- May 20, 2009
- 144,087
- 66,361
- 2,330
None of the Kool Aid Snorters can defend this, they're out looking at the Palin Speaking Contract with CSU Stanislaus that someone left in the garbage.
LOL
LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Can anyone show me where in the U.S. Constitution it says that the U.S. has to be a empire?
Did any of they founding Fathers every say that their goal was for the U.S. to be a World Super Power?
Our stature as a world super power happened as a result of WWII - more of an accident than by design. Once we were in that position, we had to act responsibly.
However, there is no mandate for us to be the world's dominant power.
The only real justification is that if we are not a world dominant power, that means that some other country will dominate us.
The true basis for the continued insistence that we be the world's single dominant power is just the instinctual nature of the wingnuts - they like so many civilizations before that are preprogrammed to dominate - like every other sleazy empire that has every existed. The wingnuts would have us be no different than the Romans.
Questioning the need for us to be a world superpower is the only intelligent thing to do. In fact, the true tradition of America is to be isolationist, not an empire.
Sure sounds like he's sorry about the whole thing. Good thing he is doing his darndest to reduce us to a non-dominant superpower status. Makes everything so much easier, dontachaknow?
Did you guys even fucking watch the video?
Are you honestly telling me you LIKE being pulled into Israel's bullshit? That you ENJOY having to intervene on Georgia's behalf? Bullshit.
You all know NOTHING about our countriesI know it is "about our country's as in possessive, and that countries is for the plural of country.. that's about all I know.. see? foundations, nothing about the true american dream. You're stupid ass "force for good" ideas come from that dumbass Wilson, not from our founding fathers. Jefferson and many of our other founders believed we were an exceptional nation and a beacon for the rest of the world. They designed our government to NOT intervene or half to be intervened for. They didn't believe in going out and showing off our morals, to push the world where it needed to be.
The Jeffersonian model was to aggrandize our wealth and liberty domestically, and project that power to the world and allow them to adopt it. Not to force empire upon other people, that's what they wanted to escape. On top of that, once you become an empire, they knew the only place from there was down, which is why they avoided massive land grabbing campaigns and expantionist policies beyond Manifest Destiny.
It's only after this asshole Wilson had to come about that these stupid fucking ideas of a benevelont hegemony of democratic states using their morals as a force for good to make the world a better place got popular. The world isn't peaches and creams, there is no GOOD or EVIL, just the weak and the strong. If we want to maintain our great standard of living and protect our security, becoming an empire is the LAST thing we should want, nor should we want to get overstretched in other people's affairs.
It's so funny to see you conservatives defending such a stupid ideal proposed by a Democrat.
Did you guys even fucking watch the video?
Are you honestly telling me you LIKE being pulled into Israel's bullshit? That you ENJOY having to intervene on Georgia's behalf? Bullshit.
You all know NOTHING about our countriesI know it is "about our country's as in possessive, and that countries is for the plural of country.. that's about all I know.. see? foundations, nothing about the true american dream. You're stupid ass "force for good" ideas come from that dumbass Wilson, not from our founding fathers. Jefferson and many of our other founders believed we were an exceptional nation and a beacon for the rest of the world. They designed our government to NOT intervene or half to be intervened for. They didn't believe in going out and showing off our morals, to push the world where it needed to be.
The Jeffersonian model was to aggrandize our wealth and liberty domestically, and project that power to the world and allow them to adopt it. Not to force empire upon other people, that's what they wanted to escape. On top of that, once you become an empire, they knew the only place from there was down, which is why they avoided massive land grabbing campaigns and expantionist policies beyond Manifest Destiny.
It's only after this asshole Wilson had to come about that these stupid fucking ideas of a benevelont hegemony of democratic states using their morals as a force for good to make the world a better place got popular. The world isn't peaches and creams, there is no GOOD or EVIL, just the weak and the strong. If we want to maintain our great standard of living and protect our security, becoming an empire is the LAST thing we should want, nor should we want to get overstretched in other people's affairs.
It's so funny to see you conservatives defending such a stupid ideal proposed by a Democrat.
Did you guys even fucking watch the video?
Are you honestly telling me you LIKE being pulled into Israel's bullshit? That you ENJOY having to intervene on Georgia's behalf? Bullshit.
You all know NOTHING about our countriesI know it is "about our country's as in possessive, and that countries is for the plural of country.. that's about all I know.. see? foundations, nothing about the true american dream. You're stupid ass "force for good" ideas come from that dumbass Wilson, not from our founding fathers. Jefferson and many of our other founders believed we were an exceptional nation and a beacon for the rest of the world. They designed our government to NOT intervene or half to be intervened for. They didn't believe in going out and showing off our morals, to push the world where it needed to be.
The Jeffersonian model was to aggrandize our wealth and liberty domestically, and project that power to the world and allow them to adopt it. Not to force empire upon other people, that's what they wanted to escape. On top of that, once you become an empire, they knew the only place from there was down, which is why they avoided massive land grabbing campaigns and expantionist policies beyond Manifest Destiny.
It's only after this asshole Wilson had to come about that these stupid fucking ideas of a benevelont hegemony of democratic states using their morals as a force for good to make the world a better place got popular. The world isn't peaches and creams, there is no GOOD or EVIL, just the weak and the strong. If we want to maintain our great standard of living and protect our security, becoming an empire is the LAST thing we should want, nor should we want to get overstretched in other people's affairs.
It's so funny to see you conservatives defending such a stupid ideal proposed by a Democrat.
Eh, grammar nazi's be grammar nazi's . Long diatribes full of seething rage should be typo free, but its better to leave them in. That way when the asshat that can't respond with anything reads it, he'll feel like he won by pointing out the grammar flaws.
Can anyone show me where in the U.S. Constitution it says that the U.S. has to be a empire?
Did any of they founding Fathers every say that their goal was for the U.S. to be a World Super Power?
Our stature as a world super power happened as a result of WWII - more of an accident than by design. Once we were in that position, we had to act responsibly.
However, there is no mandate for us to be the world's dominant power.
The only real justification is that if we are not a world dominant power, that means that some other country will dominate us.
The true basis for the continued insistence that we be the world's single dominant power is just the instinctual nature of the wingnuts - they like so many civilizations before that are preprogrammed to dominate - like every other sleazy empire that has every existed. The wingnuts would have us be no different than the Romans.
Questioning the need for us to be a world superpower is the only intelligent thing to do. In fact, the true tradition of America is to be isolationist, not an empire.
From January 2009 until about August 2009 this clown we have as a president shocked and suprised me week after week with his actions and statements.
From January 2009 until about August 2009 this clown we have as a president shocked and suprised me week after week with his actions and statements.
Uh... to which clown are you referring? The Brown Clown, perhaps?
He's not shocked me... He's doing precisely what one should expect from a clown of the Marxist Muslim variety. Right down the middle...
Can anyone show me where in the U.S. Constitution it says that the U.S. has to be a empire?
Did any of they founding Fathers every say that their goal was for the U.S. to be a World Super Power?
Our stature as a world super power happened as a result of WWII - more of an accident than by design. Once we were in that position, we had to act responsibly.
However, there is no mandate for us to be the world's dominant power.
The only real justification is that if we are not a world dominant power, that means that some other country will dominate us.
The true basis for the continued insistence that we be the world's single dominant power is just the instinctual nature of the wingnuts - they like so many civilizations before that are preprogrammed to dominate - like every other sleazy empire that has every existed. The wingnuts would have us be no different than the Romans.
Questioning the need for us to be a world superpower is the only intelligent thing to do. In fact, the true tradition of America is to be isolationist, not an empire.
We dont have to be, but we became one because of the greatness of this country. We were so successful, that we blossomed into the most powerful nation the world has ever known. Along with that, of course, comes a big ass bulls-eye. Just like in sports. We are the Yankees of baseball, in a global political analogy. People are going to hate us just for being richer, better fed, happier, ect. Along with our success comes military power. And that military power often must fend off evil. Evil against us, but also evil against allies.....because allowing evil to spread and conquer allies will like cancer eventually get to us.
Whether We Like it Or Not, We Remain a Dominant Military Superpower"
now for the rest of the quote...
and when conflicts break out, we get pulled into them
So the whether we like it or not refers to our being pulled into global conflicts because of our superpower status
Whether We Like it Or Not, We Remain a Dominant Military Superpower"
now for the rest of the quote...
and when conflicts break out, we get pulled into them
So the whether we like it or not refers to our being pulled into global conflicts because of our superpower status
I like having sex with small children and farm animals and when conflicts break out, we get pulled into them...
yeah, I don't see any problem once you add the modifier...outstanding work as usual Ricki Retardo