Obama wall street ad

SniperFire

Senior Member
Feb 28, 2012
13,627
1,226
48
Inside Your Head
DEMOCRATS give this ad a 61% agreement on Obama's double-talk and hypocrisy regarding taking money from 'fat cats.'

Another deadly ad which only uses Obama's own lies against him. These ads are crushing him.

[youtube]9R_EuJbhbiE[/youtube]
 
i havent seen too many romney/rnc ads in florida yet, they should do one where they state the 100 billion or so wasted on green energy/solar projects,,,,yet he claims he needs to tax the rich? as if the failures were all the fault of the rich?
 
If some people didn't have their head so deep in the sand, they would realize Obama is the worst thing for the USA

These ads will be targeted at those people who usually don't pay attention and often still take the mainstream media's word for it.

They are absolutely deadly.
 
i havent seen too many romney/rnc ads in florida yet, they should do one where they state the 100 billion or so wasted on green energy/solar projects,,,,yet he claims he needs to tax the rich? as if the failures were all the fault of the rich?

^Government green energy loans creates 4-8$ in private lending for every 1$ of government investment.
^Government green energy loans default rate is anywhere from 0-20 times lower than private lending
Brookings: "DOE
Exclusive Timeline: Bush Administration Advanced Solyndra Loan Guarantee for Two Years, Media Blow the Story | ThinkProgress

furthermore when environmental and health effects are conclduede green energy costs half of what fossil fuels cost
So thx for proving that right-wingers are clueless people with their heads up their asses
 
The difference is that while both take corporate money Romney is the one who does the bidding of large corporations and special interests.
For example they take a lot of money from the bnakign industry but Romney the one who opposes Obama's policies making the banks pay back the government for the bailouts and creating an alternative to future bailouts
 
Last edited:
The difference is that while both take corporate money Romney is the one who does the bidding of large corporations and special interests.
For example they take a lot of money from the bnakign industry but Romney the one who opposes Obama's policies making the banks pay back the government for the bailouts and creating an alternative to future bailouts

Mindless and rambling.
 
The difference is that while both take corporate money Romney is the one who does the bidding of large corporations and special interests.
For example they take a lot of money from the bnakign industry but Romney the one who opposes Obama's policies making the banks pay back the government for the bailouts and creating an alternative to future bailouts

Mindless and rambling.

Yes I do realize that reality is mindless to you. But go on being a retard it is working out so far for you
 
The difference is that while both take corporate money Romney is the one who does the bidding of large corporations and special interests.
For example they take a lot of money from the bnakign industry but Romney the one who opposes Obama's policies making the banks pay back the government for the bailouts and creating an alternative to future bailouts

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Obama is Wall Street. And he has no problem taking money from the 1%.

Want to know why no one is being prosecuted for the Wall Street fiasco that led to the bail outs?

Obama hired his key bundlers who basically were in bed with Wall Street to run the Department of Justice. :lol:

" Attorney General Eric Holder: formerly of Covington & Burling law firm, in 2008 Holder himself represented big banks such as UBS and MBNA Bank. Holder was Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign co-chairman and raised $50,000 for the president’s campaign.

Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli: a managing partner at Jenner and Block law firm, whose clients include Merrill Lynch, Perrelli stepped down from his number-three position at DOJ in March. A former member of Obama’s National Campaign Finance Committee, Perrelli bundled $500,000 in campaign contributions.

Deputy Associate Attorney General Karol Mason: Karol Mason of Alston & Bird previously chaired the firm’s public finance group. She also bundled $500,000 for Obama. Holder awarded her a “Distinguished Service Award” for her work at the Department of Justice. Now, after almost three years at the Department of Justice, she has returned to Alston & Bird to work on their real estate finance and capital markets group.

Associate Attorney General Tony West: West was a partner at Morrison and Foerster law firm, whose clients include MF Global, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America. West was also co-chairman of Obama’s campaign and, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, “was instrumental in helping the candidate raise an estimated $65 million in California.” Formerly the head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, West is now number three at the DOJ and bundled $500,000 for the president’s campaign.

Despite Holder and Obama’s “get tough” rhetoric against Wall Street, to date, there has not been a single criminal charge filed by the federal government against any top executive of the elite financial institutions. "


Unprecedented: Top DOJ Officials Were Obama Bundlers with Wall Street Ties
 
The difference is that while both take corporate money Romney is the one who does the bidding of large corporations and special interests.
For example they take a lot of money from the bnakign industry but Romney the one who opposes Obama's policies making the banks pay back the government for the bailouts and creating an alternative to future bailouts

Mindless and rambling.

Yes I do realize that reality is mindless to you.

The reality, retard, is Obama is in bed with powerful corporate fat cats and interests in every way, despite his cheap rhetoric. The only ones buying it are his sheep.
 
The difference is that while both take corporate money Romney is the one who does the bidding of large corporations and special interests.
For example they take a lot of money from the bnakign industry but Romney the one who opposes Obama's policies making the banks pay back the government for the bailouts and creating an alternative to future bailouts

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Obama is Wall Street. And he has no problem taking money from the 1%.
Yes he has no problem taking their money but he doesn't and wont and hasn't bended over backwards to do what ever they want like Romney
Want to know why no one is being prosecuted for the Wall Street fiasco that led to the bail outs?
What are you talking about? Due to Obama polices all of the following have happend
^SEC fined Golden Sachs for illegal insider trading
^FEC sued large banks for causing the crisis
^Fined several banks related to mortgage fraud and abuse
^Anit-trust fines have increased by 50% in Obamas first year.
^Obama has ordered the justice department to stop and prevent speculation increasing oil and commodity prices.
^Made it legal for the justice department to sue private mortgage brokers and other non-bank lenders who commit fraud, and fraud involving future trading’s.
^Made it so the justice department could press charges against financial institutions for violating lending practices.
^Fined Optiver 14million for high-frequently oil speculation
^Made it illegal to overvalue assets.
^Obamas housing agency is set to sue and file suits against banking instructions for lying and committing fraud on mortgage securities
^Has fined banks tens of billions of dollars for false mortgage claims and other frauds that caused the financial crisis.
^Allowed the government to prosecute mortgage, foreclosure and other fraud

Furthermore the problem was that the banking crisis was caused by deregulation that occurred in the 90's/early 00's of which Obama has reinstalled those regulations
 
The difference is that while both take corporate money Romney is the one who does the bidding of large corporations and special interests.
For example they take a lot of money from the bnakign industry but Romney the one who opposes Obama's policies making the banks pay back the government for the bailouts and creating an alternative to future bailouts

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Obama is Wall Street. And he has no problem taking money from the 1%.
Yes he has no problem taking their money but he doesn't and wont and hasn't bended over backwards to do what ever they want like Romney
Want to know why no one is being prosecuted for the Wall Street fiasco that led to the bail outs?
What are you talking about? Due to Obama polices all of the following have happend
^SEC fined Golden Sachs for illegal insider trading
^FEC sued large banks for causing the crisis
^Fined several banks related to mortgage fraud and abuse
^Anit-trust fines have increased by 50% in Obamas first year.
^Obama has ordered the justice department to stop and prevent speculation increasing oil and commodity prices.
^Made it legal for the justice department to sue private mortgage brokers and other non-bank lenders who commit fraud, and fraud involving future trading’s.
^Made it so the justice department could press charges against financial institutions for violating lending practices.
^Fined Optiver 14million for high-frequently oil speculation
^Made it illegal to overvalue assets.
^Obamas housing agency is set to sue and file suits against banking instructions for lying and committing fraud on mortgage securities
^Has fined banks tens of billions of dollars for false mortgage claims and other frauds that caused the financial crisis.
^Allowed the government to prosecute mortgage, foreclosure and other fraud

Furthermore the problem was that the banking crisis was caused by deregulation that occurred in the 90's/early 00's of which Obama has reinstalled those regulations


Link, spammer?
 
and like i mentioned in another thread, GM isnt a succsess, u will never hear the left tell u how many GM employees lost jobs and dealers that were shut down thanks to the Obama/Pelosi/Ried Recession. Big deal, GM is pretty much down to Chevys. Does anyone see any new Pontiac and Oldsmobile dealerships popping up anywhere?
 
and like i mentioned in another thread, GM isnt a succsess, u will never hear the left tell u how many GM employees lost jobs and dealers that were shut down thanks to the Obama/Pelosi/Ried Recession. Big deal, GM is pretty much down to Chevys. Does anyone see any new Pontiac and Oldsmobile dealerships popping up anywhere?

Yes Obama who became president in 2009 caused a recession that started in 2008... reatard
 

Forum List

Back
Top