Obama's October Surprise-Hurt Locker

So it appears Sony is set to release a movie about the Bin Laden take down on October 12, note the timing.

Do you think this will help Obama?? I'm thinking the world already hates us so what has he got to lose. Well unless you're not done bragging about killing someone.

Sony Seals October 12, 2012 Release Date For Kathryn Bigelow's Bin Laden/SEAL Team Thriller - Deadline.com

Actually, the release date was changed since your July 28, 2011 story.

Bigelow’s Osama bin Laden thriller is currently scheduled to hit U.S. theaters on December 19th, 2012. We will let you know if that changes.

Kyle Chandler Joins Kathryn Bigelow’s Bin Laden Thriller | Screen Rant
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJmFkbBjbO0]George W. Bush: "I Truly Am Not That Concerned About Osama Bin Laden" - YouTube[/ame]

Why wouldn't it help Obama? Why shouldn't it help Obama?

Simple facts:

Nine-Eleven on Bush's watch; OBL shot dead on Obama's watch.

Spin those facts; I'm sure the Ministry of Truth has talking points avalable to assist you.
 
So it appears Sony is set to release a movie about the Bin Laden take down on October 12, note the timing.

Do you think this will help Obama?? I'm thinking the world already hates us so what has he got to lose. Well unless you're not done bragging about killing someone.

Sony Seals October 12, 2012 Release Date For Kathryn Bigelow's Bin Laden/SEAL Team Thriller - Deadline.com

Actually, the release date was changed since your July 28, 2011 story.

Bigelow’s Osama bin Laden thriller is currently scheduled to hit U.S. theaters on December 19th, 2012. We will let you know if that changes.

Kyle Chandler Joins Kathryn Bigelow’s Bin Laden Thriller | Screen Rant

Wow, I didn't know that. Thanks. Perhaps when he celebrated the one year death and got a negative reaction he didn't think this was going to help him much.

Accept my apologies for posting bad info. It happens. :redface:
 
Ex-Seal team member says Obama misusin' Special Operations...
:eusa_eh:
SEAL Team 6 vet: What price Obama policies?
27 July`12 - 'We have a commander-in-chief to takes credit for heroic actions of others for political gain'
A former SEAL Team 6 member is speaking out about the national security consequences of having Barack Obama as a commander-in-chief. Montana State Sen. Ryan Zinke has launched Special Operations for America, a Super PAC that lists its mission as being committed to a strong and independent military, American exceptionalism and identifying and providing accurate information on policies that harm or discredit national security and members of the military.

Zinke spent 23 years in the Navy as a SEAL, going back to the Reagan administration. During his career he led counter-insurgency and contingency operations in the Persian Gulf and the Pacific theater of operations. He also was a SEAL commander is support of Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo. During Operation Iraqi Freedom, he was responsible for killing or capturing 72 known enemy insurgents. In 2006, he was awarded two bronze stars for combat.

Appearing on Sean Hannity’s show on Fox News, Zinke said he was not forming SOFA for personal gain, noting that he would not be taking any type of salary from the organization. “I’m not taking a paycheck, I’m doing this for God and country.” Zinke also has made it a point to emphasize that his issues with the president are not personal, but rather over national security concerns. “We’re going to be very careful in our delivery of message, we want to make sure that everything we say is well-documented … I don’t dislike the president personally, I dislike his policies as commander in chief.”

He said that among his concerns are national security leaks that some have said have come from the White House. He also takes issue with the president making the death of Osama bin Laden into a campaign issue. Appearing on Bryan Williams’ show after the raid, Obama said, “we thought about the fact that if there was a failure here, it would have disastrous consequences for me politically.”

MORE

See also:

Special Operations forces risk being overused, misused, former chief says
July 27th, 2012 : The use of military Special Operations Forces has been a proven success in Iraq, Afghanistan and - with last year's raid on Osama bin Laden's compound - in Pakistan, but that success has some people concerned. Will the forces become the tool of choice for a president?
The former head of the U.S. Special Operations Command told the Aspen Security Forum Thursday he fears there could be a misuse of the highly trained specialists. "It's a real danger," retired Adm. Eric Olson said. "They come to be thought of as a utility infielder, sometimes a utility infielder with guns, and they may be asked to solve problems that are not necessarily special operations problems." Olson cited cases of Special Operations Forces being asked to provide security for individuals overseas. The high demand has strained the elite forces. Last year, Olson warned the units were "beginning to show some fraying around the edges."

With the opposition gaining some ground in Syria in its battle to overthrow the Assad regime, some members of Congress are pressing the Obama administration to do more to help the insurgents, who are still not united or well-organized. In a quick interview with CNN's Security Clearance on the sidelines of the security forum, Michael Sheehan, the assistant secretary of defense for special operations, said the potential use of Special Operations Forces in Syria is not a focus of his right now. Sheehan also said there are no U.S. Special Operations Forces in Mali, where internal strife has left the northern part of the country ungoverned and where al Qaeda sympathizers have moved in, a development Sheehan called very troubling. He said the United States is considering options, but no decisions have been made.

Special Operations Forces are at work around the world, Olson's successor, Adm. William McRaven, told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Wednesday. McRaven said Special Operations Forces are in 79 countries, with the largest contingent in Afghanistan. Sixty-six thousand people are part of Special Operations Command, half of them active forces. Approximately 10,000 to 12,000 are deployed at any given time, with 7,000 currently in Afghanistan and more than 3,000 elsewhere, he said. Sheehan said the forces can operate anywhere and the numbers can range from just one or two in a country to dozens or several hundreds. The goal is to help the host nations handle their own security operations.

Source
 
George W. Bush: "I Truly Am Not That Concerned About Osama Bin Laden" - YouTube

Why wouldn't it help Obama? Why shouldn't it help Obama?

Simple facts:

Nine-Eleven on Bush's watch; OBL shot dead on Obama's watch.

Spin those facts; I'm sure the Ministry of Truth has talking points avalable to assist you.

Al Qaeda is bigger than OBL. Bush knew that. Killing OBL was a milestone, but, what are Obama's next steps to stomp out Al Qaeda? What is Obama doing to take his killing of OBL to the next level and prevent another 9-11 ???
 
Obama needs to fake a terrorist attack or an assassination attempt (that can be blamed on the Tea Party, of course)
 

Forum List

Back
Top