Obama's Second Term

He has a good chance since illegals will be able to cast votes. Remember you don't need an ID to vote. Nothing wrong with that picture huh???

Do you have any evidence of ANY illegals voting?
That is the typical liberal reply to an objection to illegal voting. "Can you prove it is happening?"

Unless one could discover an illegal voter willing to swear that he/she voted illegally, the answer is no. If you consider that a precinct turned in more votes than the number of registered voters in the population of the precinct, then there's a fat chance that SOMEBODY VOTED ILLEGALLY. Either they weren't registered, they voted twice or they were not citizens. Either way, illegals voted. It was illegal for them vote.

So here is my question to you.

If ID cards were issued free of charge (as they should be to those that cannot afford them) then why do you object to such a proven way to exclude illegal votes from being cast?
 
He has a good chance since illegals will be able to cast votes. Remember you don't need an ID to vote. Nothing wrong with that picture huh???

Do you have any evidence of ANY illegals voting?

is this the same evidence of voter fraud? cause the libs told us that wasnt happening either.

Chicago politics is the epitome of fraudulent election machines. That is where Obama trained. That is where ACORN perfected its gaming plan. That is what one should expect of the resent administration....FRAUD.

Obama is a fraud himself.
 
What a slly Oreo!

Obama is no Carter and Romney is no Reagan. There is no 3rd Party to screw things up.

This election is going to be very, very close.



There isn't going to be a second term for Barack Obama--:eusa_whistle: Currently he has a 60+ % disapproval rating on the way he's handled the economy and the deficit. All the pretty--perfectly pronounced speech's aren't going to save him from Americans voting their wallets.
Poll: Obama disapproval rating on economy at record high - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

They always do.

Here is a University of Colorado study--already calling this election for Mitt Romney--and their analysis has been right since 1980.
CU-Boulder study predicts win for Mitt Romney in general election - Boulder Daily Camera

I imagine election night is going to look something similar to this.

images


Carter/Reagan election results--1980
 
Obama's Second Term

Thoughts?

October 22, 2012

Inve$tor$ Open To Higher Tax

"In recent weeks, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein and JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon became the latest Wall Street heavyweights to say they would be willing to pay more in exchange for a deal to balance the country's books.

Romney advocates cutting taxes by 20 percent and broadening the tax base by closing loopholes, though he's offered few details. The financial services industry had contributed some $16 million to Romney through October, compared with $4 million for Obama, according to the nonprofit Center for Responsive Politics.

Yet many who manage money for investors with at least $1 million in assets said in recent conversations they do not believe a modest rise in taxes on high-income earners would upend the economy, markets or individual portfolios.

"It only really impacts the higher income taxpayer," said Joseph Balestrino, who helps oversee $360 billion in assets at Federated Investment Management. "They won't like it, but they're not going to be worried about putting food on the table, and I don't think it will significantly alter their spending patterns."

Some said raising taxes might even be a much-needed first step toward deficit reduction. Congress has been too bitterly divided to compromise on a long-term fiscal repair plan.

"My belief is the positive benefits of dealing with the long-term deficit problem would well outweigh any negative consequences of higher taxes," said Jim McDonald, chief investment strategist at Northern Trust, which runs assets worth $704 billion."

:clap2:


gop-cry-baby.jpg
 

I think that Obama will be less effective in a second term because they all are.

No president has had a second term that was more fun than their first.

There is the advantage that they can take the heat for making unpopular decisions. Taxes WILL have to go up. The Bush tax giveaways will expire, and so will the Social Security deduction. There is no desire to extend either with 1 Trillion dollar deficits.

2014 will probably not be a good deal for him, as he will have a lot of Senate Seats up in the midterms. Probably the last gasp of the GOP before it fades into angry white guy irrelevency.
 
He has a good chance since illegals will be able to cast votes. Remember you don't need an ID to vote. Nothing wrong with that picture huh???

Do you have any evidence of ANY illegals voting?

There's no requirement that they backup what they post here. Iow, they can lie their asses off all day long.

Read the fucking thread, you stupid bitch! The evidence has been posted.

Gawd, you fucking liberals are DENSE!
 

I think that Obama will be less effective in a second term because they all are.
Whew!!

How old ARE you??!!!!


323.png
.
323.png
.
323.png
.
323.png
.
323.png


"Beach and Hodge turned the clock back to January 1993, before the new administration pushed the $241 billion tax hike through the 103rd Congress. Without getting into all of the mind-numbing technical details, they then ran the model on "fast-forward," asking it to tell them what the economy would look like today if tax and budget policy had not been changed in 1993.

What they found was not good news for the White House.

They found that another 1.2 million Americans would have jobs today if the economy hadn't been saddled with the tax increase. They learned that the U.S. auto industry would have built and sold an additional 1.1 million new cars and light trucks. And they learned that the typical U.S. wage-earner would have taken home an additional $2,600 in after-tax income.

The big numbers are equally disturbing. For example: The overall U.S. economy would have grown an additional $208 billion between 1993 and 1996. And business investment -- the key factor in creating jobs -- would have been $42.5 billion higher.

While there has been some quibbling about the exact details of the Beach/Hodge findings, the overall thrust of their work remains unchallenged: Tax hikes hurt, and the huge 1993 tax hike hurt big time."

520.gif



529.gif
.
529.gif
.
529.gif
.
529.gif
.
528.gif
 
I expect more of the same from the House and Senate. This time the mantra will be to do everything they can to unseat the Democrats in 2016 cause if we don't it's going to be a Socialist/Marxist Hellhole.......With a 60 vote hurdle to get anything done, I look for them to do the bare miminum.
 

Forum List

Back
Top