Obama's Terror Ties

Where did I say it is foolish to have dialogue with an enemy? It's foolish to negotiate with criminals, and THAT is all terrorists and those who support them are.

Let's break down their real sophisticated MO: "Do exactly as we say and we'll stop."

That how YOU want to live? I got a finger on one hand and gun in the other for 'em.

How is Obama negotiating the criminals? I read the article and I must have missed that little snippet.
 
So the Soviet Union was not a terrorist state with criminals?

The best way to negate Hamas is to negotiate them into the world community and chip away their bang-bang approach until it is no longer in their best interest.

How many current countries started out as "terrorists?"
 
Yeah, right. Everybody can see how friendly they are with France, and how well integrated.
 
Where did I say it is foolish to have dialogue with an enemy? It's foolish to negotiate with criminals, and THAT is all terrorists and those who support them are.Let's break down their real sophisticated MO: "Do exactly as we say and we'll stop."


Making friends with terrorists IS condoning terrorist activities. Refusing to call terrorists terrorists IS condoning terrorist activities.
I mean, it couldn't be any plainer.


:eusa_hand: :rofl: :rofl:


"Qaddafi May Have Wanted Saudi Prince Killed

WASHINGTON — Intelligence chiefs for Libyan leader Col. Muammar al-Qaddafi (search) ordered a covert operation to assassinate the ruler of Saudi Arabia last year and throw the oil-rich kingdom into disarray, Fox News confirmed Thursday."

"Less than two weeks later on April 5, a bomb exploded in a West Berlin disco, La Belle, killing two American servicemen and a Turkish woman and wounding 200 others. The United States claimed to have obtained cable transcripts from Libyan agents in East Germany involved in the attack."

In Beirut, Lebanon, two British hostages held by the Abu Nidal Organization, Alec Collett and Leigh Douglas, along with an American named Philip Padfield were hanged in revenge. In addition, journalist John McCarthy was kidnapped and tourist Paul Appleby was murdered in Jerusalem.

Gaddafi quashed an internal revolt, the organization of which he blamed on the United States. Although Gaddafi appeared to have left the public sphere for a while in 1986/87, it later emerged that he had significantly increased Libyan arms shipments to terrorist groups in this period – especially to the Provisional IRA.

The Libyan government was alleged to have retaliated by ordering the hijacking of Pan Am Flight 73 in Pakistan on September 5, 1986. The allegation did not come to light until it was reported by The Sunday Times in March 2004--days after British prime minister, Tony Blair, paid the first official visit to Tripoli by a Western leader in a generation.[3]



:cool:


Secretary of State Condeleezza Rice announced that the U.S. was restoring full diplomatic relations with Libya and held up the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya as "a model" for others to follow.

:clap2: :clap2: :clap2:
 
let's get this straight for obama to negotiate with terrorist was what again?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
I did not say Obama was negotiating with criminals. He apparently has no problem with doing so. Terrorists are criminals, period.

And where has Obama negotiated or vowed to negotiate with terrorists or criminals?

You complain about how this MB isn't have any decent debates, but what do you really expect when people like SE are allowed to start threads like this without being banned at least temporarily? I only post on one other message board, and it's an NFL forum, and the discussion in football and politics are both very much more civil than this forum because if someone is caught blatantly lying then they will lose posting privileges for some period of time. This MB doesn't hold itself to a very high standard, so neither do the posters, myself included.
 
And where has Obama negotiated or vowed to negotiate with terrorists or criminals?

You complain about how this MB isn't have any decent debates, but what do you really expect when people like SE are allowed to start threads like this without being banned at least temporarily? I only post on one other message board, and it's an NFL forum, and the discussion in football and politics are both very much more civil than this forum because if someone is caught blatantly lying then they will lose posting privileges for some period of time. This MB doesn't hold itself to a very high standard, so neither do the posters, myself included.

Problem is, you're fishing. I made a general statement about negotiating with criminals. That is my opinion on the matter.

I didn't accuse Obama of negotiating with, or vowing to negotiate with criminals.

However, if you turn your attention to the initial post, second paragraph, he apparently has heartburn over some of it. Not specifically criminals, but people/governments the US will not negotiate with.

If you're going to accuse me of something, make sure I do it first.
 
I don't negotiate with message board terrorists. Sorry.

First of all sonny, nobody's "negotiating" with you.

Second, if you consider me a "terrorist" I suggest you go wet your pants elsewhere...

Come back when you can prove me wrong.
 
You are crazy dude. There are plenty of reasons for a conservative to vote against Obama. The influx of crazy anti-Obama threads just weakens the real arguments to vote against him.

The desperation of GOP supporters on this board is amazing. The more they find dirt to cover Obama, the more I am convinced I will vote for him over the old man.
 

Forum List

Back
Top