Obama -- The Job Killer

[HUGGY]

Obama to focus hard on economy after Democratic loss - CNN.com

"The president works each and every day on making our economy stronger and putting us in a position to where we're creating jobs, businesses are hiring again," Gibbs said. "I can certainly assure the American people that that is the chief focus of the president of the United States."


Obama is such a moron. He doesn't get it.

Every single proposal he has involves massive taxes.

Businesses are already struggeling and going bankrupt.

What does he think is going to happen when he imposes new taxes, when businesses already can't pay their current bills?

The way Obama proposes the private sector create jobs is by creating "green" jobs. However, I have yet to see any proof that there is a real demand for them, other than what Obama and his minions want.

If he truely wants to create jobs, he should immediately enact across the board tax reductions. This is how you create jobs. You give people more of their own money to help create jobs.

You are an idiot. You know little or nothing about what causes businesses to go bankrupt and fail. Listen up twit. Businesses fail because thier markets and customers dry up. They fail when they cannot finance expansion or bridge financial gaps between orders and payment for delivered goods or services. Morons like you think ...because you heard it somewhere that it is because of taxes. Well genius...you pay taxes AFTER you have made a profit...not before. AFTER you have paid your expenses such as payroll. It is the shortage of money for business loans that is crippling our economy..not taxes. That is a direct result of the wall street and banking nosedive which almost totally ruined our economy. I bet you think that is Obamas fault. You opinion is willfully ignorant therefore useless except for the subversion it supplies to the traitorous such as yourself..

Oh ya..Go Fuck Yourself.

 

[CMike]

Obama to focus hard on economy after Democratic loss - CNN.com

"The president works each and every day on making our economy stronger and putting us in a position to where we're creating jobs, businesses are hiring again," Gibbs said. "I can certainly assure the American people that that is the chief focus of the president of the United States."


Obama is such a moron. He doesn't get it.

Every single proposal he has involves massive taxes.

Businesses are already struggeling and going bankrupt.

What does he think is going to happen when he imposes new taxes, when businesses already can't pay their current bills?

The way Obama proposes the private sector create jobs is by creating "green" jobs. However, I have yet to see any proof that there is a real demand for them, other than what Obama and his minions want.

If he truely wants to create jobs, he should immediately enact across the board tax reductions. This is how you create jobs. You give people more of their own money to help create jobs.

You are an idiot. You know little or nothing about what causes businesses to go bankrupt and fail. Listen up twit. Businesses fail because thier markets and customers dry up. They fail when they cannot finance expansion or bridge financial gaps between orders and payment for delivered goods or services. Morons like you think ...because you heard it somewhere that it is because of taxes. Well genius...you pay taxes AFTER you have made a profit...not before. AFTER you have paid your expenses such as payroll. It is the shortage of money for business loans that is crippling our economy..not taxes. That is a direct result of the wall street and banking nosedive which almost totally ruined our economy. I bet you think that is Obamas fault. You opinion is willfully ignorant therefore useless except for the subversion it supplies to the traitorous such as yourself..

Oh ya..Go Fuck Yourself.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrllCZw8jiM]YouTube - Stripes - Don't Call Me Francis[/ame]

Businesses fail when they don't have enough money to pay their expenses.

Here is a little test.

Does more taxes give businesss more money or less money?

Do more regulations give businesses more money to pay expenses or less money to pay expensees?

Do you think Obama's promises of more taxes and more regulations will be good or bad for businesses? When more businesses fail do you think it will create more or less jobs?

Do you think Obama's threats of more taxes and regulations will cause businesses to expand or to slim down?

What a bunch of idiots

 

[CMike]

And those tax increases took effect when?

You are missing the point. Businesses know that they will have to pay higher taxes. In fact, they know that they will have to pay massive new taxes under Obama.

Do you think therefore, they will make the finanical investment of hiring new people, if they don't know if they will have the money to pay their bills? Don't you think they will scale down so they they have the money for the Obama tax increases?

Businesses prepare for what they are going to absorb. If they feel that they are going to have to pay higher taxes, they will cut back. If they feel that they are going to have more money, they will spend more on investment, such as in hiring new people.

So, basically, your points are your opinion and GUESS at why this is happening. You have no fucking clue, do you? You have no facts. No data. No NOTHING to support your hyperpartisan bullshit talking points. What a fucking lying moron you are.

My points are based on reality.

The problem is that Obama has never met a payroll and has zero business experience.

 

[sboyle24]

You are missing the point. Businesses know that they will have to pay higher taxes. In fact, they know that they will have to pay massive new taxes under Obama.

Do you think therefore, they will make the finanical investment of hiring new people, if they don't know if they will have the money to pay their bills? Don't you think they will scale down so they they have the money for the Obama tax increases?

Businesses prepare for what they are going to absorb. If they feel that they are going to have to pay higher taxes, they will cut back. If they feel that they are going to have more money, they will spend more on investment, such as in hiring new people.

So, basically, your points are your opinion and GUESS at why this is happening. You have no fucking clue, do you? You have no facts. No data. No NOTHING to support your hyperpartisan bullshit talking points. What a fucking lying moron you are.

My points are based on reality.

The problem is that Obama has never met a payroll and has zero business experience.

That sounds like a hyperpartisan assumption to me. Get your head straight.

 

[CMike]

So, basically, your points are your opinion and GUESS at why this is happening. You have no fucking clue, do you? You have no facts. No data. No NOTHING to support your hyperpartisan bullshit talking points. What a fucking lying moron you are.

My points are based on reality.

The problem is that Obama has never met a payroll and has zero business experience.

That sounds like a hyperpartisan assumption to me. Get your head straight.

Okay I'll try to make it simple so perhaps a liberal can understand it.

You have a business selling stupid liberal advice.

You employ five people. You have to pay rent too.

Your expenses are $1000/month. You make $1,100/month. In fact, maybe even less.

I'll give two scenerios

1) The government raised the amount of money you have to pay the government. So instead fo $1,000, your expenses are now $1,300. However, you only make $1,100.

You then realize you must make a decision to cut expenses.

You realize that instead of five people you can now make do with 4 people. One person is laid off

2) The government is making it clear that it will raise your taxes and regulations. You have no idea what it's going to be. However, you know sound business practice is to prepare for it. You know it's going to be a lot, because the idiot-in-chief wants tax increases for almost anything he proses.

You estimate that your expenses will be $1,400. You being a sound business man, make the decision to lay off 2 people, and you know employ 3 people, instead of 5.

 

[CMike]

So, basically, your points are your opinion and GUESS at why this is happening. You have no fucking clue, do you? You have no facts. No data. No NOTHING to support your hyperpartisan bullshit talking points. What a fucking lying moron you are.

My points are based on reality.

The problem is that Obama has never met a payroll and has zero business experience.

That sounds like a hyperpartisan assumption to me. Get your head straight.

How about answering my questions?

How does taxing businesses more create jobs? How does taking more of their own money away from them not hurt jobs?

 

[sboyle24]

My points are based on reality.

The problem is that Obama has never met a payroll and has zero business experience.

That sounds like a hyperpartisan assumption to me. Get your head straight.

Okay I'll try to make it simple so perhaps a liberal can understand it.

You have a business selling stupid liberal advice.

You employ five people. You have to pay rent too.

Your expenses are $1000/month. You make $1,100/month. In fact, maybe even less.

I'll give two scenerios

1) The government raised the amount of money you have to pay the government. So instead fo $1,000, your expenses are now $1,300. However, you only make $1,100.

You then realize you must make a decision to cut expenses.

You realize that instead of five people you can now make do with 4 people. One person is laid off

2) The government is making it clear that it will raise your taxes and regulations. You have no idea what it's going to be. However, you know sound business practice is to prepare for it. You know it's going to be a lot, because the idiot-in-chief wants tax increases for almost anything he proses.

You estimate that your expenses will be $1,400. You being a sound business man, make the decision to lay off 2 people, and you know employ 3 people, instead of 5.

Thanks for rambling and wasting your own time. First, you make a new assumption in saying that the market is that simple. Second, I simply stated that you were assuming Obama has no business experience. You don't know that.

 

[sboyle24]

CMike you should change your avatar. I feel that you misrepresent America.

 

[CMike]

That sounds like a hyperpartisan assumption to me. Get your head straight.

Okay I'll try to make it simple so perhaps a liberal can understand it.

You have a business selling stupid liberal advice.

You employ five people. You have to pay rent too.

Your expenses are $1000/month. You make $1,100/month. In fact, maybe even less.

I'll give two scenerios

1) The government raised the amount of money you have to pay the government. So instead fo $1,000, your expenses are now $1,300. However, you only make $1,100.

You then realize you must make a decision to cut expenses.

You realize that instead of five people you can now make do with 4 people. One person is laid off

2) The government is making it clear that it will raise your taxes and regulations. You have no idea what it's going to be. However, you know sound business practice is to prepare for it. You know it's going to be a lot, because the idiot-in-chief wants tax increases for almost anything he proses.

You estimate that your expenses will be $1,400. You being a sound business man, make the decision to lay off 2 people, and you know employ 3 people, instead of 5.

Thanks for rambling and wasting your own time. First, you make a new assumption in saying that the market is that simple. Second, I simply stated that you were assuming Obama has no business experience. You don't know that.

Saying that jobs suffer when businesses have less money is not a new assupmtion.

What business experience does Obama have?

 

[CMike]

CMike you should change your avatar. I feel that you misrepresent America.

Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. Yours are dumber than most though.

 

[sboyle24]

Okay I'll try to make it simple so perhaps a liberal can understand it.

You have a business selling stupid liberal advice.

You employ five people. You have to pay rent too.

Your expenses are $1000/month. You make $1,100/month. In fact, maybe even less.

I'll give two scenerios

1) The government raised the amount of money you have to pay the government. So instead fo $1,000, your expenses are now $1,300. However, you only make $1,100.

You then realize you must make a decision to cut expenses.

You realize that instead of five people you can now make do with 4 people. One person is laid off

2) The government is making it clear that it will raise your taxes and regulations. You have no idea what it's going to be. However, you know sound business practice is to prepare for it. You know it's going to be a lot, because the idiot-in-chief wants tax increases for almost anything he proses.

You estimate that your expenses will be $1,400. You being a sound business man, make the decision to lay off 2 people, and you know employ 3 people, instead of 5.

Thanks for rambling and wasting your own time. First, you make a new assumption in saying that the market is that simple. Second, I simply stated that you were assuming Obama has no business experience. You don't know that.

Saying that jobs suffer when businesses have less money is not a new assupmtion.

What business experience does Obama have?

Continuing your assumption I see... Maybe business owners reduce their piglike behavior and cut their own pay, or maybe they expand to bring in more money. We both know your smart enough to understand how your assumption is both hypothetical and unspecific.

And I never stated he did have experience, and I feel it is misrepresenting him to say he has none. You don't know that.

 

[sboyle24]

CMike you should change your avatar. I feel that you misrepresent America.

Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. Yours are dumber than most though.

You sound very credible and intelligent right now.

 

[CMike]

Thanks for rambling and wasting your own time. First, you make a new assumption in saying that the market is that simple. Second, I simply stated that you were assuming Obama has no business experience. You don't know that.

Saying that jobs suffer when businesses have less money is not a new assupmtion.

What business experience does Obama have?

Continuing your assumption I see... Maybe business owners reduce their piglike behavior and cut their own pay, or maybe they expand to bring in more money. We both know your smart enough to understand how your assumption is both hypothetical and unspecific.

And I never stated he did have experience, and I feel it is misrepresenting him to say he has none. You don't know that.

Why do you assume that business owners have piglike behavior?

They are the ones who provide jobs.

Here is another test? What do you need to expand? I'll give you a hint. It rhymes with honesy.

Are you truely that much of a moron that you don't know that Obama's biography is available?

Here is his bio. Why don't you copy and paste the part where he has his vast business experience.

Barack Obama Biography - Biography.com

 

[sboyle24]

Saying that jobs suffer when businesses have less money is not a new assupmtion.

What business experience does Obama have?

Continuing your assumption I see... Maybe business owners reduce their piglike behavior and cut their own pay, or maybe they expand to bring in more money. We both know your smart enough to understand how your assumption is both hypothetical and unspecific.

And I never stated he did have experience, and I feel it is misrepresenting him to say he has none. You don't know that.

Why do you assume that business owners have piglike behavior?

They are the ones who provide jobs.

Here is another test? What do you need to expand? I'll give you a hint. It rhymes with honesy.

Are you truely that much of a moron that you don't know that Obama's biography is available?

Here is his bio. Why don't you copy and paste the part where he has his vast business experience.

Barack Obama Biography - Biography.com

You have a very offensive character.

I do make an assumption, you are correct. Though not in my intention. A hypothetical example, you see, with a bit of opinion attached.

You continue to think that I stated he has vast business experience... even though I stated it is only unfair to say he has none. It's almost as bad as the death committees lie.

There is a definition given to people who continue to think and spread a lie, such as Obama having no business experience, and care very little for knowing the truth. Ignorance

I regret to say I cannot stay around and enlighten you all evening. Please make sure your future statements are less ignorant.

 

[CMike]

Continuing your assumption I see... Maybe business owners reduce their piglike behavior and cut their own pay, or maybe they expand to bring in more money. We both know your smart enough to understand how your assumption is both hypothetical and unspecific.

And I never stated he did have experience, and I feel it is misrepresenting him to say he has none. You don't know that.

Why do you assume that business owners have piglike behavior?

They are the ones who provide jobs.

Here is another test? What do you need to expand? I'll give you a hint. It rhymes with honesy.

Are you truely that much of a moron that you don't know that Obama's biography is available?

Here is his bio. Why don't you copy and paste the part where he has his vast business experience.

Barack Obama Biography - Biography.com

You have a very offensive character.

I do make an assumption, you are correct. Though not in my intention. A hypothetical example, you see, with a bit of opinion attached.

You continue to think that I stated he has vast business experience... even though I stated it is only unfair to say he has none. It's almost as bad as the death committees lie.

There is a definition given to people who continue to think and spread a lie, such as Obama having no business experience, and care very little for knowing the truth. Ignorance

I regret to say I cannot stay around and enlighten you all evening. Please make sure your future statements are less ignorant.

I said he has no business experience. You said I am making an assumption.

The reason that it's not an assumption is because I am aware of his biography.

I even posted it.

He either has it or he hasn't. He hasn't.

If he does, you can quickly point it out from his bio.

The problem (at least one of them) with you and your fellow socialists is that in your envy and jealously of business owners, that you wish to loot, you are hurting real people, and damaging the core of the economy that creates jobs.

You are not confus, you are confused amd very .

 

[CMike]

The Small Business Outlook for 2009 - Survey Results

What Small Businesses Are Doing To Get Through The Recession

As part of the survey, we asked small and home business owners to comment on what, if anything they were doing to get through the recession. The responses varied considerably, but many indicated in one way or another that they were cutting costs and/or were trying to boost sales by discounting their products and services. Pay reductions, cutbacks on the number of hours employees work, and layoffs were cited by some business owners, and some indicated they were cutting back on marketing. One respondent said he was closing a storefront studio and moving his business into his home to cut costs. Another mentioned closing several locations of a multi-location business

...We also asked our survey takers to comment on what, if anything, the government should do to help small businesses get through the recession. A handful of the respondents indicated they thought the government should do nothing. "Leave us alone. That means don't increase anybody's taxes and quit spending money you don't have," wrote one respondent. "The government should stay out of it and everything will work itself out," wrote another.

But, the majority of business owners commenting on this question indicated that access to capital and/or tax reductions were what was most needed to help small businesses through the recession.

Here are a just a few of the comments we got about loans and access to capital:

"Require that some of the money given to shore up the banks be used to give out small business short term loans. Require the banks getting money from the government that hand out credit cards be required to reduce their credit card percentages to customers and business owners. If the fees and percentages drop, customers and business owners alike will have more liquid cash."

 

[sboyle24]

Why do you assume that business owners have piglike behavior?

They are the ones who provide jobs.

Here is another test? What do you need to expand? I'll give you a hint. It rhymes with honesy.

Are you truely that much of a moron that you don't know that Obama's biography is available?

Here is his bio. Why don't you copy and paste the part where he has his vast business experience.

Barack Obama Biography - Biography.com

You have a very offensive character.

I do make an assumption, you are correct. Though not in my intention. A hypothetical example, you see, with a bit of opinion attached.

You continue to think that I stated he has vast business experience... even though I stated it is only unfair to say he has none. It's almost as bad as the death committees lie.

There is a definition given to people who continue to think and spread a lie, such as Obama having no business experience, and care very little for knowing the truth. Ignorance

I regret to say I cannot stay around and enlighten you all evening. Please make sure your future statements are less ignorant.

I said he has no business experience. You said I am making an assumption.

The reason that it's not an assumption is because I am aware of his biography.

I even posted it.

He either has it or he hasn't. He hasn't.

If he does, you can quickly point it out from his bio.

The problem (at least one of them) with you and your fellow socialists is that in your envy and jealously of business owners, that you wish to loot, you are hurting real people, and damaging the core of the economy that creates jobs.

You are not confus, you are confused amd very .

You honestly think a biography would be that specific about his business experience? Your credibility continues to dwindle.

You continue to make assumptions, and monger fear. That is the republican way!

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Obama to focus hard on economy after Democratic loss - CNN.com

"The president works each and every day on making our economy stronger and putting us in a position to where we're creating jobs, businesses are hiring again," Gibbs said. "I can certainly assure the American people that that is the chief focus of the president of the United States."


Obama is such a moron. He doesn't get it.

Every single proposal he has involves massive taxes.

Businesses are already struggeling and going bankrupt.

What does he think is going to happen when he imposes new taxes, when businesses already can't pay their current bills?

The way Obama proposes the private sector create jobs is by creating "green" jobs. However, I have yet to see any proof that there is a real demand for them, other than what Obama and his minions want.

If he truely wants to create jobs, he should immediately enact across the board tax reductions. This is how you create jobs. You give people more of their own money to help create jobs.

Isn't this the sort of scenario we had under Bush , when we were losing an average of 770,000 jobs per month?

Dumb ass. Bush was President for 8 YEARS and the job loss only occurred in his last year after Democrats refused to fix a housing loan problem. Barney Frank was on National TV just a few weeks before the big crash telling everyone more regulation would gut the Housing Industry and that said Industry was sound and fine.

 

[Neubarth]

I keep on telling you that it does no good to keep blaming one party or the other. Both had blame in the Collapse of America. Now, both will have to work to try to salvage anything that we can to prevent lawlessness from sweeping our land.

I am beginning to think that we just have to go through the "times of troubles" without political solutions. Our politicians are just too damn stupid.

 

[CMike]

Obama to focus hard on economy after Democratic loss - CNN.com

"The president works each and every day on making our economy stronger and putting us in a position to where we're creating jobs, businesses are hiring again," Gibbs said. "I can certainly assure the American people that that is the chief focus of the president of the United States."


Obama is such a moron. He doesn't get it.

Every single proposal he has involves massive taxes.

Businesses are already struggeling and going bankrupt.

What does he think is going to happen when he imposes new taxes, when businesses already can't pay their current bills?

The way Obama proposes the private sector create jobs is by creating "green" jobs. However, I have yet to see any proof that there is a real demand for them, other than what Obama and his minions want.

If he truely wants to create jobs, he should immediately enact across the board tax reductions. This is how you create jobs. You give people more of their own money to help create jobs.

Isn't this the sort of scenario we had under Bush , when we were losing an average of 770,000 jobs per month?

Dumb ass. Bush was President for 8 YEARS and the job loss only occurred in his last year after Democrats refused to fix a housing loan problem. Barney Frank was on National TV just a few weeks before the big crash telling everyone more regulation would gut the Housing Industry and that said Industry was sound and fine.

I already posted this in another thread.

Here is a link where they have the actual text of McCain's letter in 2006 warning about what will happen with Fannie and Freddie.



McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie. What did Obama do? :: Political News and commentaries :: Hyscience

Here's what John McCain said on 25 May 2005, speaking to the Senate:

Mr. President, this week Fannie Mae's regulator reported that the company's quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were "illusions deliberately and systematically created" by the company's senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal.

The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight's report goes on to say that Fannie Mae employees deliberately and intentionally manipulated financial reports to hit earnings targets in order to trigger bonuses for senior executives. In the case of Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae's former chief executive officer, OFHEO's report shows that over half of Mr. Raines' compensation for the 6 years through 2003 was directly tied to meeting earnings targets. The report of financial misconduct at Fannie Mae echoes the deeply troubling $5 billion profit restatement at Freddie Mac.

The OFHEO report also states that Fannie Mae used its political power to lobby Congress in an effort to interfere with the regulator's examination of the company's accounting problems. This report comes some weeks after Freddie Mac paid a record $3.8 million fine in a settlement with the Federal Election Commission and restated lobbying disclosure reports from 2004 to 2005. These are entities that have demonstrated over and over again that they are deeply in need of reform.

For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac-known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs-and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO's report this week does nothing to ease these concerns. In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO's report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay.

I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.

I urge my colleagues to support swift action on this GSE reform legislation.