Obama's inexperience in perspective

Discussion in 'Congress' started by Jon, Aug 11, 2008.

  1. Jon
    Offline

    Jon The CPA

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    8,101
    Thanks Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Fayetteville, AR
    Ratings:
    +1,281
    RealClearPolitics - Articles - Why Obama is in Trouble

     
  2. busara
    Offline

    busara wanasiasa wapumbava

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,501
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    PA
    Ratings:
    +87
    experience is very important! thats why none of our soldiers should fight unless they have experience in live combat. and no one else should get a job unless they have experience doing exactly what the job will entail
     
  3. Red Dawn
    Offline

    Red Dawn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,224
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Liberal Socialist Paradise
    Ratings:
    +456

    I'd rather have a 72 year old president, who will be 76 years old at the end of his first term.
     
  4. Jon
    Offline

    Jon The CPA

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    8,101
    Thanks Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Fayetteville, AR
    Ratings:
    +1,281
    Your sarcasm is noted, busara, but your message is foolish.

    Running a country is something that certainly requires experience at a lower level. If you've worked at retail store for 10 years, would you like it if the new cashier were promoted to general manager over you just because he was well-liked?

    That's the same thing happening here. Many qualified politicians are overlooked because Obama forced himself to the forefront based on "likeability."
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2008
  5. Jon
    Offline

    Jon The CPA

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    8,101
    Thanks Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Fayetteville, AR
    Ratings:
    +1,281
    I'm not at all concerned about Obama's age. Clinton was younger, and he was a good President.

    Obama's lack of experience is what bothers me, among his many other unflattering qualities.
     
  6. Red Dawn
    Offline

    Red Dawn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,224
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Liberal Socialist Paradise
    Ratings:
    +456
    I'm pretty sure you weren't concerned with George Bush's lack of experience when he ran in 2000, so I'll chalk this thread up to partisan concern trolling.
     
  7. Jon
    Offline

    Jon The CPA

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    8,101
    Thanks Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Fayetteville, AR
    Ratings:
    +1,281
    I supported Gore in 2000, thank you very much.

    I'm not a Republican. I'm not a Democrat.

    How can you say someone wasn't concerned about Bush's lack of experience when they just said Clinton was a good President? That's silly.
     
  8. jreeves
    Offline

    jreeves Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,588
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +315
    That's what training is for correct? What training has Obama had? A civil rights organizer, a state senator or a US senator for less than 1 term? You do realize he stated he wasn't qualified correct? That's before he changed his position and now states that experience isn't important.
     
  9. Bern80
    Offline

    Bern80 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,094
    Thanks Received:
    720
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Ratings:
    +726
    I have all kinds of reasons as to why I won't vote for Obama, but experience, or lack there of, is not one of them.

    It is horribly overrated in therms of holding political office. In terms of the presidency it greatly decreases the number of eligible people that can become President. Last I checked the only two legal requirements were I believe being 35 years of age and a natural born U.S. citizen. But we have arrived at a place in our voting process where, in actuality, only previously elected officials can be President (which McCain/Feingold aided in). And we have the gall to wonder, why at the end of the day we see so little real change.

    IMO one of the best things we could do is elect non-carreer politicians to office. The irony is absolutely amazing to me that we complain about what an old boys club the government is or what a tight grip it has on us, or that they don't listen to us, or how they sell out for votes, yet we have thread like this complaining about the fact that essential a person must have been a politician for x amount of time to qualify for the job.
     
  10. Jon
    Offline

    Jon The CPA

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    8,101
    Thanks Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Fayetteville, AR
    Ratings:
    +1,281
    Obama has made it clear that putting a new politician in office won't change the status quo. He's just as dirty as McCain, with less than 1/3 the experience. He's just as quick to sell a vote as McCain is. He flips and flops more than McCain does. And he wants to be the candidate of "change."

    Change we can believe in? The only thing changing is Obama's stance on every issue.
     

Share This Page