jreeves
Senior Member
- Feb 12, 2008
- 6,588
- 319
- 48
Didn't miss jack. Anti-pollution rules and local resistance didn't stop the group from securing a permit to build the refinery did it? Finding an investment group to build the refinery and securing a long term oil deal did. Besides two articles doesn't prove that the government prohibits anyone from building any more refineries. You tell me, sport, who's going to invest in a refinery when it's a volatile business and the profit-loss margins range from +1 billion to -1 billion a year??? You should go back and read the article I posted, you might learn that oil and gas are two separate industries.
It delayed construction by up to 5 years which diverts funds from the project.
I never said the oil and gas industries are one? If so, please tell me where?
Exactly. Why would big oil assume the high risks of refinement when they are already profitting tenfold from crude extraction and delivery? Alternative energy is right around the corner. 20 years from now, do you still think we'll be consuming the same amount of gas? That's a huge risk for anyone thinking about building a new refinery.
Yes let's give 300 billion to oil companies as an incentive for them to invest in refineries.
Retarded.
What kind of a self-proclaimed conservative argues in favor of government subsidies for big oil? How's about the government not invest in new refineries or bail out irresponsible homeowners.
Where the hell did I say that the US government should give money to big oil as an incentative? You really need to read my words and not restate something that I never uttered. How long has the government been developing alternative energy? Don't you think it's prudent for our government to invest money into increasing our refining capacity? Since we are going to be using fossil fuels into the foreseeable future?