Obama won BECAUSE of his race

[Mr. Shaman]

A perfect storm.
8 years Bush
2 wars that the Democrats agreed on but decided to just blame Bush for them.

.....At least, that's what you "learn" on.....

....FAUX Noise!!!!!

 

[bobcollum]

What a stupid op.

Obama won because the Republican party was in shambles after failed policies and an assorted array of botches during the 2000's.

A bag of hammers could have won that election, so long as it wasn't a Republican bag of hammers.

 

[Lovebears65]

HilaRY was a much better candidate . So I agree that if Obama was not black he would not have got the nomination , Hilary would have. I for one would have preferred Hilary over Obama any day.

 

[bobcollum]

HilaRY was a much better candidate . So I agree that if Obama was not black he would not have got the nomination , Hilary would have. I for one would have preferred Hilary over Obama any day.

Wow, I didn't even think about that ridiculous angle.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

HilaRY was a much better candidate . So I agree that if Obama was not black he would not have got the nomination , Hilary would have. I for one would have preferred Hilary over Obama any day.

Be patient.

2016-bound!!!!


Everything's falling-into-place......

.....and, Republicans are goin' NUTZ!!!!!!


It's all good.

 

[WillowTree]

"I think they just played the race card on me" Bill Clinton

 

[rightwinger]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

Obama was more Qualified than Romney is now. Is Romney running on his race or lack of qualifications?

 

[Amelia]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

Obama was more Qualified than Romney is now. Is Romney running on his race or lack of qualifications?

Bullshit.

 

[Full-Auto]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

Obama was more Qualified than Romney is now. Is Romney running on his race or lack of qualifications?

 

[rightwinger]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

Obama was more Qualified than Romney is now. Is Romney running on his race or lack of qualifications?

Bullshit.

Own it

What has the failed governor of Massachusetts accomplished?

Want to start with Romneycare?

 

[Amelia]

Obama was more Qualified than Romney is now. Is Romney running on his race or lack of qualifications?

Bullshit.

Own it

What has the failed governor of Massachusetts accomplished?

Want to start with Romneycare?

Failed is your opinion. He was governor of Massachusetts. That gave him more experience than the less-than-one-term Senator without even going into his history of solving economic and managerial problems.

Romney would have known better than to throw water onto the economic recovery by taking his eye off the ball and wasting a year and a half inventing new regulations to bog down the country with.

 

[bobcollum]

Obama was more Qualified than Romney is now. Is Romney running on his race or lack of qualifications?

Bullshit.

Own it

What has the failed governor of Massachusetts accomplished?

Want to start with Romneycare?

He saved the Salt Lake Olympics, so what if it was with help from the big bad government?

 

[tererun]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

About the only thing I find lacking on Obama as a president is a backbone. He seems to be growing one ever since last summer when he learned there is no comprimise with racist assholes like yourself.

As a lweader Obama has far outdone Bush. Hwe actually put an end to Iraq. He is slow on getting out of afganistan, but he did have the courage to nail Osama in pakistan which bush was not ever going to do. He has kept the economy from collapse. Perhaps someone could have done better, but not with the opposition he gets for doing it. He actually did something to improve healthcare. Something that clinton failed on, and the republicans will never do despite the way health insurance companies were ruining people's lives. Then there is the stance he has taken on gay marriage and other social issues like immigration. We have not had a major terrorist attack like our last two presidents let happen.

All in all for a president he has done pretty well considering what we have had since nixon. He was a bit green in the beginning and certainly could have used a few more years in government, and perhaps an executive role, but he learned pretty quick. The guy is intelligent, he is well spoken, and he is not an illiterate goon like GWB.

if I had to look at people who were not qualified for the presidency in the past 40 years two people come to the front. First was the guy whos only qualification for leading was costarring with a monkey on TV, and GWB was a rich pampered snot who really should have never made it to the presidency as it was way out of his intellectual abilities.

But hey, keep going with your racism and your blind hate of obama. It seems that despite the opposition you throw his way he has the ability to rise above your idiocy and get the job done in ways no republican has. He may have gotten to the presidency early due to his color, but he certainly has not failed.

 

[Jackson]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

Can't agree. People were tired of war and the Hopey Changey Mantra was a winner. He promised the world and sounded good. But he was VERY poorly vetted.

To be honest the Republicans had a poor candidate running against him. After he won, I was hoping for a new nation of colorless biases. But as it turned out, he was pitting one group of people against another, not necessarily race, but all kinds of factions.

We should take the last election to heart and during primaries, not concede the encumbent the natural candidate and be open to third party candidates. VET our candidates and listen to debates!

 

[Charles_Main]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

Has much more to do with his Ideology than his Race. The Media just love Lefties, and will always try to prop them up when ever they can. Period.

He is being laughed off the Stage over seas. China thinks he is a light weight, and so does Iran. The EU just told him to STFU and go fix his own Debt Problems before Preaching to him, and Putin is playing him like a fiddle.

But here in the to left wing Media, He is still a Genius Super leader.

 

[WillowTree]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

Can't agree. People were tired of war and the Hopey Changey Mantra was a winner. He promised the world and sounded good. But he was VERY poorly vetted.

To be honest the Republicans had a poor candidate running against him. After he won, I was hoping for a new nation of colorless biases. But as it turned out, he was pitting one group of people against another, not necessarily race, but all kinds of factions.

We should take the last election to heart and during primaries, not concede the encumbent the natural candidate and be open to third party candidates. VET our candidates and listen to debates!

Well in that he can claim success. The DIVIDE has never been greater. yay obama. yay.

 

[tererun]

Bullshit.

Own it

What has the failed governor of Massachusetts accomplished?

Want to start with Romneycare?

Failed is your opinion. He was governor of Massachusetts. That gave him more experience than the less-than-one-term Senator without even going into his history of solving economic and managerial problems.

Romney would have known better than to throw water onto the economic recovery by taking his eye off the ball and wasting a year and a half inventing new regulations to bog down the country with.

No, his experience was lacking, of course Romney's is not much better considering he only served a term. Romney has two qualities he admits to in this election. the first is not being Obama, which is something most of us have. His other was serving as a CEO for Bain capital where he bankrupted a number of businesses, and improved the jobs situation and economy of China. Yeah, that might have made some money for bain investors, but simply Romney does not do well at leading in government. His own party chose him as the default because they could not get anyone better. That is not a glowing endorsement when your own party was looking to over 8 miserable failures before they settled on him.

look at all the people who were on top of Romney in the primaries. There was Yosemite Sam Rick Perry. A man whos idea of leading is shoot first and never ask questions. There was michelle bachman who cannot even figure out her husband is a flaming homosexual. There is newt gingrich who has never been able to balance his own finances and is known by many as rubber check bobble head man. There was neo nazi rick the dick santorum who couldn't even carry his own state. There was invisible man Ron Paul. There was even the pizza delivery guy herman Cain who sung pokemon tunes for us. All of these people were considered better than Romney, and the only thing that kept Romney on top was his money. Money which he got for selling out US workers, and which he kept from taxes by using his wife's ballarina horse as a write off.

Now please, vote for your idiot, but save the fairy tales about romney for your kids.

 

[Amelia]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

Can't agree. People were tired of war and the Hopey Changey Mantra was a winner. He promised the world and sounded good. But he was VERY poorly vetted.

To be honest the Republicans had a poor candidate running against him. After he won, I was hoping for a new nation of colorless biases. But as it turned out, he was pitting one group of people against another, not necessarily race, but all kinds of factions.

We should take the last election to heart and during primaries, not concede the encumbent the natural candidate and be open to third party candidates. VET our candidates and listen to debates!

You seem to be missing the point. He should have been knocked out in the primary. It's moot which Republican was running against him. He shouldn't have gotten that far. How did he make it past Hillary? Could a white man with less than half a senate term under his belt when he started running for president have beaten Hillary in the primary?

 

[tererun]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

Can't agree. People were tired of war and the Hopey Changey Mantra was a winner. He promised the world and sounded good. But he was VERY poorly vetted.

To be honest the Republicans had a poor candidate running against him. After he won, I was hoping for a new nation of colorless biases. But as it turned out, he was pitting one group of people against another, not necessarily race, but all kinds of factions.

We should take the last election to heart and during primaries, not concede the encumbent the natural candidate and be open to third party candidates. VET our candidates and listen to debates!

Well in that he can claim success. The DIVIDE has never been greater. yay obama. yay.

Yeah, i don't believe Obama made that divide. I would have to credit fox news the most for the inter party war. Obama did many things to try and be bipartisan, but he did not realize that the republicans want a war. One of his weaknesses was giving the village idiots a chance.

 

[bobcollum]

Any person with his qualifications - or lack there of -that was a male white person would be laughed off the stage

Can't agree. People were tired of war and the Hopey Changey Mantra was a winner. He promised the world and sounded good. But he was VERY poorly vetted.

To be honest the Republicans had a poor candidate running against him. After he won, I was hoping for a new nation of colorless biases. But as it turned out, he was pitting one group of people against another, not necessarily race, but all kinds of factions.

We should take the last election to heart and during primaries, not concede the encumbent the natural candidate and be open to third party candidates. VET our candidates and listen to debates!

You seem to be missing the point. He should have been knocked out in the primary. It's moot which Republican was running against him. He shouldn't have gotten that far. How did he make it past Hillary? Could a white man with less than half a senate term under his belt when he started running for president have beaten Hillary in the primary?

Just saying...making that claim without any proof, which obviously nobody has, won't get a warm reception from the more rational people on the board. It's kinda kooky.