Obama Should Be applauded On The Economy

Historic profits. Part of that is due to the Chamber of Commerce, who gives to Republicans 9 to 1 over Democrats, working with China to move millions of jobs there to China. Those Bush tax cuts were well spent. Takes money to move jobs overseas. It's been such a success, Republicans are now envious and want us to be "more like China".

Another success of Obama is bringing back manufacturing to Amercia(lol).

How'd he do that?
By making it more cost-prohibitive to ship??

By pllacing some tariffs on China and some other countries plus tax breaks for business.
 
Another success of Obama is bringing back manufacturing to Amercia(lol).

How'd he do that?
By making it more cost-prohibitive to ship??

By pllacing some tariffs on China and some other countries plus tax breaks for business.


Strange that, because one of your comrades recently linked an article that asked the biggest movers why they were returning, and their number 1 reason was it's more cost effective to move their plant closer to their consumer than ship it overseas.
:eusa_eh:
 
Another success of Obama is bringing back manufacturing to Amercia(lol).

tell him to keep working on it. 23 million are still unemployed, more than before he started working on it.
And just think, Ed my boy, what could have happened if the repubs had not filibustered every jobs bill the pres pushed. Either the republican controlled congress did not bring it to the senate, or the senate filibustered it.
Try to think, ed. I know it hurts. But how does any bill get passed????? Do you think the pres can say here it is and it is law??? Yeah, you probably do. I forgot.

But, as the rest of us know, it takes congress and the senate to make and pass a bill into law. Repubs have made sure that does not happen.

How do you like the outcome?
 
And just think, Ed my boy, what could have happened if the repubs had not filibustered every jobs bill the pres pushed.


1) good excuse!! BO had a super majority. When is the last time a Democratic President had that? I guess he's just pretty ineffective as a leader.


2) a real new job comes from a real new product, and guess what, libturds in DC don't invent real new products so any so called jobs bill is just more make works socialism that hurts reall job creation. Pub actually helped BO but you lack the IQ to understand it. You do remember FDR's so called jobs bills don't you??

Here's what Henry Morgenthau, FDR's Secretary of the Treasury (the man who desperately needed the New Deal to succeed as much as Roosevelt) said about the New Deal stimulus: "We have tried spending money.We are spending more than we ever have spent before and it does not work... We have never made good on our promises...I say after eight years of this administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started... And an enormous debt to boot!"

"The New Republic"( at the time a FDR greatest supporter") noted. In June 1939, the federal public works programs still supported almost 19 million people, nearly 15% of the population" [page 313]

In fact in 1939, unemployment was at 17%, and there were 11 million additional in stimulus make work welfare jobs. Today when the population is 2.5 times greater we have only 8 million unemployed. Conclusion: legislation to make Democrats illegal
is urgently needed

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow, very slow?
 
And just think, Ed my boy, what could have happened if the repubs had not filibustered every jobs bill the pres pushed. Either the republican controlled congress did not bring it to the senate, or the senate filibustered it.
Try to think, ed. I know it hurts. But how does any bill get passed????? Do you think the pres can say here it is and it is law??? Yeah, you probably do. I forgot.

But, as the rest of us know, it takes congress and the senate to make and pass a bill into law. Repubs have made sure that does not happen.

How do you like the outcome?


Care to list them?

I can list the bills passed by the House that were killed by Reid and your Dembulb Senate, so you can peddle your bullshit elsewhere.

Oh, and, how's that BUDGET coming along, asshat?!
:eusa_hand:
STFU
 
Obama Should Be applauded On The Economy
Exactly....... It takes skill to cause Americans’ wealth to plummeted 40 percent from 2007 to 2010, as per the Federal Reserve. Not every President is capable of this type of carnage, in fact no other President even comes close.
 
And just think, Ed my boy, what could have happened if the repubs had not filibustered every jobs bill the pres pushed. Either the republican controlled congress did not bring it to the senate, or the senate filibustered it.
Try to think, ed. I know it hurts. But how does any bill get passed????? Do you think the pres can say here it is and it is law??? Yeah, you probably do. I forgot.

But, as the rest of us know, it takes congress and the senate to make and pass a bill into law. Repubs have made sure that does not happen.

How do you like the outcome?


Care to list them?

I can list the bills passed by the House that were killed by Reid and your Dembulb Senate, so you can peddle your bullshit elsewhere.

Oh, and, how's that BUDGET coming along, asshat?!
:eusa_hand:
STFU
Jesus, horty, where have you been. You seem to be the normal con mushroom. No information except what your handlers feed you.

The world has left you behind. The repubs set a new record for filibusters, for any term, in just 2 years. There are now over 350. Apparently you have not heard. And I am sure you do not want to do the 5 minutes of actual research it would take to find out what I am telling you is the gods truth.

But you should be able to list the dem filibusters with ease. There are not many of them.

Relative to the budget, it will not happen until the repubs compromise. They refuse, no budget, and dipshits like you say it is the dems fault. Dems believe wealthy need to pay their share, repubs feel that they need more cuts. Or accept the Ryan budget Rather than restore revenue, the Ryan budget is premised on the notion that high-income earners haven't gotten enough in tax cuts, I am sure you believe this, eh, clueless??
 
And just think, Ed my boy, what could have happened if the repubs had not filibustered every jobs bill the pres pushed.


1) good excuse!! BO had a super majority. When is the last time a Democratic President had that? I guess he's just pretty ineffective as a leader.


2) a real new job comes from a real new product, and guess what, libturds in DC don't invent real new products so any so called jobs bill is just more make works socialism that hurts reall job creation. Pub actually helped BO but you lack the IQ to understand it. You do remember FDR's so called jobs bills don't you??

Here's what Henry Morgenthau, FDR's Secretary of the Treasury (the man who desperately needed the New Deal to succeed as much as Roosevelt) said about the New Deal stimulus: "We have tried spending money.We are spending more than we ever have spent before and it does not work... We have never made good on our promises...I say after eight years of this administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started... And an enormous debt to boot!"

"The New Republic"( at the time a FDR greatest supporter") noted. In June 1939, the federal public works programs still supported almost 19 million people, nearly 15% of the population" [page 313]

In fact in 1939, unemployment was at 17%, and there were 11 million additional in stimulus make work welfare jobs. Today when the population is 2.5 times greater we have only 8 million unemployed. Conclusion: legislation to make Democrats illegal
is urgently needed

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow, very slow?
Yeah, ed. You must have real issues, if you look at unemployment going from about 5% to over 25% following Hoovers policies. Until just after electing Roosevelt, when he instituted stimulus spending.

But the Hoover plan IS your plan. Don't do that nasty stimulus spending, that brought the unemployment rate back down to 14% by 1937. Unfortunately, congress convinced Roosevelt to stop stimulus spending, and we dropped back into a recession. Took another year of spending to get things moving in the right direction again. And then, the greatest of all stimulus', WWII came along. You may have noticed that the country was very happy with Roosevelt, kept reelecting him until he died.

Just think, Ed. We could have had 40% unemployment with your plan. You say libs are slow, which is great praise, considering the source. Consider that two of your repub heroes presided over the two worst economic disasters in US History. The great depression of 1929, and the great recession of W in 2007 - 2008. Talk about great leadership, Ed, given more time they could have destroyed the republic.
 
Obama Should Be applauded On The Economy
Exactly....... It takes skill to cause Americans’ wealth to plummeted 40 percent from 2007 to 2010, as per the Federal Reserve. Not every President is capable of this type of carnage, in fact no other President even comes close.
Jesus, Desperado. I am embarrassed for you. Sorry you missed the fact that Obama did not assume the presidency until the end of January, 2009. And, if you have any integrity, you would admit that this was not Obama's mess. So, did you actually mean to say BUSH. Or are you just another con tool, without the integrity to admit you are wrong, very wrong.
 
Last edited:
Obama Should Be applauded On The Economy
Exactly....... It takes skill to cause Americans’ wealth to plummeted 40 percent from 2007 to 2010, as per the Federal Reserve. Not every President is capable of this type of carnage, in fact no other President even comes close.

wait a minute, FDR is still the champ. BO needs another full term of decline before he can really match FDR and become the greatest liberal hero of all.
 
Obvious friggin troll thread...why the f*ck do these dumbass threads get 1000 replies when good threads die?
This is getting old
 
We have a corporate media.

its why the republicans can have their lies about the facts reported as if they were merely the other side of the debate.


Lies are lies no matter who owns the media
 
We have a corporate media.

its why the republicans can have their lies about the facts reported as if they were merely the other side of the debate.


Lies are lies no matter who owns the media

so then what for example is the most substantive Republican lie that the media promotes?


From a libertarian perspective liberals are born lying. If honest they would say look folks we hate the basic principles of this country that were shoved down our throats by those gross freedom loving Founders.
 
Last edited:
there are tons of them.

Reagan didnt cut taxes.

The healthcare bill makes for government takeover of the system

Obama doiesnt have a birth certificate and the like
 
We have a corporate media.

its why the republicans can have their lies about the facts reported as if they were merely the other side of the debate.


Lies are lies no matter who owns the media

so then what for example is the most substantive Republican lie that the media promotes?


From a libertarian perspective liberals are born lying. If honest they would say look folks we hate the basic principles of this country that were shoved down our throats by those gross freedom loving Founders.

see you ass is full of lies right here
 
death panels.

the stimulus didnt work.


ACORN cheated in elections


a shit load of lies
 

Forum List

Back
Top