Immanuel
Gold Member
- May 15, 2007
- 16,828
- 2,269
- 183
Hey, I think this guy is a whack job , horrible President to, but if we go around attacking everything he does no matter what it is, it just weakens the argument when we have a legitimate beef.
I don't attack everything he does.
I actually like the guy. In fact, I like him 10 times (at least) more than I ended up liking Bush. I just don't agree with Congress.
And I sure don't think we should be putting the man on a pedestal.
Our economy is in the toilet. I do not blame President Obama for that. I simply want him to work towards turning things around and broadband for the poor over food for the poor... well, food wins out in my books.
Immie
Yeah, that would make sense except it's not about food v prodicidng rural internet service.
In fact it's not about providing internet TO THE POOR, at all.
It's about providing service to areas where the population is too low for it to make economic sense for the internet providers to run the WIRES.
Hereabout that means about 1 mile off US route 1.
Most of the truly POOR don't live in rural areas, they live in URBAN areas.
IOts a good idea, just like it was a good idea to run electricity everywhere, to run phone lines everywhere, and to give POSTAL service everywhere.
The internet is way beyond the stage where it's a toy.
It's a utility, now, no less than the telephone or electricity.
And, even in these trying times, insuring that the "rural" areas (which includes one hell of a lot of suburbs, BTW) is just good policy.
THIS is actually a very good example of STIMILUS spending, acutally.
It puts people to work expanding it, it give the Internet providers more customers who will PAY for that service, PLUS it give people (rich AND poor) who live in blacked out broadband areas, access to the most AMAZING connumications system mankind has yet to invent.
I cannot believe that some of you are trying to make something so good into a partisan issue.
You people truly need a sense of perspective.
I appreciate your point of view. You make good points although, I do not know what you meant by this, "prodicidng" unknown word to me.
Your points are well taken and appreciated.
However, I am not making this a partisan issue. I am concerned about the unemployed and I blame both parties for that problem.
You have helped to change my point of view although I am still not sure that we should not be focusing on those who are struggling to put food on the tables and to keep roofs over their heads.
Thanks for your point of view. It has helped me in some ways to see things a little differently.
Immie