Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
For 280 consecutive months before President Obama took office a span of more than 23 years the portion of Americans who were employed always exceeded 60.0 percent (according to official tallies from the Bureau of Labor Statistics). In marked contrast, last Fridays jobs numbers show that, under Obama, the portion of Americans who are employed has remained below 60.0 percent for 40 consecutive months.
In other words, when Obama took office, America had a streak going of 280 straight months in which at least 60.0 percent of Americans were employed. Under Obama, that streak was broken and a new one has begun: 40 straight months in which fewer than 60.0 percent of Americans are employed. ...........
An employment rate below 59.0 percent may appear to be the new norm under Obamacare. But it wasnt always this way. In fact, pre-Obama, the last time the employment rate didnt exceed 59.0 percent was in January 1984 more than 28 years ago.
I await the libtard spin on how wonderful this is.
I await the libtard spin on how wonderful this is.
The liberal response is so predicatable. It's Bush's fault and we'd be worse off if not for Obama spending trillions to shore up the union coffers and repay his contributors. Welfare is good for the economy and that's why the rolls have doubled since Obama took office. It's the rich people's faults. It's big business who are scared of Obama policies and won't hire more people.
A CEO making a million a year is greedy, according to a liberal talking head who makes $14 million a year.
Hard to follow their logic, but helps if you chug the koolaid.
But, but Obama promised there would be jobs! Shovel ready jobs! Remember the stimulus? He promised us, too that the deficit would be cut by 50%! And he meant it! There was going to be Change... Hope and Change! ...And there were going to be jobs...lots of jobs, and....
I await the libtard spin on how wonderful this is.
The liberal response is so predicatable. It's Bush's fault and we'd be worse off if not for Obama spending trillions to shore up the union coffers and repay his contributors. Welfare is good for the economy and that's why the rolls have doubled since Obama took office. It's the rich people's faults. It's big business who are scared of Obama policies and won't hire more people.
A CEO making a million a year is greedy, according to a liberal talking head who makes $14 million a year.
Hard to follow their logic, but helps if you chug the koolaid.
Employment rate below 60 percent for 40 consecutive months!! Yea, his policies have us going in the right direction.
For 280 consecutive months before President Obama took office a span of more than 23 years the portion of Americans who were employed always exceeded 60.0 percent (according to official tallies from the Bureau of Labor Statistics). In marked contrast, last Fridays jobs numbers show that, under Obama, the portion of Americans who are employed has remained below 60.0 percent for 40 consecutive months.
In other words, when Obama took office, America had a streak going of 280 straight months in which at least 60.0 percent of Americans were employed. Under Obama, that streak was broken and a new one has begun: 40 straight months in which fewer than 60.0 percent of Americans are employed. ...........
An employment rate below 59.0 percent may appear to be the new norm under Obamacare. But it wasnt always this way. In fact, pre-Obama, the last time the employment rate didnt exceed 59.0 percent was in January 1984 more than 28 years ago.
Employment Rate Below 60.0 Percent for 40 Consecutive Months | The Weekly Standard
I await the libtard spin on how wonderful this is.
The liberal response is so predicatable. It's Bush's fault and we'd be worse off if not for Obama spending trillions to shore up the union coffers and repay his contributors. Welfare is good for the economy and that's why the rolls have doubled since Obama took office. It's the rich people's faults. It's big business who are scared of Obama policies and won't hire more people.
A CEO making a million a year is greedy, according to a liberal talking head who makes $14 million a year.
Hard to follow their logic, but helps if you chug the koolaid.
I await the libtard spin on how wonderful this is.
The liberal response is so predicatable. It's Bush's fault and we'd be worse off if not for Obama spending trillions to shore up the union coffers and repay his contributors. Welfare is good for the economy and that's why the rolls have doubled since Obama took office. It's the rich people's faults. It's big business who are scared of Obama policies and won't hire more people.
A CEO making a million a year is greedy, according to a liberal talking head who makes $14 million a year.
Hard to follow their logic, but helps if you chug the koolaid.
What's with the avatar Clementine?
Have you got something against feeding poor people?
I await the libtard spin on how wonderful this is.
The liberal response is so predicatable. It's Bush's fault and we'd be worse off if not for Obama spending trillions to shore up the union coffers and repay his contributors. Welfare is good for the economy and that's why the rolls have doubled since Obama took office. It's the rich people's faults. It's big business who are scared of Obama policies and won't hire more people.
A CEO making a million a year is greedy, according to a liberal talking head who makes $14 million a year.
Hard to follow their logic, but helps if you chug the koolaid.
What's with the avatar Clementine?
Have you got something against feeding poor people?
I would suspect Clementine is against feeding the poor, if they are the wrong color, or if they are Gay, or if they are Asian, or if they are Muslim, or if they are Black...just a guess
How dumb can you get, hater dupes. Most disgraceful, hypocritical, propagandizing opposition ever. Total paralysis since stimulus ran out, 2/2010. This is the Pub congress economy....
And thanks for the depression, the stupidest wars ever, and 9/11. Nothing but greed, cronyism, and incompetence. See sig for some facts...not hate/spin. Pub dupes!!
How dumb can you get, hater dupes. Most disgraceful, hypocritical, propagandizing opposition ever. Total paralysis since stimulus ran out, 2/2010. This is the Pub congress economy....
And thanks for the depression, the stupidest wars ever, and 9/11. Nothing but greed, cronyism, and incompetence. See sig for some facts...not hate/spin. Pub dupes!!
Obongo is president, that's where the buck stops pal.
Employment rate below 60 percent for 40 consecutive months!! Yea, his policies have us going in the right direction.
For 280 consecutive months before President Obama took office a span of more than 23 years the portion of Americans who were employed always exceeded 60.0 percent (according to official tallies from the Bureau of Labor Statistics). In marked contrast, last Fridays jobs numbers show that, under Obama, the portion of Americans who are employed has remained below 60.0 percent for 40 consecutive months.
In other words, when Obama took office, America had a streak going of 280 straight months in which at least 60.0 percent of Americans were employed. Under Obama, that streak was broken and a new one has begun: 40 straight months in which fewer than 60.0 percent of Americans are employed. ...........
An employment rate below 59.0 percent may appear to be the new norm under Obamacare. But it wasnt always this way. In fact, pre-Obama, the last time the employment rate didnt exceed 59.0 percent was in January 1984 more than 28 years ago.
Employment Rate Below 60.0 Percent for 40 Consecutive Months | The Weekly Standard
