Obama " We've got to get this Done"

Then flies of to a fundraiser on his "private Jet"

I don't know if this has been pointed out, but you're being completely dishonest to the conversation. Obama's "private jet" is actually owned by his employer, us. We own that jet and any president is allowed to use it as part of his job. It is first and foremost a security measure.

Attacking a sitting president because he's using Airforce One is idiotic.

Who do you think you're kidding? CEOs also don't own their "private jets." They're company property. For all intents and purposes, so long as Obama is President, Air Force one is his private jet.
 
Then flies of to a fundraiser on his "private Jet"

I don't know if this has been pointed out, but you're being completely dishonest to the conversation. Obama's "private jet" is actually owned by his employer, us. We own that jet and any president is allowed to use it as part of his job. It is first and foremost a security measure.

Attacking a sitting president because he's using Airforce One is idiotic.

:eek:That’s it? That’s all you got? I just said that in jest idiot, why didn't you answer my question? Because you have no answer? Figures Obama clone liberal at least you could have attempted to answer the question:eusa_eh:
 
Then flies of to a fundraiser on his "private Jet" oh yeah then to camp David. Hypocrite ?does he really want this done?


http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhDhES6kHrk&["]http://http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhDhES6kHrk&[[/URL]

Someone ought to ask him if he thinks the rich ought to pay more. When he says yes, ask him why he doesn't take out his checkbook and write the gov't a check, you know, lead by example. The repubs ought to agree to raise taxes on the lower 50% of income earners (since the dems want to raise taxes), just to see, if everything is really "on the table".
The Working People are....


They aren't paying ANY "income taxes" and they are getting refunds. How is that paying "their fair share"???????????????
How about if we stop giving people money that are not paying income tax, on top of "raising taxes" on those that pay NONE? Seriously, everyone wants to talk about compromise, let's talk about all the possibilities. It just might make those voting to take other's money, a little bit hesitant, if they realize how much they might lose while doing that.
 
Someone ought to ask him if he thinks the rich ought to pay more. When he says yes, ask him why he doesn't take out his checkbook and write the gov't a check, you know, lead by example. The repubs ought to agree to raise taxes on the lower 50% of income earners (since the dems want to raise taxes), just to see, if everything is really "on the table".
The Working People are....


They aren't paying ANY "income taxes" and they are getting refunds. How is that paying "their fair share"???????????????
How about if we stop giving people money that are not paying income tax, on top of "raising taxes" on those that pay NONE? Seriously, everyone wants to talk about compromise, let's talk about all the possibilities. It just might make those voting to take other's money, a little bit hesitant, if they realize how much they might lose while doing that.

Please don't quote the Sheman.
 

Forum List

Back
Top