Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
THe first question was what line would he be unwilling to cross to talk to Iran....
More mumbling and references to a "pathway" to Iran, and how important it is to respect their customs and their religion.
Well their customs include rigging elections, murderous coups and firing on their own people when they protest. Yay for the customs of Iran.
Obama's a piece of shit. I'd hoped he'd pull through, but he's not going to, all he's doing is making us the laughing stock of the world, and screwing over people who should be able to count on our support.
You're going to have a miserable 8 years...
Educate yourself on OUR customs towards countries whose resources we covet, like Iran...can you say ignore their customs and religion, threaten, subversion and murder?
No he won't. That's a ridiculous belief. Dems control the House and Senate, there will never be an impeachment of this Messiah.8 years my ass. Obama will end up impeached.
No he won't. That's a ridiculous belief. Dems control the House and Senate, there will never be an impeachment of this Messiah.8 years my ass. Obama will end up impeached.
BUT....
I would not be at all surprised if he makes history once again, and becomes the first sitting President to NOT win his party's nomination for re-election!Look for Hillary, whose been strangely silent on all matters of State for quite some time -- including on this Iran situation -- to be resigning in the near future, and marshaling her Hildebeasts and PUMA forces, and coming after The Obama.
He might not even be on the Dem ticket for 2012, but he won't be impeached.
The masses of the Democrat Party are the centrists and the moderates. The far-left loons are the vast minority. I can easily see a Hillary run for 2012 and I can see her wiping out Obama at this point.No he won't. That's a ridiculous belief. Dems control the House and Senate, there will never be an impeachment of this Messiah.8 years my ass. Obama will end up impeached.
BUT....
I would not be at all surprised if he makes history once again, and becomes the first sitting President to NOT win his party's nomination for re-election!Look for Hillary, whose been strangely silent on all matters of State for quite some time -- including on this Iran situation -- to be resigning in the near future, and marshaling her Hildebeasts and PUMA forces, and coming after The Obama.
He might not even be on the Dem ticket for 2012, but he won't be impeached.
Really!
That would take a major party uprising.
While that might be fun to watch, I don't see it as likely.
That would mean a majority of Democrats would be willing to openly oppose the "Black Guy", and that goes against every political motive they have utilized for the last 40 years...
I disagree. He sounded the same with or without a teleprompter, in either case he never explained what he hoped to accomplish. Obama is better at that, even though he lies. Bush didn't lie, he just failed to tell the American people what he hoped to accomplish.
Bush was nothing BUT a liar...even his first Treasury Secretary concurs...
"During the campaign, candidate Bush had criticized the Clinton-Gore Administration for being too interventionist: "If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road. And I'm going to prevent that."
"The thing that's most surprising, I think, is how emphatically, from the very first, the administration had said 'X' during the campaign, but from the first day was often doing 'Y,' Not just saying 'Y,' but actively moving toward the opposite of what they had said during the election."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml
You sir are a piece of work:
Your link: Jan. 11, 2004
Linking back to the Rather problem:
A year ago, Paul O'Neill was fired from his job as George Bush's Treasury Secretary for disagreeing too many times with the president's policy on tax cuts....
Bush was nothing BUT a liar...even his first Treasury Secretary concurs...
"During the campaign, candidate Bush had criticized the Clinton-Gore Administration for being too interventionist: "If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road. And I'm going to prevent that."
"The thing that's most surprising, I think, is how emphatically, from the very first, the administration had said 'X' during the campaign, but from the first day was often doing 'Y,' Not just saying 'Y,' but actively moving toward the opposite of what they had said during the election."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml
You sir are a piece of work:
Your link: Jan. 11, 2004
Linking back to the Rather problem:
A year ago, Paul O'Neill was fired from his job as George Bush's Treasury Secretary for disagreeing too many times with the president's policy on tax cuts....
The RATHER problem...did Dan Rather tell Paul O'Neill what to say or force him to speak?
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=592691n
Bush was nothing BUT a liar...even his first Treasury Secretary concurs...
"During the campaign, candidate Bush had criticized the Clinton-Gore Administration for being too interventionist: "If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road. And I'm going to prevent that."
"The thing that's most surprising, I think, is how emphatically, from the very first, the administration had said 'X' during the campaign, but from the first day was often doing 'Y,' Not just saying 'Y,' but actively moving toward the opposite of what they had said during the election."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml
No he won't. That's a ridiculous belief. Dems control the House and Senate, there will never be an impeachment of this Messiah.8 years my ass. Obama will end up impeached.
BUT....
I would not be at all surprised if he makes history once again, and becomes the first sitting President to NOT win his party's nomination for re-election!
Look for Hillary, whose been strangely silent on all matters of State for quite some time -- including on this Iran situation -- to be resigning in the near future, and marshaling her Hildebeasts and PUMA forces, and coming after The Obama.
He might not even be on the Dem ticket for 2012, but he won't be impeached.
No he won't. That's a ridiculous belief. Dems control the House and Senate, there will never be an impeachment of this Messiah.8 years my ass. Obama will end up impeached.
BUT....
I would not be at all surprised if he makes history once again, and becomes the first sitting President to NOT win his party's nomination for re-election!
<SNIP>
He might not even be on the Dem ticket for 2012, but he won't be impeached.
Don't see a revolution among the democrats as likely. As feckless as Carter was, he still had huge amounts of party support in 1980. And the revolution was from left, as Kennedy thought Carter hadn't gone far enough. There is no one who could fill that role now.
As for Clinton. She has become an unperson. I haven't heard anything out of her since March. A good question is, with the biggest foreign policy issue of the administration boiling all over, where has she been?
Also amazing is her total silence on Health Care. 0bama managed in three months what Bill couldn't do in 30 years. Shut her up.
No he won't. That's a ridiculous belief. Dems control the House and Senate, there will never be an impeachment of this Messiah.8 years my ass. Obama will end up impeached.
BUT....
I would not be at all surprised if he makes history once again, and becomes the first sitting President to NOT win his party's nomination for re-election!
<SNIP>
He might not even be on the Dem ticket for 2012, but he won't be impeached.
He is a two year president/He knows that's likely and it's why he has to try to get it done within less than that amount of time.
.
So's this by Milton Friedman:
"The heart of the liberal philosophy
is a belief in the dignity of the individual,
in his freedom to make the most of his capacities
and opportunities according to his own lights...
This implies a belief in the equality of man in one sense;
in their inequality in another."
That is real liberalism.
The masses of the Democrat Party are the centrists and the moderates. The far-left loons are the vast minority. I can easily see a Hillary run for 2012 and I can see her wiping out Obama at this point.No he won't. That's a ridiculous belief. Dems control the House and Senate, there will never be an impeachment of this Messiah.
BUT....
I would not be at all surprised if he makes history once again, and becomes the first sitting President to NOT win his party's nomination for re-election!Look for Hillary, whose been strangely silent on all matters of State for quite some time -- including on this Iran situation -- to be resigning in the near future, and marshaling her Hildebeasts and PUMA forces, and coming after The Obama.
He might not even be on the Dem ticket for 2012, but he won't be impeached.
Really!
That would take a major party uprising.
While that might be fun to watch, I don't see it as likely.
That would mean a majority of Democrats would be willing to openly oppose the "Black Guy", and that goes against every political motive they have utilized for the last 40 years...
There's ALOT of buyer's remorse out there in the Dem party, among it's actual people.
There was no viable Dem candidate to replace Carter. Unlike now.Don't see a revolution among the democrats as likely. As feckless as Carter was, he still had huge amounts of party support in 1980.
Sharpening her swords.As for Clinton. She has become an unperson. I haven't heard anything out of her since March. A good question is, with the biggest foreign policy issue of the administration boiling all over, where has she been?
Thank you for the mindless, standard, DU/HuffPuff parroting and regurgitation. However, you're about three months behind on your talking points. You better go refresh, get yourself a fresh drink of kool-aid.Egads the whiners brigade is still active after their loss but still offering nothing but whines. Do you people ever change? You lost, stop the darn crying, you offer nothing to replace what Obama is working on and your last foray into governance was a total ship wreck. Give it up crybabies.
Obama administration is faith-based? This from a party that is run by right wingnut christians.Thank you for the mindless, standard, DU/HuffPuff parroting and regurgitation. However, you're about three months behind on your talking points. You better go refresh, get yourself a fresh drink of kool-aid.Egads the whiners brigade is still active after their loss but still offering nothing but whines. Do you people ever change? You lost, stop the darn crying, you offer nothing to replace what Obama is working on and your last foray into governance was a total ship wreck. Give it up crybabies.
There was no viable Dem candidate to replace Carter. Unlike now.Don't see a revolution among the democrats as likely. As feckless as Carter was, he still had huge amounts of party support in 1980.Sharpening her swords.As for Clinton. She has become an unperson. I haven't heard anything out of her since March. A good question is, with the biggest foreign policy issue of the administration boiling all over, where has she been?
Thank you for the mindless, standard, DU/HuffPuff parroting and regurgitation. However, you're about three months behind on your talking points. You better go refresh, get yourself a fresh drink of kool-aid.Egads the whiners brigade is still active after their loss but still offering nothing but whines. Do you people ever change? You lost, stop the darn crying, you offer nothing to replace what Obama is working on and your last foray into governance was a total ship wreck. Give it up crybabies.
