Obama's Nuclear Policy: The World Reacts

Russia is more interested in reassembling the Soviet Union than getting involved in the Middle East.
 

A smart play by Obama that will hopefully allow us to work with Russia to start squeezing Iran. You would think that it would go without saying that we wouldn't use Nukes at first provocation. However, after eight years of the Cowboy In Chief, it now has to be an official statement.

The protests by the Cons are utterly lame on this. I was listening to our local conservative talker, a classic Bush apologist, do her best to whine about this. Of course, she is a dim bulb so it came out as mush.

Of course, after eight years of a dismal national security record, you'd expect the party of "national security" to grasp at straws.

I agree the end game in all of this was to get this treaty resolved with Russia so that they can start to get involved in ensuring a nuclear free Iran. Looks like behind the scenes negotiations with both China and Russia are underway.

Of course, the right will claim that negotiating is for pussies and point to how effective the Bush "AXIS od EVIL" threats were in preventing Iran from seeking nuclear weapons
 
Not only is this a similar plan to Reagan's START initiative, but it is almost exactly the same, just an extension really.

So much so that people are now referring to Reagan's treaty as START I and to this treaty as START II.

It amazes me that right-wingers don't seem to realize when they're spitting on the legacy of a man they claim to be their hero.
 
Additions in bold:

1) Rush Limbaugh
2) Glenn Beck
3) Sarah Palin
4) Republicans
5) Global Warming
6) Tea Party
7) Corporations
8) Capitalists
9) Christians
10) Jews
 

A smart play by Obama that will hopefully allow us to work with Russia to start squeezing Iran. You would think that it would go without saying that we wouldn't use Nukes at first provocation. However, after eight years of the Cowboy In Chief, it now has to be an official statement.

The protests by the Cons are utterly lame on this. I was listening to our local conservative talker, a classic Bush apologist, do her best to whine about this. Of course, she is a dim bulb so it came out as mush.

Of course, after eight years of a dismal national security record, you'd expect the party of "national security" to grasp at straws.

I agree the end game in all of this was to get this treaty resolved with Russia so that they can start to get involved in ensuring a nuclear free Iran. Looks like behind the scenes negotiations with both China and Russia are underway.

Of course, the right will claim that negotiating is for pussies and point to how effective the Bush "AXIS od EVIL" threats were in preventing Iran from seeking nuclear weapons

It's rather pathetic to watch the right scramble on this. I think it was a smart move (and basically redundant).

We don't need to tell Russia and China that we aren't going to first strike them anymore than they need to tell us they aren't going to hit us with biochemical weapons. It's all just icing to open up some dialogue.
 
You can hear the laughter from Iran, Russia and China as the Rube in Chief dismantles our defenses
I beleive that the sound you are hearing is the production of WMD going into high gear from places like China, Russia, Phrance, India, Pokestan, Iran, and of course, Korea.

Everyone is rubbing their hands together.

At last, the Americans elected a fucking idiot and we can now draw close to even with them.

Paranoid whackjob....:cuckoo:
You really aren't very bright are you?

Or do you really think that the world reacting with happiness that we are disarming ourselves is because they think the world will now be a safer place?
 
I beleive that the sound you are hearing is the production of WMD going into high gear from places like China, Russia, Phrance, India, Pokestan, Iran, and of course, Korea.

Everyone is rubbing their hands together.

At last, the Americans elected a fucking idiot and we can now draw close to even with them.

Paranoid whackjob....:cuckoo:
You really aren't very bright are you?

Or do you really think that the world reacting with happiness that we are disarming ourselves is because they think the world will now be a safer place?

Why was it different when Reagan did it?
 
i love how people act like he getting rid of all nukes.. not the case.. and you know that the army is still going to make them just as much.. just a lot more quiter... plus do you believe russia gonig to lower its demand cause we both sign a treaty?

you all getting fooled...
 
You know.......this whole thing was started by the greatest hero of the GOP........

Ronald Reagan.

Now, my question is, when their greatest hero did it, it was a wise decision for the whole world, you know.....reducing nukes.

When Obama does it, you scream about losing our security. Hypocrite much y'all?
 
You know.......this whole thing was started by the greatest hero of the GOP........

Ronald Reagan.

Now, my question is, when their greatest hero did it, it was a wise decision for the whole world, you know.....reducing nukes.

When Obama does it, you scream about losing our security. Hypocrite much y'all?

Hmmm.. Let's see... Reagan was a man of strong moral fiber; whose character stood on the bed rock of sound principle; who recognized, respected, and understood to his core the immutable principles of nature on which America was founded...

The Brown Clown on the otherhand was raised by Marxists, mentored by a communist; professed that when he entered college he sought out the anti-American radicals, the would-be disenfranchised minorities, the Marxist professors and from there he spent his adult working lifetime advocating the dismantling of the US Constitutional protections which secure the rights of the individual from usurpation by government power; associating with former home grown anti-American communists who actively engaged in acts of terrorism, by bombing the US Pentagon and NYC Police Precincts... and once elected to the Presidency, went to work appointing Marxist, Communists, Maoist and other assorted Anti-American subversives throughout his administration.

Most recently conspiring with the Legislative majority to illicitly influence and threaten through his executive powers, to impart upon the US citizenry a law which is wholly in-Constitutional; having been passed by fraudulent means.


Need anything more than that?
 
Paranoid whackjob....:cuckoo:
You really aren't very bright are you?

Or do you really think that the world reacting with happiness that we are disarming ourselves is because they think the world will now be a safer place?

Why was it different when Reagan did it?

Hmm... Let's see... What is the difference between what Reagan did and what the BOY King's done?

Maybe it's in the negotiation...

Now you seem to know a lot about the two circumstances...

Why don't you inform the board of what Hussein offered and what he got in return... and compare and contrast what Reagan offered and what HE got in return...

Perhaps we'll find what we're looking for in your response... My guess is we will.
 
You know.......this whole thing was started by the greatest hero of the GOP........

Ronald Reagan.

Now, my question is, when their greatest hero did it, it was a wise decision for the whole world, you know.....reducing nukes.

When Obama does it, you scream about losing our security. Hypocrite much y'all?

Hmmm.. Let's see... Reagan was a man of strong moral fiber; whose character stood on the bed rock of sound principle; who recognized, respected, and understood to his core the immutable principles of nature on which America was founded...

The Brown Clown on the otherhand was raised by Marxists, mentored by a communist; professed that when he entered college he sought out the anti-American radicals, the would-be disenfranchised minorities, the Marxist professors and from there he spent his adult working lifetime advocating the dismantling of the US Constitutional protections which secure the rights of the individual from usurpation by government power; associating with former home grown anti-American communists who actively engaged in acts of terrorism, by bombing the US Pentagon and NYC Police Precincts... and once elected to the Presidency, went to work appointing Marxist, Communists, Maoist and other assorted Anti-American subversives throughout his administration.

Most recently conspiring with the Legislative majority to illicitly influence and threaten through his executive powers, to impart upon the US citizenry a law which is wholly in-Constitutional; having been passed by fraudulent means.


Need anything more than that?

Hey Pubeless Infant, you really are a first water retard ain't you?

That Alzheimer's addled idiot whose wife used a Ouija board and mediums to contact the spirit word, well he was just a fucking actor.

Remember his 500 ship Navy? Did more to fuck things up than anything, because we lowered our standards WAY down for enlistment standards.

Then, consider that afterwards, we ended up with too many ships and not enough sailors. I saw ships that had to deploy at only 85 percent manning, which sucks for the crew.

About the only thing Reagan did right was the SALT treaty.
 
YEah, we get it, in the wingnuts world, class is being violent and killing many people.
I'd argue that nuclear weapons have prevented more killing than any other single factor during the 20th century. They are the reason World War II was the last world war.

Good point. And he's not getting rid of them completely, so the deterrent is still there.

But, he's also not planning to maintain the ones we keep. So, what good is a nuke if it's left to deteriate? No new technology...no maintenance...just stick 'em in a bunker and hope and pray we never need them.

I wonder if the RODS FROM GOD will ever be developed to replace our nuclear power?
 
Obama's appeasement mentality is exactly opposite what a great leader should possess. Look what Reagan did by standing up to Russia. Heck, (and I am no fan of JFK) look what Kennedy did with the USSR and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Obama is weak and the rest of the world is laughing...and waiting for America to completely crumble.

Obama's policies will lead the US to destruction.

Obama alienates our allies, but kisses our enemies' a$$es.
 
Last edited:
Paranoid whackjob....:cuckoo:
You really aren't very bright are you?

Or do you really think that the world reacting with happiness that we are disarming ourselves is because they think the world will now be a safer place?

Why was it different when Reagan did it?

Two reasons. Reagan didn't and Reagan didn't do it right.

First you have to achieve parity. That means you drop the whole notion that because Russia is one country they should be entitled to have enough missiles to balance all of the west.

Russia gets the exact same number of nukes as the US. Nothing happens until that goal is reached first.

Then you reduce the number of nukes to the minimum needed to maintain the MAD model.

Then you go out together and work very hard to keep radical regimes like Iran from getting a working nuke of their own.

No other treaty makes any sense at all. It has to benefit the United States or all bets are off.
 
Obama's appeasement mentality is exactly opposite what a great leader should possess. Look what Reagan did by standing up to Russia. Heck, (and I am no fan of JFK) look what Kennedy did with the USSR and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Obama is weak and the rest of the world is laughing...and waiting for America to completely crumble.

Obama's policies will lead the US to destruction.

Obama alienates our allies, but kisses our enemies' a$$es.

Indeed. Just another avenue that documents Obama selling out this Republic. Another stepping stone to it's destruction, and lowering us to the level of the inaffecual EU, and other Socialist regimes.
 
Obama's appeasement mentality is exactly opposite what a great leader should possess. Look what Reagan did by standing up to Russia. Heck, (and I am no fan of JFK) look what Kennedy did with the USSR and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Obama is weak and the rest of the world is laughing...and waiting for America to completely crumble.

Obama's policies will lead the US to destruction.

Obama alienates our allies, but kisses our enemies' a$$es.

What about Bush Jr.'s appeasement mentality to corporations and his selling us out to China?

What about the Bush Doctrine that almost brought this country down?

What about Bush Jr. holding hands with a Saudi prince and STILL getting a fucked up deal for oil?
 

Forum List

Back
Top