Obama v Bush effect on the deficit in one graph

What do you know about facts, asshole?

If Bush's deficits were sooo bad then why have the Democrats spent 5 years adding to them?
 
Obama’s and Bush’s effects on the deficit in one graph - The Washington Post

Okay, rw's, close your eyes, stamp your little feet and put your fingers in your ears.

:lol:

$8 trillion in losses due to dot.com bust/9/11 and worst hurricanes in history!

MOST of you ignorant as..wipe...s complain about BUSH administration BUT ignorantly leave out 5 EVENTS that at the minimum means $267 billion a year in lost tax revenue!
A) Did you know there was NO SURPLUS after Clinton?
That was a "phony" surplus because it along with $166 billion a year starting in
2002 IS BEING WRITTEN of tax able income by the likes of OBAMA no less!
Example: OBAMA deducted on page 7 of his 2009 Tax return $125,879 in when he sold
Inherited Assets of $480,908 in Bank of Hawaii for $355,029.. a loss which he deducted!
Line 10 Net long-term capital gain or (loss) OBAMA WROTE OFF $125,527!
TAX LOSS LOOPHOLE HE BITCHES ABOUT HE USED!!!

So you idiots.. LIKE OBAMA the $5 trillion lost in stock values due to the dot.com bust that supposedly left a "Clinton surplus"???? GONE!!!! and along with Obama tax payers and therefore US treasury don't RECEIVE $166 billion due to Long term capital LOSSES!!!

FACTS:"The Stock Market Crash of 2000-2002 caused the loss of $5 trillion in the market value of companies from March 2000 to October 2002.[13]
Dot-com bubble - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

B) IDIOTS DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENED 9/11/2001?? EVIDENTLY NOT!
The 9/11 terrorist destruction of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers,
killing almost 700 employees of Cantor-Fitzgerald, accelerated the
stock market drop; the NYSE suspended trading for four sessions.
The stock market lost 16% of its value on 9/11.
The stock markets themselves estimate the real costs to the market in lost value
and profits at close to $2 trillion over time.
Economic terrorism: Bin Laden was major contributor to budget deficit - National economic policy | Examiner.com

NOW you ass.wip...es BUSH BASHING IDIOTS as well as many of you so-called "conservatives" EXPLAIN why these LOSSES would NOT appear as on Obama's tax return over the next 30 years?? YOU CAN"T! IDIOTS!
$66 billion a year added to the $166 billion due to dot.com $232 billion in lost taxes!

C) IDIOTS do you think the worst hurricane SEASONS in HISTORY DID NOT have any losses??? How about over $1 trillion!
Worst hurricane SEASONS in history.. actual costs that were written off
Federal/State/Local income, sales, and property taxes over $1 trillion!
the Worst hurricane SEASONS.. (7 of the 10 worst hurricanes)
1. Katrina 2005 3 $81,000,000,000
3. Wilma (FL) 2005 3 $20,600,000,000
4. Ike (TX/LA/MS) 2008 2 $18,000,000,000
5. Charley (FL) 2004 4 $14,000,000,000
6. Ivan (FL/AL) 2004 3 $13,000,000,000
7. Rita (LA/TX) 2005 3 $10,000,000,000
9. Frances (FL) 2004 2 $8,860,000,000
12. Jeanne (FL) 2004 3 $6,500,000,000
http://www.epicdisasters.com/index.php/site/comments/the_ten_costliest_us_hurricanes/

So given nearly $8 trillion in losses the IRS allows tax payers to write off against income nearly $267 billion a year starting in 2002!

AND YET you ass.wipes make totally assine idiotic statements about Bush spending like a drunken sailor.. or "Bush was left a surplus" or Bush this bash..

YOU f..king IDIOTS!
IN spite of having to add $600 billion in a brand new agency ..duh Homeland Security, because you wimps were so glad Bush was going after the terrorists/ Saddam/etc.
74% of you supported that.. Bush had 90% approval rating after 9/11/2001 WHICH MEANS 9 out of 10 of you APPROVED!
So given the FACTS of
a) dot.com bust costing $5 trillion and lost tax write off $166 billion
b) 9/11 costing $2 trillion or $66 billion in lost tax revenue each year
c) Worst hurricanes costing $1 trillion or $33 billion a year..
PLEASE EXPLAIN in some other FASHION WHAT happened to the $267 billion a year
in TAXES that stopped coming in after 2002 when first writeoffs began?

WHAT HAPPENED to that $267 billion a year????
And OBAMA writes off $100,000 a year as part of the above $267 billion!!!
 
Never mind Miss Stephanies whining, I really am interested in knowing the facts of this. Since you seem to have a different set of numbers at your fingertips, I wonder if you would mind posting them.

Thanks ever so much.

(jk cuz i know you don't.)

I don't blame you for not wanting to post this hilarious graph. So don't blame me for wanting to post it.

24editorial_graph2-popup.gif

Without getting into too much detail (because I don't need to nor does your linked article deserve it) I'll point out a couple blatantly obvious problems with this graph:

There's no accounting for defense spending under Obama while there is for Bush. Continuing Bush's foreign wars and even adding another conflict IS NOT mandatory spending so the fact that it isn't included for Obama tells you all you need to know about your source. Here is what the NY Times didn't want its readers to see:

800px-U.S._Defense_Spending_Trends.png
Expenditures in the United States federal budget - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Then there's the fact that the $1.76T price tag of Obamacare alone exceeds the TOTAL COST of $1.44T calculated for Obama.

If you want to argue about the deficit, I'd advise you to consult actual verifiable data:

Historical Tables | The White House
http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/120xx/doc12039/historicaltables[1].pdf

Spending for the wars still falls under Bush. He failed to wrap them up before leaving office.

Being that they were "Wars of Choice" that was pretty fucked up of him.

That is fucking ridiculous. Obama campaigned on ramping up Afghan troops and the war there and ending the Iraq war as "one of his first items". He did one, not the other and yet Bush, 3 years after his departure from office still holds the spending blame??

You fuckers are pathetic.
 
Why hasn't Obama ended the war in afghan then? Why did he wait until the Bush timeline to withdraw from Iraq?

You democrats simply, absolutely REFUSE to put any blame on this administration. It's embarrassing.
 
Luddly - Thanks for the laughs. Seeing the radical right squirm, spew, rant, curse and generally go all apopletic when their delusions are disproven is HILARIOUS.
 
Obama’s and Bush’s effects on the deficit in one graph - The Washington Post

Okay, rw's, close your eyes, stamp your little feet and put your fingers in your ears.

:lol:

your only purpose on this board is to stir up shit, isn't it?
everything with you is rw's this wr's that..
you are the one who stamps your little feet and puts your fingers in your ears..and bore most on this board with it.

Textbook projection.

Nice.

:clap2:
 
Obama’s and Bush’s effects on the deficit in one graph - The Washington Post

Okay, rw's, close your eyes, stamp your little feet and put your fingers in your ears.

:lol:

your only purpose on this board is to stir up shit, isn't it?
everything with you is rw's this wr's that..
you are the one who stamps your little feet and puts your fingers in your ears..and bore most on this board with it.

Textbook projection.

Nice.

:clap2:

No, textbook reporting.
You fail.
 

Forum List

Back
Top