Obama No Longer In Drag On The Economy(?)!

[mascale]

Democrats are no longer stuck in the mud due to Obama-Biden. CBS-NY Times polling ended 9/12 finds Obama better regarded better able to handle the economy among all potential voters, and even leading by a point among likely voters.

See page 20 in the actual results, if the linky-thingy goes near there.

Latest New York Times/CBS News Poll - Document - NYTimes.com

Only apparently better able is Romney to do something about the relatively insignifcant federal deficit--$16.0 tril. of $55.0 tril. of the Total Credit Market.

Mostly, since no one discusses the "new money" of modern markets, which is the credit market: Then someone needs mainly to ask, "Who is better able to meet the credit obligations of the United States? Is the vomit-sucking, pig disemboweling, all around credit market unfriendly Romney better able to meet the credit obligations of the United States? Is World-Class, Default-Avoiding, Free World Leader Obama better able to meet the credit obligations of the United States?

No one anywhere, of course, discusses the "new money" of modern markets. Clearly, economists do not discuss the "new money" of modern markets. Clearly, Nobel Laureates do not discuss the "new money" of modern markets. Clearly the Tea Party does not discuss the "new money" of modern markets. Rep. Ryan is all about taking spending customers out of all the stores. Clearly, Repl. Ryan does not discuss the 'new money" of modern markets. The Romneys took one look at the "new money" of market economes: And decided to spread none of it around. They hoard it.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Great Chairman Bernanke now accepts even mortages as "new money" of market economies(?)! Anyone hopes to be able to ask, "What does he know, and when did he know it?! With credit, you meet its terms, or die!)

 

[Mr. H.]

Oh yes he is...

 

[mascale]

Whereas Bain Capital, of the Ivy League brand, would take what money there was--and invest it among the already prosperous--and Whereas State and Local government , of the Ivy League brand, took what Stimulus money for them that there was, and spread amongst themselves--already properous: Not even a real Queen would do that, anymore. The real Queen of England even consented to be taxed! Even the Real Queens have changed(?)!

In Matthew 25:14-30, the servant provided the one talent clearly notes that putting the money to the exchangers leaves that servant left out. There is no way that anything near what the other two can bring in can happen: In that system.

Foreclosure even happens--of a sort. Foolish people do create systems like that--Christian, or Communist, or Socialist, or Jihadist, or Monarchy, or aristocracy--or any of the other epithets that even an Aristotle could have come up with. Going back even farther than that, they could do that. The Social Security Trust Fund made that when Richard Nixon, was Head-Cover-UpChucker-In-Charge. There was a trail of . . . .way more than anyone might have thought possible.

So a first time in history, Obama-Biden also did the arithmetic of Matthew 20:1-16. About $400.00 was provided per person regardless if they had worked all the year or not. That could have served as a National COLA basis. The next phase would be to index the equal amount.

The Republicans took away the "Make Work Pay" Refundable Tax Credit as soon as they could. None of that Nazarene Jew crap would be allowed ever in the United States: They appear to have so-made the statement.

That left Obama in relatively differently dressed position. Mainly Pro Football Quarterbacks, following Joe Namath of the New York Jets: Could adapt to that position.

Now, that too: Is changed(?).

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many can be like young warriors outdistancing the Great Winds through desert passes: And not worry much about changing from anything at all!)

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Whereas Bain Capital, of the Ivy League brand, would take what money there was--and invest it among the already prosperous--and Whereas State and Local government , of the Ivy League brand, took what Stimulus money for them that there was, and spread amongst themselves--already properous: Not even a real Queen would do that, anymore. The real Queen of England even consented to be taxed! Even the Real Queens have changed(?)!

In Matthew 25:14-30, the servant provided the one talent clearly notes that putting the money to the exchangers leaves that servant left out. There is no way that anything near what the other two can bring in can happen: In that system.

Foreclosure even happens--of a sort. Foolish people do create systems like that--Christian, or Communist, or Socialist, or Jihadist, or Monarchy, or aristocracy--or any of the other epithets that even an Aristotle could have come up with. Going back even farther than that, they could do that. The Social Security Trust Fund made that when Richard Nixon, was Head-Cover-UpChucker-In-Charge. There was a trail of . . . .way more than anyone might have thought possible.

So a first time in history, Obama-Biden also did the arithmetic of Matthew 20:1-16. About $400.00 was provided per person regardless if they had worked all the year or not. That could have served as a National COLA basis. The next phase would be to index the equal amount.

The Republicans took away the "Make Work Pay" Refundable Tax Credit as soon as they could. None of that Nazarene Jew crap would be allowed ever in the United States: They appear to have so-made the statement.

That left Obama in relatively differently dressed position. Mainly Pro Football Quarterbacks, following Joe Namath of the New York Jets: Could adapt to that position.

Now, that too: Is changed(?).

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many can be like young warriors outdistancing the Great Winds through desert passes: And not worry much about changing from anything at all!)

you seem mentally retarded or is English your 4th language??

If you have an objection to libertarian conservatism why not state it, briefly, in good English and then your lesson can begin.

 

[mascale]

The critique is of this below, which in fact a fourth grader can understand. The Ivy cannot grasp this below:

"In Matthew 25:14-30, the servant provided the one talent clearly notes that putting the money to the exchangers leaves that servant left out. There is no way that anything near what the other two can bring in can happen: In that system."

"Libertarian Conservative," in fact: Does Not Exist. It is not shown that Ron Paul sleeps in with Rand Paul. That could be construed "libertarian." The fact that they do not is hardly thrifty. More likely they live in "Separate But Equal" housing, and regard that as being Constitutional Conservativism.

The Contention in the posts actually shows an original Obamanomics more anarchist than conservative. Widespread Wealth Worldwide is indirectly shown not in existence on the planet. Widespread Wealth Worldwide would be a pre-conditon for an anarchy.

Example: Governor Romney's becoming famous allusion to the 47% who will never vote for him. There are victims of the arithmetic shown in Matthew 24:14-30, most recently in the foreclosure crisis!

Governor Romney is shown unaware of both the arithmetic, and the foreclosure crisis.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, not Stirred!"
(Maybe remarks from the undisclosed location, should remain in the undisclosed location(?)!)

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The critique is of this below, which in fact a fourth grader can understand. The Ivy cannot grasp this below:

"In Matthew 25:14-30, the servant provided the one talent clearly notes that putting the money to the exchangers leaves that servant left out. There is no way that anything near what the other two can bring in can happen: In that system."

"Libertarian Conservative," in fact: Does Not Exist. It is not shown that Ron Paul sleeps in with Rand Paul. That could be construed "libertarian." The fact that they do not is hardly thrifty. More likely they live in "Separate But Equal" housing, and regard that as being Constitutional Conservativism.

The Contention in the posts actually shows an original Obamanomics more anarchist than conservative. Widespread Wealth Worldwide is indirectly shown not in existence on the planet. Widespread Wealth Worldwide would be a pre-conditon for an anarchy.

Example: Governor Romney's becoming famous allusion to the 47% who will never vote for him. There are victims of the arithmetic shown in Matthew 24:14-30, most recently in the foreclosure crisis!

Governor Romney is shown unaware of both the arithmetic, and the foreclosure crisis.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, not Stirred!"
(Maybe remarks from the undisclosed location, should remain in the undisclosed location(?)!)

More idiotic incoherent English. Why not ask a simple question in one sentence or less rather than rant gibberish??

 

[Politico]

Seriously I read that three times and it still makes no sense.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Seriously I read that three times and it still makes no sense.

and the clown who wrote it is so sure of his conceptual genius!

 

[mascale]

A lot of the Ivy League is finally just Jewish, for now. It might as well have been so in history gone by.

The ordinary German in the Third Republic also kept the money, while Decimations Holocaust was happening.

The ordinary Ivy Leaguer, anywhere at all, also kept the money will the Foreclosure Holocaust was happening.

The ordinary Persian, when the Shah was around, also kept the money, celebrating Koran-based types of law--which they put in place later.

All the some bunch, and all the same clergy! No one has a clue of how any of it could have come about--decade after decade, century after century, and milienia after milenia!

Anarchy is not at issue. Government is everywhere at issue.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many Now Come to Lands of Many Nations! Celebrate Great Spirit--Seven Come Eleven!)

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

A lot of the Ivy League is finally just Jewish, for now. It might as well have been so in history gone by.

The ordinary German in the Third Republic also kept the money, while Decimations Holocaust was happening.

The ordinary Ivy Leaguer, anywhere at all, also kept the money will the Foreclosure Holocaust was happening.

The ordinary Persian, when the Shah was around, also kept the money, celebrating Koran-based types of law--which they put in place later.

All the some bunch, and all the same clergy! No one has a clue of how any of it could have come about--decade after decade, century after century, and milienia after milenia!

Anarchy is not at issue. Government is everywhere at issue.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many Now Come to Lands of Many Nations! Celebrate Great Spirit--Seven Come Eleven!)

gibberish and the clown who wrote it is sure of his conceptual genius!

 

[Stephanie]

Nothing like having the lamestream media on your side eh?

I think the people will see through all their BS

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Nothing like having the lamestream media on your side eh?

Imagine if Romney had two Nazi parents and voted to the right of a Nazi in the Congress. Would the media think it a big deal ??

But the media could care less about Barry becuase his parents were merely communists.

 

[mascale]

Quote: Originally Posted by EdwardBaiamonte
__________________________________________
Quote: Originally Posted by mascale
Earlier in the cycle, the Republicans were famously railing at the concept of a giant Entitlements welfare state. So earlier in the Cycle, others looked at the source of the complaint. Romney was essentially bashing his own, and now less likely, source of voter turnout. Old Sucks! Deeper than that. Old Sucks don't get a lot of the money. Doctors get a lot of the money! The already properous get a lot of the money. Obama-Biden capped that in the Health Care Reform. Rep. Ryan nearly accused of them of Grand Theft Larceny! The Budget Committee Chairman essentially called budgeting, a criminal act!

Contrary to "Entitlement Society" Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households!

Most of the "Entitlements Society" money goes to doctors--aka, medical care. The funnel are the Old Sucks, drawing down what was paid in. So excluding all the old, disabled, and destroyed: Then 9% of "Entitlements Society" goes to the unemployed--also drawing down what was paid in!

Rep. Ryan famously did call attention to what became of all the Obama Campaign posters, recycled now as ceiling decorations. In the alternative, the college-educated little surfers and skateboarders might be expected to do something innovative and creative on their own. Romney himself railed at them: To go out and bum from mom and dad, for a start-up loan!

Rep. Ryan seems to know what actually became of that money(?)! That advice may have already been taken to heart, and mind, and soul!

In Matthew 25:14-30, the "victim" concept is clearly shown. The servant with one talent cannot possibly be expected to do as well, as the people with the more money to put to the money changers. The Money-Changers had been around before. They even around now. The money-changers are more the Conservative Brand than are anyone. So the bottom tier become computing "victims."

Over in Matthew 20:1-16, the "good" householder turns the already prosperous into "victims." They get the same money as the relatively less prosperous, at work all day long. Obama-Biden-Pelosi-Reid provided that alternative in "The Make-Work-Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit," at about $400.00 regardless if anyone had worked all the year or not!

That is actually a pay methodology, not an entitlement.

The Republicans took that methodology away, as soon as they could, after the midterms. So victims they intended, and now they reap what they have sown!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes come to Lands of Many Nations: Not knowing that "Seven Come Eleven" can also create a class of victims(?)!--like in the campaign of the Two Stupid Guys for President and Vice President, GOP!)
__________________________________________
To which Edward Baiamonte poster remarked:

"Incoherent, mistaken, idiotic, English. Is English your 4th language? Cant you have Mom edit before you post pure gibberish?"
__________________________________
To which another poster was able to show, likely from experience with other EdwardBaiamonte posts, or threads:

"which is eds method of saying 'this is way to complex. Let me suggest some con dogma to post. Much easier' And that is eds job. "

"ED'S METHOD OF SAYING "THIS IS WAY TO COMPLEX. LET ME SUGGEST SOME CON DOGMA TO POST. . .MUCH EASIER" AND THAT IS ED'S JOB(?!)"

There is no apparent posting of anything explaining what alternative EdwardBaiamonte poster wants to show.

Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Rep. Paul Ryan most recently has noted that in fact Governor Romney is major inarticulate!)