Mr. Shaman
Senior Member
- May 4, 2010
- 23,892
- 822
- 48
So glad that you enjoyed the list...
unfortunately you have place the group in the wrong category.
The correct one is 'Amanuensis.'
Here we have a group of Democrat-liberal stenographers, who are the dutiful martinets of the left....
this is probably why the group brings a smile to your face.
Now to see their kind in action, let's move on to the Journolist listserv...
1. Daily Caller reporter Jonathan Strong lays out a strategy plotted by Journolist members to kill the Jeremiah Wright story during the 2008 primaries and to smear Barack Obamas critics as racists:
2. videos surfaced of Obamas pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U.S. government and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright .in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long nearly a year since Wrights remarks became public to dissociate himself from them.
3. Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged.
4. Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obamas relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obamas conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares and call them racists.
5. Ackerman appealed to the other members of the Journolist group: If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game theyve put upon us. Instead, take one of them Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.
Hot Air Daily Caller discovers Journolist plot to spike Wright story, smear conservatives as racists
Now, doesn't that kind of coordinated effort to subvert the truth and divide the nation make you proud?
Tell me, how often do you find youself just staring into the mirror, saying "where did I go wrong?"
Sorry PC...looks like a sideshow to me
The list of so called liberal journalists includes some of the finest journalists our country has ever produced
Care to list some distinguished right wing journalists?
You missed the point, Wingy...
no matter how they string words together, how can you not peer through the miasma and see that they are promoting a totalitarian, utopian, fascist ideology.
It is beyond me how intelligent, educated folks such as yourself can continue to follow a direction that has, time and again, resulted in tyranny, murder, mayhem...
it can only be the result of decades of indocrination.
So sad...not just for you, but for all of us.
the title Liberal Fascism comes from a speech delivered by H. G. Wells, one of the most important and influential progressive and socialist intellectuals of the 20th century. He wanted to re-brand liberalism as liberal fascism and even enlightened Nazism. He believed these terms best described his own political views views that deeply informed American progressivism and New Deal liberalism.
Basically, Wells believed parliamentary democracy is incapable of bringing about a proper political order. Only an authoritarian, technocratic elite can do so. But when the ideal order is realized, it will be in some ways liberal. One prosperous and progressive world community of just, kindly, free-spirited, freely-thinking, and freely-speaking human beings. Well, maybe. Accordingly, Wells fits Spencer Ackermans characterization: a liberal fascist is one who wont take his own side in a putsch.
Liberal Fascism: Wings Over the World Edition Crooked Timber
(emphsis mine)
"His most consistent political ideal was the World State. He stated in his autobiography that from 1900 onward he considered a World State inevitable. He envisioned the state to be a planned society that would advance science, end nationalism, and allow people to progress by merit rather than birth."
As-far-as murder and mayhem go, our Judeo/Christian-values have ALWAYS been well-represented in such pursuits!!