ObamaCare And Sebelius...Contradiction Continues

The T

George S. Patton Party
May 24, 2009
48,111
5,582
1,773
What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
Wonder how this is going to play before the SCOTUS as in March...the SCOTUS plans to hear arguemnts on ObamaCare...(Decision will be in June)...

‘It Is Not, Per Se, a Tax’: Sebelius Contradicts Administration’s Legal Defense of Obamacare


Secretary Sebelius: Individual Mandate is Not a Tax - YouTube

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3Wrrx-GpgU&feature=player_embedded"]Paulsen Questions HHS Secretary Sebelius on Stifling Medical Device Tax - YouTube[/ame]

The New York Times confirmed Friday that in preparation for defending constitutionality of the Obamacare individual mandate in court, an Obama Justice Department legal brief argues that the penalty used to enforce the mandate is “a valid exercise” of Congress’s power to impose taxes. Mr. Obama’s own Justice Department further repudiates the President’s earlier statement by noting that the penalty is imposed and collected under the Internal Revenue Code, people must report it on their tax returns, and that the Congressional Budget Office estimates that it will cost Americans $4 billion a year. Yale Law School professor Jack Balkin told a meeting of progressive activists last month that President Obama “has not been honest with the American people about the nature of this bill. This bill is a tax.”

So which is it? Forced commerce...or Forced taxation?:eusa_whistle:
 
Last edited:
Wonder how this is going to play before the SCOTUS as in March...the SCOTUS plans to hear arguemnts on ObamaCare...(Decision will be in June)...

‘It Is Not, Per Se, a Tax’: Sebelius Contradicts Administration’s Legal Defense of Obamacare

Secretary Sebelius: Individual Mandate is Not a Tax - YouTube

Paulsen Questions HHS Secretary Sebelius on Stifling Medical Device Tax - YouTube

The New York Times confirmed Friday that in preparation for defending constitutionality of the Obamacare individual mandate in court, an Obama Justice Department legal brief argues that the penalty used to enforce the mandate is “a valid exercise” of Congress’s power to impose taxes. Mr. Obama’s own Justice Department further repudiates the President’s earlier statement by noting that the penalty is imposed and collected under the Internal Revenue Code, people must report it on their tax returns, and that the Congressional Budget Office estimates that it will cost Americans $4 billion a year. Yale Law School professor Jack Balkin told a meeting of progressive activists last month that President Obama “has not been honest with the American people about the nature of this bill. This bill is a tax.”

So which is it? Forced commerce...or Forced taxation?:eusa_whistle:

Another Democrat talking out of both sides of her ass.

Democrats are consistent:lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top