Obama wants Credit and Federal Possible Federal Takeover of Palins Alaska Pipeline.

Jan 17, 2010
571
109
0
Mississippi
He wants the Government to get involved with the Alaska Gas Pipeline (largest private construction project ever in North America) that Palin visciously worked on and sealed the deal to get the construction deal finalized which was approved months ago when I reported it here. It will be a jobs creating mecca for years to come. This construction is also suppose to be a free market principles venture that Palin harped on. That is crucial in this venture.

Now Obama wants to have Federal Involvement by appointing Larry Persily as what you would call a Gas Pipeline Czar to oversee what is called a Obama Public Works Project. The Czar just happens to be a political rival of Sarah Palins who tried continuously to obstruct her getting her 2009 legislation passed as Governor in which she succeeded over him. Now Obama wants to reward him. Again Obama wants to do this as a strategy if he runs against her in 2012 so he can use Larry Persily to discredit Palin. Obama will use this construction project as his own jobs creation.

We need to find out everything about the Larry Persily and warn the public about this possible takeover of Palins triumph of getting this project finalized when no other Alaska predecessor could in over 30 years before her. Obama attempts to regulate and control the auto, health insurance, energy, banking & finance and today the fishing industries is more than enough to understand that this is a communist takeover of our country perpetuated by a marxist. This President has trouble with single ownership and private enterprise and freedom.

Click the link and sublinks within the article for a thorough understanding.

Conservatives4Palin.com: Obama Takes Increased Interest in Palin's Natural Gas Pipeline

Excerpts:

Almost one year ago, C4P predicted that the president would eventually attempt to take over, and take credit for, Governor Palin's work to get Alaska a natural gas pipeline (you can read more about AGIA here and here).


The president nationalized the auto industry, supported the financial bailouts and is currently attempting to nationalize health care, over the strong objections of the American people.

It's not a surprise that Obama might want to take credit for Palin's gas pipeline. After all, as Palin has pointed out over and over, America needs a source of clean, reliable energy that comes from domestic sources, thereby increasing our national security. But AGIA needs the free market to work. Much as he may wish to claim credit, Alaska's gasline should not become an Obama public works project.
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
The deal has not gone through, and contruction will probably not start for at least a few years.

too bad...just think of all the jobs he could take credit for creating

YOu do realize that the only thing Palin did, was find a buyer.( real hard in Alaska :D)
There wasn't even complete approval of the project.
It took 30 years since its inception and nobody could broker a deal until Palin got in office. She pushed for it aggresively and got the deal done. It was done in June of 2009. Now the project needs to get ready for construction.

Governor Palin 4 President: Investors Business Daily & Exxon: Gov Palin's Pipeline “VERY BIG HOME RUN”

In a major surprise, Exxon announced Thursday that it had forged a partnership with TransCanada, the Canadian pipeline company that holds the state license for Palin's $126 billion Alaska Gasoline Inducement Act project.


do not post articles in their entirety.-del
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He wants the Government to get involved with the Alaska Gas Pipeline (largest private construction project ever in North America) that Palin visciously worked on and sealed the deal to get the construction deal finalized which was approved months ago when I reported it here. It will be a jobs creating mecca for years to come. This construction is also suppose to be a free market principles venture that Palin harped on. That is crucial in this venture.

Now Obama wants to have Federal Involvement by appointing Larry Persily as what you would call a Gas Pipeline Czar to oversee what is called a Obama Public Works Project. The Czar just happens to be a political rival of Sarah Palins who tried continuously to obstruct her getting her 2009 legislation passed as Governor in which she succeeded over him. Now Obama wants to reward him. Again Obama wants to do this as a strategy if he runs against her in 2012 so he can use Larry Persily to discredit Palin. Obama will use this construction project as his own jobs creation.

We need to find out everything about the Larry Persily and warn the public about this possible takeover of Palins triumph of getting this project finalized when no other Alaska predecessor could in over 30 years before her. Obama attempts to regulate and control the auto, health insurance, energy, banking & finance and today the fishing industries is more than enough to understand that this is a communist takeover of our country perpetuated by a marxist. This President has trouble with single ownership and private enterprise and freedom.

Click the link and sublinks within the article for a thorough understanding.

Conservatives4Palin.com: Obama Takes Increased Interest in Palin's Natural Gas Pipeline

Excerpts:

Almost one year ago, C4P predicted that the president would eventually attempt to take over, and take credit for, Governor Palin's work to get Alaska a natural gas pipeline (you can read more about AGIA here and here).


The president nationalized the auto industry, supported the financial bailouts and is currently attempting to nationalize health care, over the strong objections of the American people.

It's not a surprise that Obama might want to take credit for Palin's gas pipeline. After all, as Palin has pointed out over and over, America needs a source of clean, reliable energy that comes from domestic sources, thereby increasing our national security. But AGIA needs the free market to work. Much as he may wish to claim credit, Alaska's gasline should not become an Obama public works project.

Can't say I'm surprised at all.

All of Ol'BO's little projects are failing so why not go for one thats ready to fly. A project that the very DUMB Palin engineered. LOL Anyone who considers this woman dumb is an idiot.

Will be interesting to see how the State of Alaska handles this situation.
 
Ahh yes her bridge to nowhere, for it before against it.


the pipleline will have to be a federal project since it requires a treaty or somesuch agreement with another country.
 
Ahh yes her bridge to nowhere, for it before against it.


the pipleline will have to be a federal project since it requires a treaty or somesuch agreement with another country.

B.S., we here in New Orleans have many sister agreements with Latin America... never had a need for federal involvement.

This is just the do-nothing Obama administration trying to take that which has already been done.
 
Ahh yes her bridge to nowhere, for it before against it.


the pipleline will have to be a federal project since it requires a treaty or somesuch agreement with another country.

B.S., we here in New Orleans have many sister agreements with Latin America... never had a need for federal involvement.

This is just the do-nothing Obama administration trying to take that which has already been done.

and those agreements required a US owned pipeline across their country?
 
too bad...just think of all the jobs he could take credit for creating

YOu do realize that the only thing Palin did, was find a buyer.( real hard in Alaska :D)
There wasn't even complete approval of the project.
It took 30 years since its inception and nobody could broker a deal until Palin got in office. She pushed for it aggresively and got the deal done. It was done in June of 2009. Now the project needs to get ready for construction.

Governor Palin 4 President: Investors Business Daily & Exxon: Gov Palin's Pipeline “VERY BIG HOME RUN”

In a major surprise, Exxon announced Thursday that it had forged a partnership with TransCanada, the Canadian pipeline company that holds the state license for Palin's $126 billion Alaska Gasoline Inducement Act project.


It's a big vote of confidence in Palin's top project from a by-the-books company known for its rigid investment standards. "We evaluated all the options and it came down to our belief that this approach with TransCanada and Exxon Mobil was going to be the most successful project," said Marty Massey, U.S. joint interest manager of Exxon Mobil Production Co. He said Exxon might look at expanding its participation.


Rival oil firms had whispered to IBD that it would never happen. "It's gonna happen and we're very excited about this development," Palin told "Good Morning America" on Friday.


Doubters of Palin's pipeline plan were numerous. Some said the pipeline would be too big to work, and that a rival BP/ConocoPhillips project, called Denali, would doom Palin's plan because Alaska didn't have enough natural gas for both.


Exxon's tilt toward TransCanada suggests the oil giant believes that's not true. Exxon is America's largest company, with extraction rights to a third of all Alaska's gas reserves. It can use them to fill either pipeline. "We will make a decision based on commercial reality," Massey said. "But ... why would we put our money and not our gas in the pipeline?"


Obama administration officials who had nothing to do with this, like Energy Secretary Ken Salazar, rushed to claim credit too.What better vote of confidence could there be?


Other doubters had suggested the pipeline could never happen because of a global gas glut, making the pipeline uneconomical. But with the project slated for completion in 2018, and the need for natural gas expected to rise between 20% and 40% by 2030, it's precisely now that such a project should be built.


"I think it's very shortsighted" to assume that"market conditions are going to stay as they are today," Palin told CNN. In an interview with IBD last July when gasoline hit $4 at the pump, she noted that if drilling had started in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge just five years ago, when policymakers were dismissing the idea of $100-a-barrel oil, "we wouldn't be in our predicament today."


This is another in a series of successful steps to build the world's largest commercial construction project. For this, credit Palin. Despite the too-hip ridicule of comedians like David Letterman, she was the one who got the pipeline past Alaska's legislature, something governors had tried -- and failed -- to do for 30 years. Other partners are sure to join, and the near-impossible task of bringing Alaskan energy to the continental U.S. is that much closer.


If there are any doubts left, note that it's Alaska's officials giving Palin the most credit. As Deputy Natural Resources Commissioner Marty Rutherford told IBD, Palin relentlessly drove this project, walking the process through the bureaucracy, asking questions, even going to Texas on Thursday to hear from Exxon itself.


"We're sitting here and in a short two-and-a-half years we have two premier companies in the world moving this process forward," said Alaska Natural Resources Commissioner Tom Irwin. "Thank you Gov. Palin, thank you participants and thank you Alaskans." With praise like this, maybe it's time Palin started getting some attention for helping to secure America's energy future -- and less for having to defend herself from the dirty jibes of over-the-hill comics. For Americans tired of high energy prices and dependence on foreign energy, Palin's hitting some very big home runs indeed.

So you just proved what I said, she just found a buyer. There is no deal to actually build it yet. It is like saying a realitor made the deal, when all they have done is hold the open house.:cuckoo:
 
Ahh yes her bridge to nowhere, for it before against it.


the pipleline will have to be a federal project since it requires a treaty or somesuch agreement with another country.

B.S., we here in New Orleans have many sister agreements with Latin America... never had a need for federal involvement.

This is just the do-nothing Obama administration trying to take that which has already been done.

BullsEye
 
Ahh yes her bridge to nowhere, for it before against it.


the pipleline will have to be a federal project since it requires a treaty or somesuch agreement with another country.

B.S., we here in New Orleans have many sister agreements with Latin America... never had a need for federal involvement.

This is just the do-nothing Obama administration trying to take that which has already been done.

BullsEye

Umm no , wrong end of bull.
The correct end has 2 eyes.
 
The United States owns 60% of the land in Alaska

http://dnr.alaska.gov/mlw/factsht/land_own.pdf

If we own the land the pipeline is going through...I want my cut as a US citizen

Of cxourse you do.
Gimme Gimme Gimme.
Not surprised to see you say that.

If there is a profit being made off of US land then the US taxpayer should receive their fair share of that profit.

You truly are a hypocrite, a liar and a loser.
Go away.
 

Forum List

Back
Top