Obama seeks to keep military from voting with law suits on Ohio and other states

Libtards will claim it is false because they hate the fact that libtards try to deny the military vote. They tried it in 2000 and ever since. Facts really confuse the feeble minded fools.

Notice libs are keeping quiet on this.

They know what Obama is trying to pull, and they hope peope won't notice. :eusa_shifty: :eusa_shhh:

You are not gonna see that crowd at MSNBC going batshit over this.
TM is no where to be found now that we have actual voter suppression.

Did either of you nimrods bother to read this thread and see how this issue has played out?


:lol::lol::lol:

Not that it would make any difference.
 
Yes, my home state is being sued to keep the military from voting.

Y'all DO know this is not true, right?

READ the article ...

Obama Campaign Sues to Restrict Military Voting

Typical of breitbart, they're twisting this into something its not.

What this is about is EQUAL rights as guaranteed by the Constitution.

The lawsuit seeks to give all voters EQUAL RIGHTS.

Okay, now all you rw's ignore this and keep spreading the lie.

cuz, THAT is what the rw does.
 
Libtards will claim it is false because they hate the fact that libtards try to deny the military vote. They tried it in 2000 and ever since. Facts really confuse the feeble minded fools.

You are not gonna see that crowd at MSNBC going batshit over this.
TM is no where to be found now that we have actual voter suppression.

Did either of you nimrods bother to read this thread and see how this issue has played out?


:lol::lol::lol:

Not that it would make any difference.

Yeah, you're right...silly me. :)
 
Shame on our government for trying to give people the EQUAL RIGHTS they are guaranteed in our Constitution.
 
Maybe we can get that crazy lady from the convention to splain it to us...
That blond that was wired on some good shit...
 
Yes, my home state is being sued to keep the military from voting.

Stupid liberals are always claiming that Republicans disenfranchise voters, but when it comes to disenfranchising it's always the Democrats that are behind it.

From Jim Crowe to now, DEMOCRATS are always behind the real vote disenfranchising, and we have it again with Obama!

President Barack Obama, along with many Democrats, likes to say that, while they may disagree with the GOP on many issues related to national security, they absolutely share their admiration and dedication to members of our armed forces. Obama, in particular, enjoys being seen visiting troops and having photos taken with members of our military. So, why is his campaign and the Democrat party suing to restrict their ability to vote in the upcoming election?

On July 17th, the Obama for America Campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and the Ohio Democratic Party filed suit in OH to strike down part of that state's law governing voting by members of the military. Their suit said that part of the law is "arbitrary" with "no discernible rational basis."

Currently, Ohio allows the public to vote early in-person up until the Friday before the election. Members of the military are given three extra days to do so. While the Democrats may see this as "arbitrary" and having "no discernible rational basis," I think it is entirely reasonable given the demands on servicemen and women's time and their obligations to their sworn duty.

The National Defense Committee reports:
[f]or each of the last three years, the Department of Defense’s Federal Voting Assistance Program has reported to the President and the Congress that the number one reason for military voter disenfranchisement is inadequate time to successfully vote.
If anyone proposes legislation to combat voter fraud, Democrats will loudly scream that the proposal could "disenfranchise" some voter, somewhere. We must ensure, they argue, that voting is easy and accessible to every single voter. Every voter, that is, except the men and women of our military.

Obama Campaign Sues to Restrict Military Voting

The Attorney General for the State of Ohio, Mike DeWine has already been on Fox, saying Ohio wil fight this law suit and it is OBVIOUS That this law suit is designed to keep all military votes from being counted.

It's pretty obvious why! Obama knows the military isn't behind him! And that he can't win reelection without Ohio. So, he doesn't care how obvious this move is. He will do any dirty underhanded vote disenfranchising to win Ohio.

So, you libs can scream your phony outrage about vote disenfranchising. We will all know you are phony liars because you will all be for this law suit.

Democrats! Once again, the REAL VOTE DISENFRANCHISERS!

Typical tea party sucker, you will fall for anything. Hahaha.
 
Exactly. Why is the Ohio GOP screwing with early voting? You finally asked a sensible question.

I am not going to dignify that question with a response.
It does not rise to the level of stupid.
The fact is ,these types of schemes always lead to fraud.

In other words, you have no valid response.

No, early voting does not "always lead to fraud".

Every year there is a story about errors at early voting polling places. That is fraud.
Whether deliberate or in error, any unauthorized vote cast is fraud.
I do not oppose early voting at all. I want the process to be of the highest integrity.
This is basic stuff. To vote one must register and should be required to prove their identity. Anyone who opposes that is supporting a fraudulent process.
 
The lawsuit in OH was to allow all voters the same length of time to vote as the extended period for the military. A judge ruled in favor of it. It wasn't to block military voting.
 
Sorry bout that,


1. If this election gets stolen, there will be hell to pay.
2. True story.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Is it your opinion that the winner will automatically be guilty of stealing the election?
Or do you believe that Obama is already the winner and if Romney wins, the election is assumed to have been stolen?
 
Sorry bout that,



Sorry bout that,


1. If this election gets stolen, there will be hell to pay.
2. True story.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Is it your opinion that the winner will automatically be guilty of stealing the election?
Or do you believe that Obama is already the winner and if Romney wins, the election is assumed to have been stolen?




1. I'm saying Obama is a crook, and a fraud, and he will do anything to retain power, he is from Chicago.:eusa_eh:
2. Do I need to say more?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Shame on our government for trying to give people the EQUAL RIGHTS they are guaranteed in our Constitution.

What equal rights are those.

Read courseofhistory's post just above. Pay extra close attention to wher he/she writes,

The lawsuit in OH was to allow all voters the same length of time to vote as the extended period for the military. A judge ruled in favor of it. It wasn't to block military voting.

There it is.

GET IT?
 
Yes, my home state is being sued to keep the military from voting.

Stupid liberals are always claiming that Republicans disenfranchise voters, but when it comes to disenfranchising it's always the Democrats that are behind it.

From Jim Crowe to now, DEMOCRATS are always behind the real vote disenfranchising, and we have it again with Obama!

President Barack Obama, along with many Democrats, likes to say that, while they may disagree with the GOP on many issues related to national security, they absolutely share their admiration and dedication to members of our armed forces. Obama, in particular, enjoys being seen visiting troops and having photos taken with members of our military. So, why is his campaign and the Democrat party suing to restrict their ability to vote in the upcoming election?

On July 17th, the Obama for America Campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and the Ohio Democratic Party filed suit in OH to strike down part of that state's law governing voting by members of the military. Their suit said that part of the law is "arbitrary" with "no discernible rational basis."

Currently, Ohio allows the public to vote early in-person up until the Friday before the election. Members of the military are given three extra days to do so. While the Democrats may see this as "arbitrary" and having "no discernible rational basis," I think it is entirely reasonable given the demands on servicemen and women's time and their obligations to their sworn duty.

The National Defense Committee reports:
[f]or each of the last three years, the Department of Defense’s Federal Voting Assistance Program has reported to the President and the Congress that the number one reason for military voter disenfranchisement is inadequate time to successfully vote.
If anyone proposes legislation to combat voter fraud, Democrats will loudly scream that the proposal could "disenfranchise" some voter, somewhere. We must ensure, they argue, that voting is easy and accessible to every single voter. Every voter, that is, except the men and women of our military.
Obama Campaign Sues to Restrict Military Voting

The Attorney General for the State of Ohio, Mike DeWine has already been on Fox, saying Ohio wil fight this law suit and it is OBVIOUS That this law suit is designed to keep all military votes from being counted.

It's pretty obvious why! Obama knows the military isn't behind him! And that he can't win reelection without Ohio. So, he doesn't care how obvious this move is. He will do any dirty underhanded vote disenfranchising to win Ohio.

So, you libs can scream your phony outrage about vote disenfranchising. We will all know you are phony liars because you will all be for this law suit.

Democrats! Once again, the REAL VOTE DISENFRANCHISERS!
Disgusting.
 
Sorry bout that,

Sorry bout that,

1. If this election gets stolen, there will be hell to pay.
2. True story.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Is it your opinion that the winner will automatically be guilty of stealing the election?
Or do you believe that Obama is already the winner and if Romney wins, the election is assumed to have been stolen?

1. I'm saying Obama is a crook, and a fraud, and he will do anything to retain power, he is from Chicago.:eusa_eh:
2. Do I need to say more?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
There are more good men from Chicago than bad, SirJamesofTexas. I know. I married the best one. :)
 
Yes, my home state is being sued to keep the military from voting.

Stupid liberals are always claiming that Republicans disenfranchise voters, but when it comes to disenfranchising it's always the Democrats that are behind it.

From Jim Crowe to now, DEMOCRATS are always behind the real vote disenfranchising, and we have it again with Obama!

President Barack Obama, along with many Democrats, likes to say that, while they may disagree with the GOP on many issues related to national security, they absolutely share their admiration and dedication to members of our armed forces. Obama, in particular, enjoys being seen visiting troops and having photos taken with members of our military. So, why is his campaign and the Democrat party suing to restrict their ability to vote in the upcoming election?

On July 17th, the Obama for America Campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and the Ohio Democratic Party filed suit in OH to strike down part of that state's law governing voting by members of the military. Their suit said that part of the law is "arbitrary" with "no discernible rational basis."

Currently, Ohio allows the public to vote early in-person up until the Friday before the election. Members of the military are given three extra days to do so. While the Democrats may see this as "arbitrary" and having "no discernible rational basis," I think it is entirely reasonable given the demands on servicemen and women's time and their obligations to their sworn duty.

The National Defense Committee reports:
[f]or each of the last three years, the Department of Defense’s Federal Voting Assistance Program has reported to the President and the Congress that the number one reason for military voter disenfranchisement is inadequate time to successfully vote.
If anyone proposes legislation to combat voter fraud, Democrats will loudly scream that the proposal could "disenfranchise" some voter, somewhere. We must ensure, they argue, that voting is easy and accessible to every single voter. Every voter, that is, except the men and women of our military.
Obama Campaign Sues to Restrict Military Voting

The Attorney General for the State of Ohio, Mike DeWine has already been on Fox, saying Ohio wil fight this law suit and it is OBVIOUS That this law suit is designed to keep all military votes from being counted.

It's pretty obvious why! Obama knows the military isn't behind him! And that he can't win reelection without Ohio. So, he doesn't care how obvious this move is. He will do any dirty underhanded vote disenfranchising to win Ohio.

So, you libs can scream your phony outrage about vote disenfranchising. We will all know you are phony liars because you will all be for this law suit.

Democrats! Once again, the REAL VOTE DISENFRANCHISERS!
Disgusting.

Oh great.

Another rw who didn't read or pay attention to what was written and instead, chooses to believe the brietbart lie.

In short, this lawsuit is to give EQUAL RIGHTS, as guaranteed by our Constitution. It is NOT to stop military from voting.

Please ... Please read the article BEFORE you post.

Thanks.
 
Yes, my home state is being sued to keep the military from voting.

Stupid liberals are always claiming that Republicans disenfranchise voters, but when it comes to disenfranchising it's always the Democrats that are behind it.

From Jim Crowe to now, DEMOCRATS are always behind the real vote disenfranchising, and we have it again with Obama!

President Barack Obama, along with many Democrats, likes to say that, while they may disagree with the GOP on many issues related to national security, they absolutely share their admiration and dedication to members of our armed forces. Obama, in particular, enjoys being seen visiting troops and having photos taken with members of our military. So, why is his campaign and the Democrat party suing to restrict their ability to vote in the upcoming election?

On July 17th, the Obama for America Campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and the Ohio Democratic Party filed suit in OH to strike down part of that state's law governing voting by members of the military. Their suit said that part of the law is "arbitrary" with "no discernible rational basis."

Currently, Ohio allows the public to vote early in-person up until the Friday before the election. Members of the military are given three extra days to do so. While the Democrats may see this as "arbitrary" and having "no discernible rational basis," I think it is entirely reasonable given the demands on servicemen and women's time and their obligations to their sworn duty.

The National Defense Committee reports:
[f]or each of the last three years, the Department of Defense’s Federal Voting Assistance Program has reported to the President and the Congress that the number one reason for military voter disenfranchisement is inadequate time to successfully vote.
If anyone proposes legislation to combat voter fraud, Democrats will loudly scream that the proposal could "disenfranchise" some voter, somewhere. We must ensure, they argue, that voting is easy and accessible to every single voter. Every voter, that is, except the men and women of our military.
Obama Campaign Sues to Restrict Military Voting

The Attorney General for the State of Ohio, Mike DeWine has already been on Fox, saying Ohio wil fight this law suit and it is OBVIOUS That this law suit is designed to keep all military votes from being counted.

It's pretty obvious why! Obama knows the military isn't behind him! And that he can't win reelection without Ohio. So, he doesn't care how obvious this move is. He will do any dirty underhanded vote disenfranchising to win Ohio.

So, you libs can scream your phony outrage about vote disenfranchising. We will all know you are phony liars because you will all be for this law suit.

Democrats! Once again, the REAL VOTE DISENFRANCHISERS!
Disgusting.

What's disgusting is your inability to comprehend or tell the truth.
 

Forum List

Back
Top