Obama tries to pull biggest con job in history

[teapartysamurai]

The Role Model: What Obama Sees in Reagan - TIME

Read all here!

Does ANYONE believe for one minute that Obama has "seen the light" and will now model himself after Reagan???????

After Obama sought to be everything Reagan was NOT, now he is going to try and come off like Reagan????

Is anyone dumb enough to fall for this?

This reminds me of that makeup that Gore wore during the 2000 election in which he tried to look like Reagan, as IF that would fool everyone.

It didn't work then and it SURE isn't going to work now.

You can't take a socialist's sow's ear and turn it into a Reagan silk purse.

The only people I see falling for this is the liberal media, who would sallow ANYTHING Obama tells them.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The Obama admin IS one giant con job.

 

[naomibee]

and the sad thing is most of his followers will not listen to reason.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Obama tries to pull biggest con job in history

The biggest con job in history has already been done......and, we've got the body-count to prove it.

​

 

[BlindBoo]

I have to wonder if TPS even read the entire article.

 

[Dr.Drock]

Obama already has modeled himself after Reagan.

Spend what you don't have, grow debt, spend what you don't have, grow debt, spend what you don't have, grow debt.

and repeat

 

[mdn2000]

Obama tries to pull biggest con job in history

The biggest con job in history has already been done......and, we've got the body-count to prove it.

​

Your right, ths is the biggest Con job in history with a whole lot of players like Nany Pelosi and John Kerry who personally investigated Iraq prior to Cheney.

Why do so many people not see a team playing together for the last twenty years, Congress, the White House, everyone in Government working for themselves and not the American people.

 

[Dr.Drock]

Obama tries to pull biggest con job in history

The biggest con job in history has already been done......and, we've got the body-count to prove it.

​

Your right, ths is the biggest Con job in history with a whole lot of players like Nany Pelosi and John Kerry who personally investigated Iraq prior to Cheney.

Why do so many people not see a team playing together for the last twenty years, Congress, the White House, everyone in Government working for themselves and not the American people.

Yeah democrats like to pretend their group of heros didn't favor the War in Iraq, reality simply doesn't agree, check the voting record.

 

[8537]

The biggest con job in history has already been done......and, we've got the body-count to prove it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o​

Your right, ths is the biggest Con job in history with a whole lot of players like Nany Pelosi and John Kerry who personally investigated Iraq prior to Cheney.

Why do so many people not see a team playing together for the last twenty years, Congress, the White House, everyone in Government working for themselves and not the American people.

Yeah democrats like to pretend their group of heros didn't favor the War in Iraq, reality simply doesn't agree, check the voting record.

The voting record shows that more Democrats voted to oppose the AUMF than support it.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Reagan wasn't Reagan enough for you twats.

Can I translate that?

You guys are too STUPID TO FALL FOR THIS CON JOB. The smart people would fall for it!

Believe it or not, liberals DO think that way.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Obama tries to pull biggest con job in history

The biggest con job in history has already been done......and, we've got the body-count to prove it.​

Typical liberals!​

Faced with evidence they can't deny, they just cry:​

But, but, Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuush!!!!!!!!!!!!! ​

You notice these paid, er I mean unpaid volunteers don't even TRY to defend Obama, anymore?​

​

 

[teapartysamurai]

I have to wonder if TPS even read the entire article.

Yes and I read between the lines.

I KNOW these liberal media types. They have all drunk the koolaid and they are all doing to do exactly what Obama and the DNC ask them to do.

It's obvious the media template at the moment is, Obama is "moving to the center." He's studying Reagan to see where he can be better, blah blah blah.

It's pretty damn obvious.

What's even more obvious is you libs can't even DENY it's a con job.

When liberals are losing, they try to make the debate about you, instead of the actual subject.

That's called a deflection, and as usual, it was obvious, and as usual, it didn't work.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Well perhaps obama has decided to alienate his base.

 

[boedicca]

The only way in which Obama is actually inspired to be like Reagan is the area of mediocre acting.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Your right, ths is the biggest Con job in history with a whole lot of players like Nany Pelosi and John Kerry who personally investigated Iraq prior to Cheney.

Why do so many people not see a team playing together for the last twenty years, Congress, the White House, everyone in Government working for themselves and not the American people.

Yeah democrats like to pretend their group of heros didn't favor the War in Iraq, reality simply doesn't agree, check the voting record.

The voting record shows that more Democrats voted to oppose the AUMF than support it.

Really??????

CLINTON: Good evening. Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors. Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world, Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons. I want to explain why I have decided, with the unanimous recommendation of my national security team, to use force in Iraq; why we have acted now; and what we aim to accomplish. Six weeks ago, Saddam Hussein announced that he would no longer cooperate with the United Nations weapons inspectors called UNSCOM. They are highly professional experts from dozens of countries. Their job is to oversee the elimination of Iraq's capability to retain, create and use WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, and to verify that Iraq does not attempt to rebuild that capability.

　

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION PROGRAMS." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his WEAPONS PROGRAMS. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." -- From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others

Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION PROGRAMS. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998

"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002

"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, AND WILL KEEP TRYING TO DEVELOP NUCLEAR WEAPONS. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998

Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to BUILD NUCLEAR WEAPONS, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction." -- Dick Gephardt in September of 2002

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Bob Graham, December 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." -- Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002

"Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq's denials, U.N. inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that Iraq's claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction." -- Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources -- something that is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both against Iraq’s enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

 

[Dr.Drock]

Your right, ths is the biggest Con job in history with a whole lot of players like Nany Pelosi and John Kerry who personally investigated Iraq prior to Cheney.

Why do so many people not see a team playing together for the last twenty years, Congress, the White House, everyone in Government working for themselves and not the American people.

Yeah democrats like to pretend their group of heros didn't favor the War in Iraq, reality simply doesn't agree, check the voting record.

The voting record shows that more Democrats voted to oppose the AUMF than support it.

29 democratic senators voted for it, 21 against it. Congress is most responsible for wars.

 

[8537]

Yeah democrats like to pretend their group of heros didn't favor the War in Iraq, reality simply doesn't agree, check the voting record.

The voting record shows that more Democrats voted to oppose the AUMF than support it.

Really??????


　

"Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both against Iraq’s enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

Yes, really!

82 Yay's, 126 No's in the House
29 Yays, 21 No's in the Senate
=
111 Yay's, 147 Nay's by Dems.

 

[Dr.Drock]

The voting record shows that more Democrats voted to oppose the AUMF than support it.

Really??????


　

"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

Yes, really!

82 Yay's, 126 No's in the House
29 Yays, 21 No's in the Senate
=
111 Yay's, 147 Nay's by Dems.

Those numbers are correct, my hope is over the years you've placed the appropriate amount of blame on the democrats who did vote in favor of it and not just placed sole blame on the Iraq disaster on republicans.

Most democrats I've spoken to place no blame on their party, and also are completely ignorant on how many Iraqi's (mainly children) were killed during the Clinton era because of his policies towards the country with regards to the embargo.

 

[8537]

Really??????


　

Yes, really!

82 Yay's, 126 No's in the House
29 Yays, 21 No's in the Senate
=
111 Yay's, 147 Nay's by Dems.

Those numbers are correct, my hope is over the years you've placed the appropriate amount of blame on the democrats who did vote in favor of it and not just placed sole blame on the Iraq disaster on republicans.

Most democrats I've spoken to place no blame on their party, and also are completely ignorant on how many Iraqi's (mainly children) were killed during the Clinton era because of his policies towards the country with regards to the embargo.

The Democrats who voted for it shoulder some blame. The Republicans who voted for it shoulder some blame. The vast majority of the blame, however, goes to the administration that advocated invading Iraq from day one and used 9.11 and bogus intelligence to condone their actions.

 

[xotoxi]

Obama tries to pull biggest con job in history

You really think that was a bigger con-job then Bernie Madoff?