Obama offered a deal to cut 4 trillion off of the deficit and the Republicans...

Been drinking the cool aide ain't ya Billy?

Obama ain't offered SHIT! He...has been missing in action through this whole thing. As a matter of fact, the FIRST thing he did when he came back to town was to give companies ANOTHER tax loop hole...you know, like the ones he CLAIMS he wants to close...only this one is so magnanimous that he thinks we won't call it what it is. See, it's a TAX BREAK to companies and corporations that hire vets.

Take THAT occupy wall street!

Ain't that wonderful of the man? Set up a system to fail so that it cuts the defense budget in half, puts thousands of soldiers in harm's way without the equipment they need and then give corporations tax breaks to hire them when they come back in wheel chairs and on crutches. Wonderful man ain't he?

This is EXACTLY what Obummer and the democrats WANTED to happen with that stupid super committee crap in exchange for raising the debt ceiling in the first place. If you doubt it, just look at the ideologues they put on the thing.

The only mistake the republicans made was in voting to raise the debt ceiling in exchange for anything short of repealing Obamacare and passing the Ryan budget that actually would have cut 4 TRILLION out of the budget.

This president and the democrat party has not only not passed, but has not even OFFERED A BUDGET since Obama took office...little on offered some grand deficit reduction scheme.

Something that I might add has NEVER HAPPENED before in the history of this country and they damn well could have done since they controlled BOTH HOUSES of Congress for the first 2 years Obama has been in office. 900+ days with out a budget and in contempt of the Constitution.

By the way, the TRUTH of the super committee negotiations is that the democrats didn't off ONE SINGLE PLAN. The republicans offered several and the last one that the democrats rejected out of hand actually included closing the tax loop holds you mistakenly seem to think the democrats want. However, as I said, they rejected it out of hand.

They really only want to SAY they want to close the loop holes. They don't want to get caught actually doing it by their corporate masters and fat cat donors!

What put the troops in "harm's way" was invading Iraq for oil..and nation building in Afghanistan. Done right..there would have been no or little loss of life and the whole war on terror would have been over in several weeks..with Osama Bin Laden dead and buried.

Instead what we got was a big fucking mess. Thanks to bozos like Bush and Rumsfeld.

Exactly. I can't believe that any wingnuts would have the balls to bring up anything to do with "putting troops in harms way" after their support of the Iraq invasion and occupation.

I have and do support going into Afghanistan after Bin Laden however and so did Bush at first. But then later he said "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."

like Libya?
 
Can you post this "torn-up bill" for us to see?

stock-photo-1486747-isolated-heap-of-shredded-paper.jpg
 
Been drinking the cool aide ain't ya Billy?

Obama ain't offered SHIT! He...has been missing in action through this whole thing. As a matter of fact, the FIRST thing he did when he came back to town was to give companies ANOTHER tax loop hole...you know, like the ones he CLAIMS he wants to close...only this one is so magnanimous that he thinks we won't call it what it is. See, it's a TAX BREAK to companies and corporations that hire vets.

Take THAT occupy wall street!

Ain't that wonderful of the man? Set up a system to fail so that it cuts the defense budget in half, puts thousands of soldiers in harm's way without the equipment they need and then give corporations tax breaks to hire them when they come back in wheel chairs and on crutches. Wonderful man ain't he?

This is EXACTLY what Obummer and the democrats WANTED to happen with that stupid super committee crap in exchange for raising the debt ceiling in the first place. If you doubt it, just look at the ideologues they put on the thing.

The only mistake the republicans made was in voting to raise the debt ceiling in exchange for anything short of repealing Obamacare and passing the Ryan budget that actually would have cut 4 TRILLION out of the budget.

This president and the democrat party has not only not passed, but has not even OFFERED A BUDGET since Obama took office...little on offered some grand deficit reduction scheme.

Something that I might add has NEVER HAPPENED before in the history of this country and they damn well could have done since they controlled BOTH HOUSES of Congress for the first 2 years Obama has been in office. 900+ days with out a budget and in contempt of the Constitution.

By the way, the TRUTH of the super committee negotiations is that the democrats didn't off ONE SINGLE PLAN. The republicans offered several and the last one that the democrats rejected out of hand actually included closing the tax loop holds you mistakenly seem to think the democrats want. However, as I said, they rejected it out of hand.

They really only want to SAY they want to close the loop holes. They don't want to get caught actually doing it by their corporate masters and fat cat donors!

Obummer.

I really am fascinated by all these whimsical nicknames thrown out by individuals such as this. I really should catalogue them, just so I can provide at a moment's notice a reference to all the 'sage' things they come up with.

I notice it just as much on these forums as I do anywhere else on the internet. It's in the DNA.
 
Been drinking the cool aide ain't ya Billy?

Obama ain't offered SHIT! He...has been missing in action through this whole thing. As a matter of fact, the FIRST thing he did when he came back to town was to give companies ANOTHER tax loop hole...you know, like the ones he CLAIMS he wants to close...only this one is so magnanimous that he thinks we won't call it what it is. See, it's a TAX BREAK to companies and corporations that hire vets.

Take THAT occupy wall street!

Ain't that wonderful of the man? Set up a system to fail so that it cuts the defense budget in half, puts thousands of soldiers in harm's way without the equipment they need and then give corporations tax breaks to hire them when they come back in wheel chairs and on crutches. Wonderful man ain't he?

This is EXACTLY what Obummer and the democrats WANTED to happen with that stupid super committee crap in exchange for raising the debt ceiling in the first place. If you doubt it, just look at the ideologues they put on the thing.

The only mistake the republicans made was in voting to raise the debt ceiling in exchange for anything short of repealing Obamacare and passing the Ryan budget that actually would have cut 4 TRILLION out of the budget.

This president and the democrat party has not only not passed, but has not even OFFERED A BUDGET since Obama took office...little on offered some grand deficit reduction scheme.

Something that I might add has NEVER HAPPENED before in the history of this country and they damn well could have done since they controlled BOTH HOUSES of Congress for the first 2 years Obama has been in office. 900+ days with out a budget and in contempt of the Constitution.

By the way, the TRUTH of the super committee negotiations is that the democrats didn't off ONE SINGLE PLAN. The republicans offered several and the last one that the democrats rejected out of hand actually included closing the tax loop holds you mistakenly seem to think the democrats want. However, as I said, they rejected it out of hand.

They really only want to SAY they want to close the loop holes. They don't want to get caught actually doing it by their corporate masters and fat cat donors!

Obummer.

I really am fascinated by all these whimsical nicknames thrown out by individuals such as this. I really should catalogue them, just so I can provide at a moment's notice a reference to all the 'sage' things they come up with.

I notice it just as much on these forums as I do anywhere else on the internet. It's in the DNA.

Childish name calling appeals to children.
 
Should I call him by his given name. You know...the one he was given out of deference for a family hero. You know the one I mean. The guy that was pulled out of a RAT HOLE in Iraq. Hussein!

The only CHILDREN on these forums are those who believe the fairy tales told by the progressive propaganda machine!

Grow up, open your eyes and YOU may find some inventive new names to describe this band of progressive/socialist/Marxist/communist putzes that have banned together in a common interest of destroying the United States!

As to OBUMMER'S offering deficit reduction...and just for the mathematically challenged. INCREASING SPENDING IS NOT CUTTING. Stealing more than you spend is NOT debt reduction. It's STEALING!

To claim that slowing the speed at which spending increases in relation to revenue increases is somehow a debt or deficit reduction is an out right LIE...a fairy tail told to CHILDREN!!!
 
Obama offered a deal to cut 4 trillion off of the deficit and the Republicans...


Couldn't give him an answer before he changed the deal and the goalposts.
 
...still tore up the deal. Why? Because it included taxing the wealthy. It's absolutely ridiculous. Fox News/Republicans are always touting that taxing the wealthy wouldn't make a big dent in the deficit, which is true. However, just because it's a small dent, it doesn't mean that it shouldn't be included in the proposal. The tax hikes on the rich that Obama proposed would have reduced the deficit by 300 billion dollars. As small as that amount is toward reducing the deficit, isn't it a good compromise on the issue of taxes considering that the proposal totalled 4 trillion all together in cuts?

Can the rich really not handle being slightly less rich than they could be for the sake of getting the country back on track?

Now, all we have to show for it is 1.2 trillion in automatic cuts.

You don't understand how government works do you??

First off "Obama was offered a deal" By whom you say??

Not to mention there is no way in fucking hell the House could even convince the Senate to cut 4 trillion... 4 trillion is a huge number and would be progressive over 50 or so years..

The democrats in the Senate and the republicans in the House fight over millions, let alone billions or trillions :lol:

Amazing...

The way it works is Obama demands Congress do what he says and the democratic Senate nods their heads like a bunch of bobble heads and then the republican House tells them to fuck off.

That's politics today..
 
Should I call him by his given name. You know...the one he was given out of deference for a family hero. You know the one I mean. The guy that was pulled out of a RAT HOLE in Iraq. Hussein!

The only CHILDREN on these forums are those who believe the fairy tales told by the progressive propaganda machine!

Grow up, open your eyes and YOU may find some inventive new names to describe this band of progressive/socialist/Marxist/communist putzes that have banned together in a common interest of destroying the United States!

As to OBUMMER'S offering deficit reduction...and just for the mathematically challenged. INCREASING SPENDING IS NOT CUTTING. Stealing more than you spend is NOT debt reduction. It's STEALING!

To claim that slowing the speed at which spending increases in relation to revenue increases is somehow a debt or deficit reduction is an out right LIE...a fairy tail told to CHILDREN!!!

It's kind of weird that you'd want to call him by his middle name. Do you typically call other people by their middle name?

The only reason your side does it is because you try to evoke racist emotions out of constituents. There's certainly a lot of fear out there regarding dark skinned Arabs and Persians who follow a different yet nearly Biblically identical god.

There's nothing wrong with the name Hussein. It means 'good', 'handsome' or 'beautiful' according to wikipedia.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top