Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Got anything real or is this just another old man rant?
Got anything real or is this just another old man rant?
It's me murkin your common sense. Don't like it dont click my links.
Got anything real or is this just another old man rant?
It's me murkin your common sense. Don't like it dont click my links.
As soon as you actually provide a link for this particular rant, we will have that option...
It's me murkin your common sense. Don't like it dont click my links.
As soon as you actually provide a link for this particular rant, we will have that option...
Don't need a link to see that Obama will throw Arizona under the illegals busses to gain votes Many of which may also be illegal
As soon as you actually provide a link for this particular rant, we will have that option...
Don't need a link to see that Obama will throw Arizona under the illegals busses to gain votes Many of which may also be illegal
My bad...wasn't it you who just posted "Don't like it dont click my links"??
Moonglow has the perfect avi for his intelligence- This is not a joke and should be understood to have far reaching and unchallengeable consequences. If signed and ratified, these treaties would have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts.”
The first and most egregious is U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC). This tribunal that has jurisdiction across the globe could prosecute elected U.S. leaders for entering into a war without UN approval. These “crimes of aggression”—even if approved by Congress under an official declaration of war—could still land the president or cabinet members in prison. The ICC’s reach supersedes the rulings of any U.S. court, thereby posing a serious threat to constitutionally-guaranteed trials by a jury of our peers.
A lesser-known aspect of this treaty involves, ironically, the use of America’s military to wage aggressions against those deemed war criminals by the ICC.
The second is the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. This would ultimately give the decision making of what our children are taught to a global body. Even above that of the actual parents. "The Convention on the Rights of the Child is the first legally binding international instrument to incorporate the full range of human rights—civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights. In 1989, world leaders decided that children needed a special convention just for them because people under 18 years old often need special care and protection that adults do not. The leaders also wanted to make sure that the world recognized that children have human rights too. "
A third troublesome treaty is known as the Law of the Sea Treaty, or LOST. Over 162 nations have signed or ratified it. Many other nations, such as Turkey and Israel, have stayed out of it. Today, America is not on board, but this situation may change if Obama sidesteps the Constitution yet again via executive order.
Looks like Grampa murked you, Moonblow.Got anything real or is this just another old man rant?
It's me murkin your common sense. Don't like it dont click my threads.
Have you seen the treaty that gives up rights to our oil in our waters?
This man is a disgrace to our nation.
Have you seen the treaty that gives up rights to our oil in our waters?
This man is a disgrace to our nation.
That would be that Law of The Sea Treaty (LOST) I hyper-linked it. His global gun control treaty was presented to congress yesterday (I linked that one too)
Have you seen the treaty that gives up rights to our oil in our waters?
This man is a disgrace to our nation.
That would be that Law of The Sea Treaty (LOST) I hyper-linked it. His global gun control treaty was presented to congress yesterday (I linked that one too)
It's all treasonous in my opinion.
Moonglow has the perfect avi for his intelligence- This is not a joke and should be understood to have far reaching and unchallengeable consequences. If signed and ratified, these treaties would have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts.
The first and most egregious is U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC). This tribunal that has jurisdiction across the globe could prosecute elected U.S. leaders for entering into a war without UN approval. These crimes of aggressioneven if approved by Congress under an official declaration of warcould still land the president or cabinet members in prison. The ICCs reach supersedes the rulings of any U.S. court, thereby posing a serious threat to constitutionally-guaranteed trials by a jury of our peers.
A lesser-known aspect of this treaty involves, ironically, the use of Americas military to wage aggressions against those deemed war criminals by the ICC.
The second is the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. This would ultimately give the decision making of what our children are taught to a global body. Even above that of the actual parents. "The Convention on the Rights of the Child is the first legally binding international instrument to incorporate the full range of human rightscivil, cultural, economic, political and social rights. In 1989, world leaders decided that children needed a special convention just for them because people under 18 years old often need special care and protection that adults do not. The leaders also wanted to make sure that the world recognized that children have human rights too. "
A third troublesome treaty is known as the Law of the Sea Treaty, or LOST. Over 162 nations have signed or ratified it. Many other nations, such as Turkey and Israel, have stayed out of it. Today, America is not on board, but this situation may change if Obama sidesteps the Constitution yet again via executive order.
Here's another one from yesterday:
Obama Seeks US Congressional Ratification of UN Global Gun Control Treaty. Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State has announced that the Obama administration is working with the United Nations (UN) to approve, through the US Congress, the Small Arms Treaty (SAT).
Clinton affirmed that the US would facilitate talks with the UN in the Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, as long as it operates under the rules of consensus decision-making. Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly.
This global gun control scheme, concocted by the UN, is called the International Arms Control Treaty (IACT). Disguised as a way to combat terrorism, insurgents and international criminals, this document endeavors to secure the worlds citizens cannot defend themselves.
