Obamacare decision: An intended consequence not considered by the left

M14 Shooter

The Light of Truth
Sep 26, 2007
37,246
10,484
1,340
Bridge, USS Enterprise
Senate rules do not allow a filibuster when the bill under consideration relates to imposing or repealing a tax; if the Republicans take the Senate and the Presidency, they can now repeal the individual mandate with a simple majority - they will not need sixty votes.
 
Senate rules do not allow a filibuster when the bill under consideration relates to imposing or repealing a tax; if the Republicans take the Senate and the Presidency, they can now repeal the individual mandate with a simple majority - they will not need sixty votes.

Lot of ifs there, I think democrats are familiar with the usual way republicans blow up the deficit.
 
Senate rules do not allow a filibuster when the bill under consideration relates to imposing or repealing a tax; if the Republicans take the Senate and the Presidency, they can now repeal the individual mandate with a simple majority - they will not need sixty votes.

I would agree.

Problem is, you get rid of the mandate, and insurance companies go bankrupt. Not something they will allow to happen.
 
Senate rules do not allow a filibuster when the bill under consideration relates to imposing or repealing a tax; if the Republicans take the Senate and the Presidency, they can now repeal the individual mandate with a simple majority - they will not need sixty votes.

I would agree.

Problem is, you get rid of the mandate, and insurance companies go bankrupt. Not something they will allow to happen.

No, because Romney will waive everyone's requirements to participate in this cluster at all.

Eventually Congress will be forced to sink this turd completely and come up with something that both parties can live with.
 
Senate rules do not allow a filibuster when the bill under consideration relates to imposing or repealing a tax; if the Republicans take the Senate and the Presidency, they can now repeal the individual mandate with a simple majority - they will not need sixty votes.
I would agree.
Problem is, you get rid of the mandate, and insurance companies go bankrupt...
Because...?
 
Senate rules do not allow a filibuster when the bill under consideration relates to imposing or repealing a tax; if the Republicans take the Senate and the Presidency, they can now repeal the individual mandate with a simple majority - they will not need sixty votes.

I would agree.

Problem is, you get rid of the mandate, and insurance companies go bankrupt. Not something they will allow to happen.

No, because Romney will waive everyone's requirements to participate in this cluster at all.

Eventually Congress will be forced to sink this turd completely and come up with something that both parties can live with.

Giving companies and unions unlimited waivers won't change the law that insurance companies can't discriminate against someone with pre-existing conditions. Everyone healthy will drop their coverage until they're sick. Companies will only have sick people as customers and that is not sustainable.
 
I would agree.

Problem is, you get rid of the mandate, and insurance companies go bankrupt. Not something they will allow to happen.

No, because Romney will waive everyone's requirements to participate in this cluster at all.

Eventually Congress will be forced to sink this turd completely and come up with something that both parties can live with.

Giving companies and unions unlimited waivers won't change the law that insurance companies can't discriminate against someone with pre-existing conditions. Everyone healthy will drop their coverage until they're sick. Companies will only have sick people as customers and that is not sustainable.

The requirements to follow the law will be waived.

Obama does such shit all the time.

karma sucks, don't it?
 
No, because Romney will waive everyone's requirements to participate in this cluster at all.

Eventually Congress will be forced to sink this turd completely and come up with something that both parties can live with.

Giving companies and unions unlimited waivers won't change the law that insurance companies can't discriminate against someone with pre-existing conditions. Everyone healthy will drop their coverage until they're sick. Companies will only have sick people as customers and that is not sustainable.

The requirements to follow the law will be waived.

Obama does such shit all the time.

karma sucks, don't it?

Waiving it for a period of time is one thing. Waiving it forever would be impeachable.
 
Giving companies and unions unlimited waivers won't change the law that insurance companies can't discriminate against someone with pre-existing conditions. Everyone healthy will drop their coverage until they're sick. Companies will only have sick people as customers and that is not sustainable.

The requirements to follow the law will be waived.

Obama does such shit all the time.

karma sucks, don't it?

Waiving it for a period of time is one thing. Waiving it forever would be impeachable.

Sorry. Barry made new rules, and you Libtards love him for it.


constitution.jpg
 
I would agree.

Problem is, you get rid of the mandate, and insurance companies go bankrupt. Not something they will allow to happen.

No, because Romney will waive everyone's requirements to participate in this cluster at all.

Eventually Congress will be forced to sink this turd completely and come up with something that both parties can live with.

Giving companies and unions unlimited waivers won't change the law that insurance companies can't discriminate against someone with pre-existing conditions. Everyone healthy will drop their coverage until they're sick. Companies will only have sick people as customers and that is not sustainable.
So... Obamacare's mandate that insurance companies accept patienst with pre-exsting conditiond is flawed because it will collapse the system.
Why do you support such a thing?

And further.... People can still opt of out insueance, they just pay a tax. Does that tax revenue go to the insurance companies to make up for the unencumbered revenue they lose from the heallty people not paying into the system? If not, then the individual mandate does nothing to allievate your concern.
 
Last edited:
Senate rules do not allow a filibuster when the bill under consideration relates to imposing or repealing a tax; if the Republicans take the Senate and the Presidency, they can now repeal the individual mandate with a simple majority - they will not need sixty votes.
:cuckoo:
good luck with that
Hope?
:eek:
Translaton:
You, as usual, have no effective response.
 
No, because Romney will waive everyone's requirements to participate in this cluster at all.

Eventually Congress will be forced to sink this turd completely and come up with something that both parties can live with.

Giving companies and unions unlimited waivers won't change the law that insurance companies can't discriminate against someone with pre-existing conditions. Everyone healthy will drop their coverage until they're sick. Companies will only have sick people as customers and that is not sustainable.
So... Obamacare's mandate that insurance companies accept patienst with pre-exsting conditiond is flawed because it will collapse the system.
Why do you support such a thing?

And further.... People can still opt of out insueance, they just pay a tax. Does that tax revenue go to the insurance companies to make up for the unencumbered revenue they lose from the heallty people not paying into the system? If not, then the individual mandate does nothing to allievate your concern.

It's only flawed when presented by itself. Just like the mandate is flawed when presented by itself. They work in tandem, which is why it's been so interesting to see "conservatives" scream about getting rid of the mandate and keeping the anti-pre-existing conditions rule.
 
Waiving it for a period of time is one thing. Waiving it forever would be impeachable.

Sorry. Barry made new rules, and you Libtards love him for it.

Let me know when you read up on this issue and want to talk like an adult.

Do you really think the voting public or courts would force insurance companies to sign up sick people for insurance coverage with the funding mechanisms for ObamaTax not in place?

ROTFL.gif
 
Giving companies and unions unlimited waivers won't change the law that insurance companies can't discriminate against someone with pre-existing conditions. Everyone healthy will drop their coverage until they're sick. Companies will only have sick people as customers and that is not sustainable.
So... Obamacare's mandate that insurance companies accept patienst with pre-exsting conditiond is flawed because it will collapse the system.
Why do you support such a thing?

And further.... People can still opt of out insueance, they just pay a tax. Does that tax revenue go to the insurance companies to make up for the unencumbered revenue they lose from the heallty people not paying into the system? If not, then the individual mandate does nothing to allievate your concern.

It's only flawed when presented by itself. Just like the mandate is flawed when presented by itself. They work in tandem, which is why it's been so interesting to see "conservatives" scream about getting rid of the mandate and keeping the anti-pre-existing conditions rule.

When the funding elements are repealed, the entire law goes down - as a practical matter.
 
Senate rules do not allow a filibuster when the bill under consideration relates to imposing or repealing a tax; if the Republicans take the Senate and the Presidency, they can now repeal the individual mandate with a simple majority - they will not need sixty votes.
Pelosi still says it's not a tax.
 
Senate rules do not allow a filibuster when the bill under consideration relates to imposing or repealing a tax; if the Republicans take the Senate and the Presidency, they can now repeal the individual mandate with a simple majority - they will not need sixty votes.

:cuckoo:


good luck with that

Hope?

:eek:

Everything he said is Factually True.

Not sure why you think he is Crazy to Point it out.
 

Forum List

Back
Top