Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If shrinking government means we have to suffer more AIGs and Lehman Brothers because of lack of oversight, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means we have to suffer workplace safety standards that would make sweat shops look like a fine middle class job opportunity, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means the Cuyahoga River is free to burn again because burning rivers means jobs, is that a good thing?From whom? Our elected officials? Or corporate special interests?First you need to LEARN that the TEA party isn't a formal party but a movement by millions of angry American citizens tired of the yaksqueeze being spewed by the elitist Statists in the District of Criminals.
People that want thier country back.
Elected officials and special interests. all special interests not just corporate.
You shrink the size of government and the power elected officials and special interests have over us becomes diminished. Both only have power when the government is big and bloated.
The economy would take off if he did. He isn't interested in that. He is only interested in making this nation pay for what he perceives as robbing others to achieve greatness. He's on a personal vendetta to ruin us. His record shows it as does his vitriol. But what to expect from a rank amateur that got his start in politics by being a Marxist radical shit disturber community organizer like the great Jimmy Hoffa.Well, they've been telling us today that the $450 bil is already paid for.
The first question is how?
Like you said....through cuts recommended by the Super Committee.
So he robs from Peter to pay Paul again.
I have an idea. He can create jobs with just two words...
I resign.
Obama can't swing a bat like Hoffa.
If shrinking government means we have to suffer more AIGs and Lehman Brothers because of lack of oversight, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means we have to suffer workplace safety standards that would make sweat shops look like a fine middle class job opportunity, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means the Cuyahoga River is free to burn again because burning rivers means jobs, is that a good thing?From whom? Our elected officials? Or corporate special interests?
Elected officials and special interests. all special interests not just corporate.
You shrink the size of government and the power elected officials and special interests have over us becomes diminished. Both only have power when the government is big and bloated.
If shrinking government means we have to suffer more AIGs and Lehman Brothers because of lack of oversight, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means we have to suffer workplace safety standards that would make sweat shops look like a fine middle class job opportunity, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means the Cuyahoga River is free to burn again because burning rivers means jobs, is that a good thing?From whom? Our elected officials? Or corporate special interests?
Elected officials and special interests. all special interests not just corporate.
You shrink the size of government and the power elected officials and special interests have over us becomes diminished. Both only have power when the government is big and bloated.
My nephew just turned down a job at Kroger on the night shift.
"I ain't working for no less than $10 an hour"
While his condo is being foreclosed on.
"God will provide" is his response.
Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.
You'd think people would check out financial instituions for thier health/portfolio before they decide? A little education goes a long way.People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.
NO One wants this. ONLY in your mind. Stop reading talking points.Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.
No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.
Laws are only enforced if there's a cop on the beat. When you take away government oversight, you remove the cop.If shrinking government means we have to suffer more AIGs and Lehman Brothers because of lack of oversight, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means we have to suffer workplace safety standards that would make sweat shops look like a fine middle class job opportunity, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means the Cuyahoga River is free to burn again because burning rivers means jobs, is that a good thing?Elected officials and special interests. all special interests not just corporate.
You shrink the size of government and the power elected officials and special interests have over us becomes diminished. Both only have power when the government is big and bloated.
LAW will take care of the robbers. Government needs to get the hell outta the way of commerce.
Don't you think it's odd that the Government is screaming jobs, jobs, jobs...as they stand in the way because they don't trust the people?
Tell me this? Rick Perry said the SS System is a Ponzi Scheme last night (which he is correct)...Why is it that Bernie Madoff gets put in jail for a similiar scheme and our electeds get off scot-free for the same offense perpetrated on the people?
Simple. Hint: Madoff wasn't forcing it at the point of a gun.
Then what precisely does the Tea party talking point "shrink the size of government" mean? What precisely does the talking point "onerous government regulation" mean?NO One wants this. ONLY in your mind. Stop reading talking points.Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.
No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.
Laws are only enforced if there's a cop on the beat. When you take away government oversight, you remove the cop.If shrinking government means we have to suffer more AIGs and Lehman Brothers[/B] because of lack of oversight, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means we have to suffer workplace safety standards that would make sweat shops look like a fine middle class job opportunity, is that a good thing? If shrinking government means the Cuyahoga River is free to burn again because burning rivers means jobs, is that a good thing?
LAW will take care of the robbers. Government needs to get the hell outta the way of commerce.
Don't you think it's odd that the Government is screaming jobs, jobs, jobs...as they stand in the way because they don't trust the people?
Tell me this? Rick Perry said the SS System is a Ponzi Scheme last night (which he is correct)...Why is it that Bernie Madoff gets put in jail for a similiar scheme and our electeds get off scot-free for the same offense perpetrated on the people?
Simple. Hint: Madoff wasn't forcing it at the point of a gun.
Those failing banks were major contributors to Obama's campaign fund....and also got massive bailouts.Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.
No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.
Then what precisely does the Tea party talking point "shrink the size of government" mean? What precisely does the talking point "onerous government regulation" mean?NO One wants this. ONLY in your mind. Stop reading talking points.Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?
No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.
Then what precisely does the Tea party talking point "shrink the size of government" mean? What precisely does the talking point "onerous government regulation" mean?NO One wants this. ONLY in your mind. Stop reading talking points.Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?
No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.
People want responsibility TO the people...and not running roughshod over them because they think they can get away with it...(But then we get into stupid people voting without thinking).Those failing banks were major contributors to Obama's campaign fund....and also got massive bailouts.Even if those failing banks act against the law to reap profits while fudging foreclosure papers all to gain profits?People should be watching their own money, The federal government doesnt. If they put them in failing banks, then they lose their money. It sucks, but thats how it is.
No government means no protection of law. and that's anarchy. That's poisonous to society. That's what some of the extreme right want, whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.
Nobody wants an absence of government. We just want one that doesn't take advantage of us and spend our money as it pleases.
And told to go to Hell...Then what precisely does the Tea party talking point "shrink the size of government" mean? What precisely does the talking point "onerous government regulation" mean?NO One wants this. ONLY in your mind. Stop reading talking points.
It means cut spending and stop getting in the way of job creation.....and for that they're called every fucken name in the book.
