obama's record to run from

[Unkotare]

During the 2008 campaign, obama promised to end earmark abuse.

One of his first acts as President was to sign a spending bill that included over 8,500 earmarks.


Hmmm....

As a candidate for president, obama said lobbyists "will not work in my White House."

As soon as he moved in, he granted waivers for former lobbyists to work in 'his' White House.


Hmmmm......

During the 2010 midterm elections, obama called super-PACS "a threat to democracy." Now he is embracing them fully in his bid for re-election.


Hmmm............

 

[Unkotare]

.............................................

 

[Ed Spacer]

Hes a piece of shit liar hypocrite.
what else did you expect?
one point to add to your op.....
the mccain camp was DEMANDED not to bring up or criticize anything about obama.
this is what specilates some about rigging,etc..

 

[rdean]

Even if Obama was a bad president, which he isn't, he is a million light years better than any Republican. Turning the economy back over to them is like giving an arsonist a can of gasoline.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Obama isn't working

 

[Sunni Man]

We must follow and obey Obama.

He is our leader.

That is all.

 

[Truthmatters]

ABC's Gibson falsely claimed Obama "campaign[ed] on a promise to end pet projects" | Media Matters for America

never ever accept what a con says without checking the facts first

 

[hortysir]

ABC's Gibson falsely claimed Obama "campaign[ed] on a promise to end pet projects" | Media Matters for America

never ever accept what a con says without checking the facts first

After the Senate Appropriations panel approved two spending bills last week, Senate Appropriations Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) and Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) issued a press release celebrating a $250 million railway project for Honolulu, and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) praised $65 million in funding for the Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund, $15 million above President Barack Obama’s proposed budget.

(budget-smudget, I suppose)

Click Here for Entire Article

 

[Greenbeard]

If you're going to steal The Weekly Standard's stuff, it's polite to acknowledge the source material.

 

[hortysir]

If you're going to steal The Weekly Standard's stuff, it's polite to acknowledge the source material.

Missed the link?

 

[hortysir]

If you're going to steal The Weekly Standard's stuff, it's polite to acknowledge the source material.

*edit*
Not Weekly Standard, BTW.


But don't let that stop you from trying to discredit the source while you avoid the point.

 

[Peach]

If you're going to steal The Weekly Standard's stuff, it's polite to acknowledge the source material.

*edit*
Not Weekly Standard, BTW.


But don't let that stop you from trying to discredit the source while you avoid the point.

"Working AROUND the earmark ban" This is Obama's fault?

 

[hortysir]

If you're going to steal The Weekly Standard's stuff, it's polite to acknowledge the source material.

*edit*
Not Weekly Standard, BTW.


But don't let that stop you from trying to discredit the source while you avoid the point.

"Working AROUND the earmark ban" This is Obama's fault?

Whose pen is the last to touch any passed legislation?

 

[Greenbeard]

If you're going to steal The Weekly Standard's stuff, it's polite to acknowledge the source material.

*edit*
Not Weekly Standard, BTW.

Really? Not a Weekly Standard piece from Peter Wehner published just this week?

That can be done in a manner that is tough-minded but not mean-spirited​—​by referring to the public record of Obama’s counterfeit charges and broken promises, which are now sufficiently numerous that they could fill the Library of Congress. Among them:

n During the 2008 campaign, Obama promised to put an end to earmark abuse. Yet in one of his earliest acts as president, he signed an omnibus spending bill that contained more than 8,500 earmarks.

n Candidate Obama said lobbyists “will not work in my White House.” But upon taking office, he allowed waivers for former lobbyists working in his White House. [...]

n During the 2010 midterm elections, the president declared that super-PACs were a “threat to democracy.” He now embraces them. This flip-flop is similar to what Obama did during the 2008 campaign when he reversed his pledge to seek public financing in the general election.

 

[hortysir]

If you're going to steal The Weekly Standard's stuff, it's polite to acknowledge the source material.

*edit*
Not Weekly Standard, BTW.

Really? Not a Weekly Standard piece from Peter Wehner published just this week?

That can be done in a manner that is tough-minded but not mean-spirited​—​by referring to the public record of Obama’s counterfeit charges and broken promises, which are now sufficiently numerous that they could fill the Library of Congress. Among them:

n During the 2008 campaign, Obama promised to put an end to earmark abuse. Yet in one of his earliest acts as president, he signed an omnibus spending bill that contained more than 8,500 earmarks.

n Candidate Obama said lobbyists “will not work in my White House.” But upon taking office, he allowed waivers for former lobbyists working in his White House. [...]

n During the 2010 midterm elections, the president declared that super-PACs were a “threat to democracy.” He now embraces them. This flip-flop is similar to what Obama did during the 2008 campaign when he reversed his pledge to seek public financing in the general election.

I'll say, "My apologies".

But you didn't quote anyone so I thought you were referring to my post, which was directly above yours'.

 

[Truthmatters]

ABC's Gibson falsely claimed Obama "campaign[ed] on a promise to end pet projects" | Media Matters for America

never ever accept what a con says without checking the facts first

Obama never made the fucking promise you guys .

QUIT LYING

 

[hortysir]

ABC's Gibson falsely claimed Obama "campaign[ed] on a promise to end pet projects" | Media Matters for America

never ever accept what a con says without checking the facts first

Obama never made the fucking promise you guys .

QUIT LYING

Obama replied, "John, nobody is denying that $18 billion is important. And, absolutely, we need earmark reform . And when I'm president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...3/obamas-promise-go-after-earmarks-line-line/

 

[Neotrotsky]

Since Media Matters coordinates with the WH
they might not be a good source