Obama's Socialism Exposed

[Vanquish]

Awwww. The obvious response to getting called out. I guess, PC, you thought you'd slide the twisty part past us at the beginning so the slight of hand wasn't discovered.

But yeah, definitions only work when the meaning is shared by everyone. Might want to bone up on your deconstructionism/Derrida. When you throw the word socialist out there...for the discussion to have any meaning...we have to be talking about the same socialism.

I'm sure if felt all warm and fuzzy to troll post with a title about socialism...and bigrebnc probably creamed his pants over it...but to anyone actually reading and internalizing, we had to call bullshit from the beginning.

ACORN controls the banking sector? BAHAHAHAHAHAABAHAHAHAABABAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA!
Socialism without goverment control? BAHAHAHAHAHAABAHAHAHAABABAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA!

*cough**choke**cough* oh wait, you're trying to be serious??

Your Obama Derangement Syndrome is showing. Might want to go get a shot.

1. You know, Vanquished, my fav part of debating with lefties is how you guys reveal your insecurities...
"...you thought you'd slide the twisty part past us ..."

C'mon, don't be afraid of standing up by yourself....if you have confidence in your opinion, than the 'us' stuff wouldn't be necessary.

That's why conservatives do so much better in debates, we're used to dealing with the liberal echo chamber that you grew up in.

2. Next, the "ACORN controls the banking sector? BAHAHAHAHAHAABAHAHAHAABABAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA!
Socialism without goverment control? BAHAHAHAHAHAABAHAHAHAABABAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA!"

Now, I'll evisorate your attack on the premise that ACORN was not a major factor in the mortgage meltdown:
a. In 1986, when the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (Acorn) threatened to oppose an acquisition by a southern bank, Louisiana Bancshares, until it agreed to new “flexible credit and underwriting standards” for minority borrowers—for example, counting public assistance and food stamps as income.

b. In 1987, Acorn led a coalition of advocacy groups calling for industry-wide changes in lending standards. Among the demanded reforms were the easing of minimum down-payment requirements and of the requirement that borrowers have enough cash at a closing to cover two to three months of mortgage payments (research had shown that lack of money in hand was a big reason some mortgages failed quickly).

c. ACORN then attacked Fannie Mae, the giant quasi-government agency that bought loans from banks in order to allow them to make new loans. Its underwriters were “strictly by-the-book interpreters” of lending standards and turned down purchases of unconventional loans, charged Acorn. The pressure eventually paid off. In 1992, Congress passed legislation requiring Fannie Mae and the similar Freddie Mac to devote 30 percent of their loan purchases to mortgages for low- and moderate-income borrowers.
Obsessive Housing Disorder by Steven Malanga, City Journal Spring 2009


Did that wipe the "BAHAHAHAHAHAABAHAHAHAABABAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA!"
off your keyboard?
I guess she who laughs last laughs best, huh?

3. "definitions only work when the meaning is shared by everyone."
Didn't you notice how the Egypt crisis has led to a new definition of 'democracy' vis-a-vis the Muslim Brotherhood?

Those not too bright are often stuck when conditions change...and I guess that indicates you, huh?

Oh, and the answer to the change in the definition of socialism is in the post just before yours.

Now, write soon, hear?

You've still proved absolutely nothing, PC. I'm going to have to raise my BAHAHAHAHAHAABAHAHAHAABABAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA! to a *chortle**snort*heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee* because it's absolutely redonkulous that you think Acorn controls the banking sector. An advocacy group calling reforms is far from "controlling the banking sector" - perhaps getting a few rules changed amounts to that in your eyes...but you'd be the only one. There are gigantic money interests at stake. A group like Acorn doesn't control such titans. You're retarded.

As for the socialism definition...you deflect that. Typical of you, really. The academic and political world has a REAL definition of socialism (including its hybrid forms)...but you make some troll post, twisting the definition and it means absolutely nothing the way you've twisted it.

Please, for god's sake, learn how to argue and learn to use accepted definitions.

 

[MaggieMae]

Wow!
All those scary words like:

"involvement", "radicalism", "nationalization", and OMG, "Socialism".
[Lions, Tigers and Bears, Oh my!]

Anyone ever thought about the fact that Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment Insurance, Veterans Benefits are one kind of "Socialism"?

Maybe we need to focus more on issues than words. You claim to have evidence of Obama's "Socialism", but overlook that fact that these govt institutions have been in place long before Obama came to the White House.

Stop watching FOX News and listen to responsible News broadcasts. You have OTHER news options!

Yeah, other news sources like the socialist news; nbc, cbs, abc, cnbc,msnbc, and cnn. You are right though socialism started in america long ago, and obama has been groomed by the socialists.

Proof?

 

[MaggieMae]

Damned Community Organizers!

Its all a plan for ACORN to establish a New World Order

Acorn is small potatoes

compared to the influence of the US Chamber of Commerce.

The chamber of commerce is about businesses, acorn is about socialism.

I have an idea: Why don't YOU move to some other country that doesn't have some form of "socialist" policies built into its capitalistic society. Oh wait, there are none. Guess you're stuck here.