AND YOUR SOCIALIST FANTASIES AND GO FUCK YOURSELF.

I have you so pegged you dumb ignorant hypocrite.
Seriously, that's the best spin you have this morning?

I'm a little disappointed, but I appreciate the effort!
.
 
It funny to hear pseudocons saying black people should vote for a black person just because she's black.

My, my, my! They just keep sounding more and more like the 60s hippies every day.
Democrats think all black people should vote Democrat. The biggest threat to a democrat is a conservative black American. I've seen Democrats actually go bonkers over it.
Yes and the biggest racists on the planet are black democrats. Then again, right behind them are white leftists. Both hate minority conservatives more than they even hate Trump.

Could you imagine, for example if Trump talked to any stupid ass minority democrat the way that stupid fake Cherokee (btw Cherokees fought for the confederacy and owned slaves) talked to BRAIN SURGEON Dr Ben Carson?


She talked to him that way only because he’s black.
 
AOC to face Jamaican Immigrant for her seat

170719murray1.jpg


She’s not the only one running for the seat. John Cummings, a Bronx high school civics teacher is also in the race.


There will probably be more but, IMHO, Scherie Murray probably has the best chance. Not only is she a female but an immigrant with extensive business experience.


I think AOC is going to be dust after 2020.


More @ Prison Planet.com » Republican Immigrant From Jamaica to Challenge AOC For Congressional Seat
 
AOC to face Jamaican Immigrant for her seat

170719murray1.jpg


She’s not the only one running for the seat. John Cummings, a Bronx high school civics teacher is also in the race.


There will probably be more but, IMHO, Scherie Murray probably has the best chance. Not only is she a female but an immigrant with extensive business experience.


I think AOC is going to be dust after 2020.


More @ Prison Planet.com » Republican Immigrant From Jamaica to Challenge AOC For Congressional Seat

AOC will he toast but not at the hands of a Repub. she will not make it out of the primary and the Repub will get less than 20% of the vote in the general.
 
AOC to face Jamaican Immigrant for her seat

170719murray1.jpg


She’s not the only one running for the seat. John Cummings, a Bronx high school civics teacher is also in the race.


There will probably be more but, IMHO, Scherie Murray probably has the best chance. Not only is she a female but an immigrant with extensive business experience.


I think AOC is going to be dust after 2020.


More @ Prison Planet.com » Republican Immigrant From Jamaica to Challenge AOC For Congressional Seat
AOC’s job will be done next year. Getting Trump re-elected.
 
The 16th and 17th amendments are unconditional. The founders would have never approved of taxing what a person makes nor did they want the States to lose its voice in the election process. That one one of the biggest issues they had.

The Founders would never have approved of women or black people voting either.
red herring bitch
since you just proved you actually don't know anything about the founding of the country
You said
"Illogical. Something cannot be part of the constitution and unconstitutional at the same time. You can disagree and want them changed, but they are just as much a part of the Constitution as the 1st and 2nd"
The 16th and 17th both were passed without constitutional standing and were not add by the founders.
Do you even know what the 17th amendment is?
 
I believe the government is too big.

Me too


I believe most departments and Bureaus should be shut down.

Me too


I believe the 16th and 17th amendment is unconstitutional.

Illogical. Something cannot be part of the constitution and unconstitutional at the same time. You can disagree and want them changed, but they are just as much a part of the Constitution as the 1st and 2nd.

I believe shall not be infringed means exactly that.

Me too

I believe if a person went to prison and the government releases them they have paid their debt to Society all rights must be given back.

Me too

I believe welfare should only be given to those who really needed.

Me too

I believe problems should be handled by the only ones involved
Me too

I believe if you caused your mistake you fix it.

Me too

I believe leftist are the real threat to America.even bigger than any foreign country
So you were saying I was left of you? lol
.

I believe partisans are the real threat to America.even bigger than any foreign country. Does not matter if they are left wing or right wing.

And yet you were calling me a lefty...LOL

So, what is your take on anti-discrimination laws?
The 16th and 17th amendments are unconditional. The founders would have never approved of taxing what a person makes nor did they want the States to lose its voice in the election process. That one one of the biggest issues they had.
Which is why we can see how pathetic woodrow wilson was and when socialism began getting its tentacles on our government.
There is a movie that is pretty accurate a more perfect union
 
AOC will he toast but not at the hands of a Repub. she will not make it out of the primary and the Repub will get less than 20% of the vote in the general.

Indeed...a true testament to the stupidity of her district.
No wonder these people are and will remain so destitute......they can't think their way out of a wet tissue.

They've been voting the same way for what? 50 years? And look where it's got them.
The definition of insanity...doing the exact same thing and expecting different results.
Sounds like Socialists.
 
The 16th and 17th amendments are unconditional. The founders would have never approved of taxing what a person makes nor did they want the States to lose its voice in the election process. That one one of the biggest issues they had.

The Founders would never have approved of women or black people voting either.
red herring bitch
since you just proved you actually don't know anything about the founding of the country
You said
"Illogical. Something cannot be part of the constitution and unconstitutional at the same time. You can disagree and want them changed, but they are just as much a part of the Constitution as the 1st and 2nd"
The 16th and 17th both were passed without constitutional standing and were not add by the founders.
Do you even know what the 17th amendment is?

You are the one that brought up the founders, not me so do not whine about it.

Both the 16th and 17th were added to the Constitution in the manner put forth in the Constitution for making changes to it.

If you do not like them, work to remove or replace them.
 
The 16th and 17th amendments are unconditional. The founders would have never approved of taxing what a person makes nor did they want the States to lose its voice in the election process. That one one of the biggest issues they had.

The Founders would never have approved of women or black people voting either.
red herring bitch
since you just proved you actually don't know anything about the founding of the country
You said
"Illogical. Something cannot be part of the constitution and unconstitutional at the same time. You can disagree and want them changed, but they are just as much a part of the Constitution as the 1st and 2nd"
The 16th and 17th both were passed without constitutional standing and were not add by the founders.
Do you even know what the 17th amendment is?

You are the one that brought up the founders, not me so do not whine about it.

Both the 16th and 17th were added to the Constitution in the manner put forth in the Constitution for making changes to it.

If you do not like them, work to remove or replace them.
I suggest you do some research on the 16th and 17th amendment. And if the founders wanted people voting for the senate they would have done so,
 
The 16th and 17th amendments are unconditional. The founders would have never approved of taxing what a person makes nor did they want the States to lose its voice in the election process. That one one of the biggest issues they had.

The Founders would never have approved of women or black people voting either.
red herring bitch
since you just proved you actually don't know anything about the founding of the country
You said
"Illogical. Something cannot be part of the constitution and unconstitutional at the same time. You can disagree and want them changed, but they are just as much a part of the Constitution as the 1st and 2nd"
The 16th and 17th both were passed without constitutional standing and were not add by the founders.
Do you even know what the 17th amendment is?

You are the one that brought up the founders, not me so do not whine about it.

Both the 16th and 17th were added to the Constitution in the manner put forth in the Constitution for making changes to it.

If you do not like them, work to remove or replace them.
I suggest you do some research on the 16th and 17th amendment. And if the founders wanted people voting for the senate they would have done so,

And if the founders wanted black people or women voting they would have done so.

What the founders wanted is a stupid argument, the same one the anti-gun folks use.

I actually agree with you about the 17th, I prefer the old way. But the 17th is now part of the Constitution and we do not get to ignore it.
 
Does he know that Cincinnati is in the US?
AOC will lose in the primary and this chick will lose by 80 points in the general.

As long as the outcome is she is gone and someone who respects and values the American system gets in, I don't care how it happens

What American values does she reject? Piling on AOC as you do is nothing but going along with the mob, that is, character assassination.

She's assertive, opinionated and very well informed, something which offends and scares misogynists. I don't agree with all of her ideas on policy, but I admire her spunk and rejection of Trumpism.
 
Does he know that Cincinnati is in the US?
AOC will lose in the primary and this chick will lose by 80 points in the general.

As long as the outcome is she is gone and someone who respects and values the American system gets in, I don't care how it happens

What American values does she reject? Piling on AOC as you do is nothing but going along with the mob, that is, character assassination.

She's assertive, opinionated and very well informed, something which offends and scares misogynists. I don't agree with all of her ideas on policy, but I admire her spunk and rejection of Trumpism.
th
 
The 16th and 17th amendments are unconditional. The founders would have never approved of taxing what a person makes nor did they want the States to lose its voice in the election process. That one one of the biggest issues they had.

The Founders would never have approved of women or black people voting either.
red herring bitch
since you just proved you actually don't know anything about the founding of the country
You said
"Illogical. Something cannot be part of the constitution and unconstitutional at the same time. You can disagree and want them changed, but they are just as much a part of the Constitution as the 1st and 2nd"
The 16th and 17th both were passed without constitutional standing and were not add by the founders.
Do you even know what the 17th amendment is?

You are the one that brought up the founders, not me so do not whine about it.

Both the 16th and 17th were added to the Constitution in the manner put forth in the Constitution for making changes to it.

If you do not like them, work to remove or replace them.
There are alternative views to many things. The globalists needed to make inroads into the United States. And did with the Federal Reserve Act, the Federal Income Tax and the election of Federal Senators by the citizen. The fiat currency people even promised there would be no more recessions and depressions. The Senate picked by state legislatures and Money backed by gold and silver were hedges against foreign interference and a positive for the Republic. As voting rights were expanded in the years after we were set up to become a Democracy. This is not to argue voting. This is to argue voting for money. In the beginning any debt gave massive returns. Today it may be negative in many ways. Getting rid of the Electoral College will further eradicate what is left of the Republic that is near a full Democracy that has enacted laws of tyranny and will continue to do so as a new system replacing Democracy becomes the norm at some point. This is not whining. It is reality. And realizing what is being jettisoned. It is not easy to get these things. It is easy to throw them away.
 

Forum List

Back
Top