Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"The American support for the resolution, after decades in which it supported Israel on this issue, came as a complete surprise," the paper said.
"In the secret talks that Netanyahu held with Obama's men... Israel was promised that the resolution would not focus on Israel and that if it did, the Americans would vote against."
"It is an undeniably negative change to US policy" with regards to Israel's nuclear programme, said Eitan Gilboa, an analyst from Bar Ilan University near Tel Aviv.
Pointing to contradiction between Obama both applauding the resolution and criticising it for singling out Israel, Gilboa said Washington was "losing its leadership role because of the naive and unrealistic" outlook of its president.
The document, which singles out Israel but makes no mention of Iran's controversial nuclear programme, drew a furious reaction from the Jewish state who decried it as "deeply flawed and hypocritical."
"Naive fuck up" is about the kindest thing anyone could say.
This president is a foreign policy disaster. We will be a decade trying to repair the damage he will do.
OK, so maybe it is not news that the U.N. system is hypocritical and useless. What is news is this: The Obama administration has broken with 40 years of precedent and has affixed its signature to a document suggesting that it is Israel's weapons -- not Iran's -- that ought to be priority No. 1 in the Middle East.
And now, post-flotilla, the Obama administration stands in danger of being drawn into the attempt to open Hamas-ruled Gaza to military-capable imports, and to force Israel to engage in some kind of negotiation with Hamas.
What a naive fuck up he is. Experience does have its advantages.
If you think that most states were not aware of this in 1975, then your naivete knows no bounds.Show of hands, how many in this thread agree with this? Just wondering.
Revealed: how Israel offered to sell South Africa nuclear weapons | World news | The Guardian
Show of hands, how many in this thread agree with this? Just wondering.
Revealed: how Israel offered to sell South Africa nuclear weapons | World news | The Guardian
What a naive fuck up he is. Experience does have its advantages.
Oh CRAP--what has he promised the ignorant masses now?
View attachment 10461
LOOK--the ONLY way OBAMA solidifies his BASE--is by promising the masses something that others work hard for that his base gets for FREE.
That's it.
It's his punish success while rewarding failure policy. It's that simple.
Maybe the Jewish voters will finally wake up and stop mimicking the black vote in '10 and '12.
What does this have to do with the OP?
The "top secret" minutes of meetings between senior officials from the two countries in 1975 show that South Africa's defence minister, PW Botha, asked for the warheads and Shimon Peres, then Israel's defence minister and now its president, responded by offering them "in three sizes". The two men also signed a broad-ranging agreement governing military ties between the two countries that included a clause declaring that "the very existence of this agreement" was to remain secret.
"Moves" and "solidify" in the same breath. Heh, wouldn't be surprised if you all were now crying about how he takes a Dump.
