Obama's job growth were part-time jobs...partially due to Obamacare!

[Faun]

Yep. The question is why. He wasn't running for office or was he?

He was being groomed for the future, the use of signs that way get people to thinking about him in the correct manner. He just arrived earlier than most thought he would.

Not me. He was perfect for their plan. Young, charismatic, family man and the most important part black. The poll at the church at the corner opens at six. My house is about a football field and a half from there. At 5:45 people were parking in front of my house because there was no place else to park. All black. I had to stand in line for a hour ans a half to vote. Normally takes 5 minutes. A blind man could see that coming.

So, now you are saying you saw it coming during the voting, before it you saw it coming when Obama was polling 30 points below Hillary.

You need to work on keeping your story straight.

Hillary was a lousy candidate. No I'm saying I knew that if he announced he would get almost 100% of the black vote. That alone would let him win. He announced and we, along with a lot of others, began cutting the deadwood(higher unemployment), stopped investing in new equipment(economy slows down), and waited it out(stagnate economy). You have to remember the Congress was run by democrats from January 2007 to January 2011. It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit. Obama and the democrats screwed up by wasting so much time on Obamacare. They should have steamrolled their socialist agenda through first and then did Obamacare.

"It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit."

^^^ more righardism

GDP in 2010 under Democrats:

2010Q1: 1.5
2010Q2: 3.7
2010Q3: 3.0
2010Q4: 2.0

Unemployment rate in 2010 under Democrats:

9.9% to 9.3%

Number of employed in 2010 under Democrats:

increased 1 million jobs from 129,804,000 to 130,839,000​

... which shows you lied when you tried to frame the turn-around in the economy was due to Republicans taking control of the House in 2011. The economy had already been a full year into the recovery by the time that occurred.

 

[Faun]

Look I live in Hampton Roads Virginia. The largest Naval port in the world. His plans to slash the military was enough to send this place into a panic. They were right. He hurt the military immensely. There were shipyards that had no military vessel for months. A lot of them turned to container and cruise ships to stay afloat. Some didn't make it and were bought by bigger firms. We have all the services here. Army, Navy, Coast Guard, Air Force, Marines, and Merchant Marines. A few others I won't mention. This area was practically destroyed by Obama.

Obama spent more on the military than did Bush II, so it seems you again are a bit off.

Most of the cuts to the military were forced by the Budget Control Act of 2011 aka sequestration. This bill was passed in the House 269–161. 174 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted for it and the Senate 74–26. Those cuts were made deeper in 2013 with a vote of 332-94 in the House and 64-36 in the Senate.

To blame Obama alone is to ignore the part even the GOP played in this...but that is what partisans do.

Here I will just let you read it for yourself.

PolitiFact Sheet: Military spending under Obama and Congress

LOLOL

From your own link ...

Spending increased in 2010 and 2011 but it has fallen every year for four years since then by a cumulative 15 percent.​

So it increased under Democrats controlling the House but fell once Republicans took control of the House.

Remember, you were the one to brag about Republicans taking over the House in 2011 and of course, not a dime can be spent on the military without the House's consent.

 

[flack]

Yep. The question is why. He wasn't running for office or was he?

He was being groomed for the future, the use of signs that way get people to thinking about him in the correct manner. He just arrived earlier than most thought he would.

Not me. He was perfect for their plan. Young, charismatic, family man and the most important part black. The poll at the church at the corner opens at six. My house is about a football field and a half from there. At 5:45 people were parking in front of my house because there was no place else to park. All black. I had to stand in line for a hour ans a half to vote. Normally takes 5 minutes. A blind man could see that coming.

So, now you are saying you saw it coming during the voting, before it you saw it coming when Obama was polling 30 points below Hillary.

You need to work on keeping your story straight.

Hillary was a lousy candidate. No I'm saying I knew that if he announced he would get almost 100% of the black vote. That alone would let him win. He announced and we, along with a lot of others, began cutting the deadwood(higher unemployment), stopped investing in new equipment(economy slows down), and waited it out(stagnate economy). You have to remember the Congress was run by democrats from January 2007 to January 2011. It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit. Obama and the democrats screwed up by wasting so much time on Obamacare. They should have steamrolled their socialist agenda through first and then did Obamacare.

"It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit."

^^^ more righardism

GDP in 2010 under Democrats:

2010Q1: 1.5
2010Q2: 3.7
2010Q3: 3.0
2010Q4: 2.0

Unemployment rate in 2010 under Democrats:

9.9% to 9.3%

Number of employed in 2010 under Democrats:

increased 1 million jobs from 129,804,000 to 130,839,000​

... which shows you lied when you tried to frame the turn-around in the economy was due to Republicans taking control of the House in 2011. The economy had already been a full year into the recovery by the time that occurred.

Yes because the election was known. The economy would have improved if Obama did nothing. Recessions are cyclical.

 

[AntonToo]

He was being groomed for the future, the use of signs that way get people to thinking about him in the correct manner. He just arrived earlier than most thought he would.

Not me. He was perfect for their plan. Young, charismatic, family man and the most important part black. The poll at the church at the corner opens at six. My house is about a football field and a half from there. At 5:45 people were parking in front of my house because there was no place else to park. All black. I had to stand in line for a hour ans a half to vote. Normally takes 5 minutes. A blind man could see that coming.

So, now you are saying you saw it coming during the voting, before it you saw it coming when Obama was polling 30 points below Hillary.

You need to work on keeping your story straight.

Hillary was a lousy candidate. No I'm saying I knew that if he announced he would get almost 100% of the black vote. That alone would let him win. He announced and we, along with a lot of others, began cutting the deadwood(higher unemployment), stopped investing in new equipment(economy slows down), and waited it out(stagnate economy). You have to remember the Congress was run by democrats from January 2007 to January 2011. It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit. Obama and the democrats screwed up by wasting so much time on Obamacare. They should have steamrolled their socialist agenda through first and then did Obamacare.

"It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit."

^^^ more righardism

GDP in 2010 under Democrats:

2010Q1: 1.5
2010Q2: 3.7
2010Q3: 3.0
2010Q4: 2.0

Unemployment rate in 2010 under Democrats:

9.9% to 9.3%

Number of employed in 2010 under Democrats:

increased 1 million jobs from 129,804,000 to 130,839,000​

... which shows you lied when you tried to frame the turn-around in the economy was due to Republicans taking control of the House in 2011. The economy had already been a full year into the recovery by the time that occurred.

Yes because the election was known. The economy would have improved if Obama did nothing. Recessions are cyclical.

Stop running your ignorant mouth, no one knows for sure what would have been without Bails, Stimulus and QE Obama admin steadfastly oversaw.

More than likely recession would have been considerably deeper without Obama's (and Bush's btw) expansionary policies.

 

[flack]

Not me. He was perfect for their plan. Young, charismatic, family man and the most important part black. The poll at the church at the corner opens at six. My house is about a football field and a half from there. At 5:45 people were parking in front of my house because there was no place else to park. All black. I had to stand in line for a hour ans a half to vote. Normally takes 5 minutes. A blind man could see that coming.

So, now you are saying you saw it coming during the voting, before it you saw it coming when Obama was polling 30 points below Hillary.

You need to work on keeping your story straight.

Hillary was a lousy candidate. No I'm saying I knew that if he announced he would get almost 100% of the black vote. That alone would let him win. He announced and we, along with a lot of others, began cutting the deadwood(higher unemployment), stopped investing in new equipment(economy slows down), and waited it out(stagnate economy). You have to remember the Congress was run by democrats from January 2007 to January 2011. It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit. Obama and the democrats screwed up by wasting so much time on Obamacare. They should have steamrolled their socialist agenda through first and then did Obamacare.

"It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit."

^^^ more righardism

GDP in 2010 under Democrats:

2010Q1: 1.5
2010Q2: 3.7
2010Q3: 3.0
2010Q4: 2.0

Unemployment rate in 2010 under Democrats:

9.9% to 9.3%

Number of employed in 2010 under Democrats:

increased 1 million jobs from 129,804,000 to 130,839,000​

... which shows you lied when you tried to frame the turn-around in the economy was due to Republicans taking control of the House in 2011. The economy had already been a full year into the recovery by the time that occurred.

Yes because the election was known. The economy would have improved if Obama did nothing. Recessions are cyclical.

Stop running your ignorant mouth, no one knows for sure what would have been without Bails, Stimulus and QE Obama admin steadfastly oversaw.

More than likely recession would have been considerably deeper without Obama's (and Bush's btw) expansionary policies.

bs Porkulus did nothing but put $750 billion into democrat hands. One big slush fund. At least TARP was mostly paid back.

 

[Faun]

Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time

How many times are you worthless lying scum POS right-wingers going to mindlessly parrot this LIE?????
As you well know PT jobs for economic reasons went DOWN after the passage of the PPACA!!!!!

And how many times do honest people like ME who put the links and substantiation have to contend with people like YOU that state your own personal, subjective and total ignorant comments? PLEASE provide PROOF as I did to back up my statements. WHERE is your PROOF!!!

You have NO proof of anything only OPINIONS by biased hacks! And you know it. There is no data that supports your lies, the actual data shows that PT jobs for economic reasons, and the PPACA would be such an economic reason as your lying sources claim, DECREASED since the law was passed. And the data is easy to find, so there is no excuse for your sources lies, since the BLS specifically tracks PT jobs for economic reasons every month and reports it every month!!!!!

When the PPACA passed in March 2010 there were 9,126,000 working PT for economic reasons, when Obama left office it was down to 5,664,000. It is now 4,111,000
Here is the link to the BLS data:
Table A-8. Employed persons by class of worker and part-time status
Scroll down to PERSONS AT WORK PART TIME,
select Part time for economic reasons seasonally adjusted and then scroll down further and click on "retrieve data."

The ONLY source of your data is BLS.
I have 3 distinct studies as multiple sources:

Marcus Dillender Carolyn Heinrich Susan Houseman Upjohn Institute Vanderbilt University Upjohn Institute
Using monthly CPS data, we estimate that the ACA resulted in an increase in low-hours, involuntary part-time employment of a half-million to a million workers in retail, accommodations, and food services, the sectors in which employers are most likely to reduce hours if they choose to circumvent the mandate, and also the sectors in which low-wage workers are most likely to be affected.
Additionally, employers may choose to outsource certain tasks to firms with fewer than 50 full-time employees. Ironically, the employer mandate could reduce the quality of jobs for low- and middle-skilled workers by increasing the share of low-hours part-time, temporary, and contract employment—categories that often are associated with relatively low compensation and job instability.

https://my.vanderbilt.edu/carolynhe...ffects-ACA-on-Part-time-employment-6-9-16.pdf

According to a new U.S. Chamber of Commerce July survey, nearly three-fourth of small businesses say the ACA makes it harder to hire workers and 61 percent do not plan to take on additional hires next year.
According to The New York Times Economix blogger Annie Lowrey, “The Affordable Care Act gives employers an incentive to hire part-time workers rather than full-time workers, as they might be compelled to offer health coverage to the latter, but not the former. That’s why a number of big employers have started offering more temporary or part-time positions.” Reuters reported on June 13 that Wal-Mart has already implemented a strategy of hiring more temporary workers

Major Newspapers link Obamacare to Increase in Part-time and Temp Jobs; Networks Ignore

A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.
The study shows that the jobs were temporary, contract positions, or part-time "gig" jobs in a variety of fields.
shows that the proportion of workers throughout the U.S., during the Obama era, who were working in these kinds of temporary jobs, increased from 10.7% of the population to 15.8%.

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

LOLOL

You're beyond fucking rightarded.

Your first link is based on the same exact data from the BLS which actually shows part time jobs for economic reasons rising dramatically during Bush's Great Recession before leveling off. Meaning the jobs added under Obama after Bush's Great Recession were full time jobs...

Your second link is pure bullshit as it points out...

Yet from Feb. 1, 2013 through July 26, 2013, ABC, CBS and NBC have not mentioned that link between Obamacare’s insurance regulations and a record high of temporary and part-time jobs once on the evening news shows.​

... yet the chart I posted above actually shows part time jobs for economic reasons declining by 52,000 during that period from 8,151,000 to 8,099,000 and other temporary jobs were full time jobs.

Your third link has been thoroughly debunked since despite its headline blaming Obama, it was actually based on a study beginning years before Obama and included the fallout from Bush's Great Recession, as shown in the BLS chart above.

 

[Faun]

Doesn't alter his position ONE bit.
He didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie in 2003 and then he corrected himself in 2010. Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

"Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

Your above statement is NOT believable as you have NO proof. No links. No substantiation. Just your biased uninformed opinion.
This makes your statement less believable than mine as I have exact quotes And links.
Where are yours?

Great, then post a list of all the GSE oversight bills passed by the Republican-led House or Republican-led Senate during those years....

 

[Faun]

He was being groomed for the future, the use of signs that way get people to thinking about him in the correct manner. He just arrived earlier than most thought he would.

Not me. He was perfect for their plan. Young, charismatic, family man and the most important part black. The poll at the church at the corner opens at six. My house is about a football field and a half from there. At 5:45 people were parking in front of my house because there was no place else to park. All black. I had to stand in line for a hour ans a half to vote. Normally takes 5 minutes. A blind man could see that coming.

So, now you are saying you saw it coming during the voting, before it you saw it coming when Obama was polling 30 points below Hillary.

You need to work on keeping your story straight.

Hillary was a lousy candidate. No I'm saying I knew that if he announced he would get almost 100% of the black vote. That alone would let him win. He announced and we, along with a lot of others, began cutting the deadwood(higher unemployment), stopped investing in new equipment(economy slows down), and waited it out(stagnate economy). You have to remember the Congress was run by democrats from January 2007 to January 2011. It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit. Obama and the democrats screwed up by wasting so much time on Obamacare. They should have steamrolled their socialist agenda through first and then did Obamacare.

"It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit."

^^^ more righardism

GDP in 2010 under Democrats:

2010Q1: 1.5
2010Q2: 3.7
2010Q3: 3.0
2010Q4: 2.0

Unemployment rate in 2010 under Democrats:

9.9% to 9.3%

Number of employed in 2010 under Democrats:

increased 1 million jobs from 129,804,000 to 130,839,000​

... which shows you lied when you tried to frame the turn-around in the economy was due to Republicans taking control of the House in 2011. The economy had already been a full year into the recovery by the time that occurred.

Yes because the election was known. The economy would have improved if Obama did nothing. Recessions are cyclical.

Stop lying.

The election wasn't known until nearly halfway through the 4th quarter.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Stop lying.

The election wasn't known until nearly halfway through the 4th quarter.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

The irony here is if he had his "clients" actually did what he claims, they did more damage to the economy than Obama...all because they thought Obama was something he is not.

 

[healthmyths]

Doesn't alter his position ONE bit.
He didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie in 2003 and then he corrected himself in 2010. Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

"Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

Your above statement is NOT believable as you have NO proof. No links. No substantiation. Just your biased uninformed opinion.
This makes your statement less believable than mine as I have exact quotes And links.
Where are yours?

Great, then post a list of all the GSE oversight bills passed by the Republican-led House or Republican-led Senate during those years....

You wrote: Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!
Why should I do YOUR job! You make the accusation. YOU prove it!
You are as bad as Schiff et.al. Democrats... YOU make up shit and then never back it up!
"For example : This is what Schiff did and this is what people remember... BUT it is entirely MADE UP by Schiff!
And what is the President’s response — well it reads like a classic organized crime shake down. In essence, what the President Trump communicates is this: We’ve been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what, I don’t see much reciprocity here. You know what I mean? I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you though. And I’m going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of dirt, on this and on that. I’m going to put you in touch with people, and not just any people. I’m going to put you in touch with the Attorney General of the United States — my Attorney General, Bill Barr — he’s got the whole weight of American law enforcement behind him. And I’m going to put you in touch with Rudy, you’re going to love him. Trust me. You know what I’m asking, so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I asked."
NOTHING but a gross LIE!
Adam Schiff Invents Transcript Of Trump Call With Ukraine President
So I'm calling on you Schiff-alike- BACK up your LIE with proof!
Otherwise you should change your name from "Faun" to "PHONY"!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Doesn't alter his position ONE bit.
He didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie in 2003 and then he corrected himself in 2010. Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

"Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

Your above statement is NOT believable as you have NO proof. No links. No substantiation. Just your biased uninformed opinion.
This makes your statement less believable than mine as I have exact quotes And links.
Where are yours?

Great, then post a list of all the GSE oversight bills passed by the Republican-led House or Republican-led Senate during those years....

You wrote: Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!
Why should I do YOUR job! You make the accusation. YOU prove it!
You are as bad as Schiff et.al. Democrats... YOU make up shit and then never back it up!
"For example : This is what Schiff did and this is what people remember... BUT it is entirely MADE UP by Schiff!
And what is the President’s response — well it reads like a classic organized crime shake down. In essence, what the President Trump communicates is this: We’ve been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what, I don’t see much reciprocity here. You know what I mean? I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you though. And I’m going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of dirt, on this and on that. I’m going to put you in touch with people, and not just any people. I’m going to put you in touch with the Attorney General of the United States — my Attorney General, Bill Barr — he’s got the whole weight of American law enforcement behind him. And I’m going to put you in touch with Rudy, you’re going to love him. Trust me. You know what I’m asking, so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I asked."
NOTHING but a gross LIE!
Adam Schiff Invents Transcript Of Trump Call With Ukraine President
So I'm calling on you Schiff-alike- BACK up your LIE with proof!
Otherwise you should change your name from "Faun" to "PHONY"!

So, you want him to give you a list of all the bills that do not exist?

Really? That is what you are reduced to?

How pathetic.

 

[healthmyths]

Doesn't alter his position ONE bit.
He didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie in 2003 and then he corrected himself in 2010. Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

"Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

Your above statement is NOT believable as you have NO proof. No links. No substantiation. Just your biased uninformed opinion.
This makes your statement less believable than mine as I have exact quotes And links.
Where are yours?

Great, then post a list of all the GSE oversight bills passed by the Republican-led House or Republican-led Senate during those years....

You wrote: Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!
Why should I do YOUR job! You make the accusation. YOU prove it!
You are as bad as Schiff et.al. Democrats... YOU make up shit and then never back it up!
"For example : This is what Schiff did and this is what people remember... BUT it is entirely MADE UP by Schiff!
And what is the President’s response — well it reads like a classic organized crime shake down. In essence, what the President Trump communicates is this: We’ve been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what, I don’t see much reciprocity here. You know what I mean? I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you though. And I’m going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of dirt, on this and on that. I’m going to put you in touch with people, and not just any people. I’m going to put you in touch with the Attorney General of the United States — my Attorney General, Bill Barr — he’s got the whole weight of American law enforcement behind him. And I’m going to put you in touch with Rudy, you’re going to love him. Trust me. You know what I’m asking, so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I asked."
NOTHING but a gross LIE!
Adam Schiff Invents Transcript Of Trump Call With Ukraine President
So I'm calling on you Schiff-alike- BACK up your LIE with proof!
Otherwise you should change your name from "Faun" to "PHONY"!

So, you want him to give you a list of all the bills that do not exist?

Really? That is what you are reduced to?

How pathetic.

Hey... just mimicking Schiff, et.al. and you guys that are trying to impeach with nothing!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Doesn't alter his position ONE bit.
He didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie in 2003 and then he corrected himself in 2010. Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

"Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

Your above statement is NOT believable as you have NO proof. No links. No substantiation. Just your biased uninformed opinion.
This makes your statement less believable than mine as I have exact quotes And links.
Where are yours?

Great, then post a list of all the GSE oversight bills passed by the Republican-led House or Republican-led Senate during those years....

You wrote: Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!
Why should I do YOUR job! You make the accusation. YOU prove it!
You are as bad as Schiff et.al. Democrats... YOU make up shit and then never back it up!
"For example : This is what Schiff did and this is what people remember... BUT it is entirely MADE UP by Schiff!
And what is the President’s response — well it reads like a classic organized crime shake down. In essence, what the President Trump communicates is this: We’ve been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what, I don’t see much reciprocity here. You know what I mean? I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you though. And I’m going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of dirt, on this and on that. I’m going to put you in touch with people, and not just any people. I’m going to put you in touch with the Attorney General of the United States — my Attorney General, Bill Barr — he’s got the whole weight of American law enforcement behind him. And I’m going to put you in touch with Rudy, you’re going to love him. Trust me. You know what I’m asking, so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I asked."
NOTHING but a gross LIE!
Adam Schiff Invents Transcript Of Trump Call With Ukraine President
So I'm calling on you Schiff-alike- BACK up your LIE with proof!
Otherwise you should change your name from "Faun" to "PHONY"!

So, you want him to give you a list of all the bills that do not exist?

Really? That is what you are reduced to?

How pathetic.

Hey... just mimicking Schiff, et.al. and you guys that are trying to impeach with nothing!

He asked you for a list of list of all the GSE oversight bills passed by the Republicans...and you said "get them yourself"...even though you are smart enough to know there were none.

You should not mock Schiff....you are just like him.

 

[Faun]

Doesn't alter his position ONE bit.
He didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie in 2003 and then he corrected himself in 2010. Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

"Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

Your above statement is NOT believable as you have NO proof. No links. No substantiation. Just your biased uninformed opinion.
This makes your statement less believable than mine as I have exact quotes And links.
Where are yours?

Great, then post a list of all the GSE oversight bills passed by the Republican-led House or Republican-led Senate during those years....

You wrote: Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!
Why should I do YOUR job! You make the accusation. YOU prove it!
You are as bad as Schiff et.al. Democrats... YOU make up shit and then never back it up!
"For example : This is what Schiff did and this is what people remember... BUT it is entirely MADE UP by Schiff!
And what is the President’s response — well it reads like a classic organized crime shake down. In essence, what the President Trump communicates is this: We’ve been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what, I don’t see much reciprocity here. You know what I mean? I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you though. And I’m going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of dirt, on this and on that. I’m going to put you in touch with people, and not just any people. I’m going to put you in touch with the Attorney General of the United States — my Attorney General, Bill Barr — he’s got the whole weight of American law enforcement behind him. And I’m going to put you in touch with Rudy, you’re going to love him. Trust me. You know what I’m asking, so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I asked."
NOTHING but a gross LIE!
Adam Schiff Invents Transcript Of Trump Call With Ukraine President
So I'm calling on you Schiff-alike- BACK up your LIE with proof!
Otherwise you should change your name from "Faun" to "PHONY"!

"You wrote: Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!"

LOL

I didn't write that, ya dumb shit. <smh>

Now list all the GSE oversight bills the Republican-led House or Republican-led Senate passed while they were in control......

Here, I'll even get you started.....

1. H.R.1461 - Federal Housing Finance Reform Act of 2005___________


2. __________________________________________________________________

 

[healthmyths]

Doesn't alter his position ONE bit.
He didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie in 2003 and then he corrected himself in 2010. Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

"Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!

Your above statement is NOT believable as you have NO proof. No links. No substantiation. Just your biased uninformed opinion.
This makes your statement less believable than mine as I have exact quotes And links.
Where are yours?

Great, then post a list of all the GSE oversight bills passed by the Republican-led House or Republican-led Senate during those years....

You wrote: Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!
Why should I do YOUR job! You make the accusation. YOU prove it!
You are as bad as Schiff et.al. Democrats... YOU make up shit and then never back it up!
"For example : This is what Schiff did and this is what people remember... BUT it is entirely MADE UP by Schiff!
And what is the President’s response — well it reads like a classic organized crime shake down. In essence, what the President Trump communicates is this: We’ve been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what, I don’t see much reciprocity here. You know what I mean? I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you though. And I’m going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of dirt, on this and on that. I’m going to put you in touch with people, and not just any people. I’m going to put you in touch with the Attorney General of the United States — my Attorney General, Bill Barr — he’s got the whole weight of American law enforcement behind him. And I’m going to put you in touch with Rudy, you’re going to love him. Trust me. You know what I’m asking, so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I asked."
NOTHING but a gross LIE!
Adam Schiff Invents Transcript Of Trump Call With Ukraine President
So I'm calling on you Schiff-alike- BACK up your LIE with proof!
Otherwise you should change your name from "Faun" to "PHONY"!

"You wrote: Bush and the GOP didn't want to correct Fannie/Freddie either, but they just lied about it and pretended they did!"

LOL

I didn't write that, ya dumb shit. <smh>

Now list all the GSE oversight bills the Republican-led House or Republican-led Senate passed while they were in control......

Here, I'll even get you started.....

1. H.R.1461 - Federal Housing Finance Reform Act of 2005___________


2. __________________________________________________________________

I'm going to do something that you are intellectually and morally incapable of doing.
You are right. I was wrong. You didn't write:
"Now list all the GSE oversight bills the Republican-led House or Republican-led Senate passed while they were in control"
I admit when I'm wrong.
Since the only GSEs are:
Federal National Mortgage Assoc., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., Federal Home Loan Bank System and Farm Credit System,
there is limited number of oversight bills.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/budget/fy2018/gov.pdf
So what does your listing H.R. 1461 have to do with the issue?

 

[AntonToo]

So, now you are saying you saw it coming during the voting, before it you saw it coming when Obama was polling 30 points below Hillary.

You need to work on keeping your story straight.

Hillary was a lousy candidate. No I'm saying I knew that if he announced he would get almost 100% of the black vote. That alone would let him win. He announced and we, along with a lot of others, began cutting the deadwood(higher unemployment), stopped investing in new equipment(economy slows down), and waited it out(stagnate economy). You have to remember the Congress was run by democrats from January 2007 to January 2011. It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit. Obama and the democrats screwed up by wasting so much time on Obamacare. They should have steamrolled their socialist agenda through first and then did Obamacare.

"It wasn't till the republicans took back the House did people relax a bit."

^^^ more righardism

GDP in 2010 under Democrats:

2010Q1: 1.5
2010Q2: 3.7
2010Q3: 3.0
2010Q4: 2.0

Unemployment rate in 2010 under Democrats:

9.9% to 9.3%

Number of employed in 2010 under Democrats:

increased 1 million jobs from 129,804,000 to 130,839,000​

... which shows you lied when you tried to frame the turn-around in the economy was due to Republicans taking control of the House in 2011. The economy had already been a full year into the recovery by the time that occurred.

Yes because the election was known. The economy would have improved if Obama did nothing. Recessions are cyclical.

Stop running your ignorant mouth, no one knows for sure what would have been without Bails, Stimulus and QE Obama admin steadfastly oversaw.

More than likely recession would have been considerably deeper without Obama's (and Bush's btw) expansionary policies.

bs Porkulus did nothing but put $750 billion into democrat hands. One big slush fund. At least TARP was mostly paid back.

Democrat hands?? ...son, are you on drugs?

I dare you show a single partisan criteria to Stimulus spending and tax-cuts.

Stimulus fed $780 billion into a struggling economy, by putting money into people's pockets, paying for jobs, materials and education. Claiming that $780 billion somehow vanished into thin air without any effects is crazy nonsense.

 

[edthecynic]

Porkulus did nothing but put $750 billion into democrat hands. One big slush fund. At least TARP was mostly paid back.

DittoTard alert!